Because this play allows my numbers the greatest margin of error, In other words according to how I capped the game... this play has the best chance to win.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BoutTime:
Why the hell would you tease this game then??????
Because this play allows my numbers the greatest margin of error, In other words according to how I capped the game... this play has the best chance to win.
Damn! these threads are just getting worse and worse.....Why even bother posting anything in here why not everyone just start measuring their egos from the start of the thread.
Last time I looked in here this was the MNF thread for Atlanta vs New Orleans.
0
Damn! these threads are just getting worse and worse.....Why even bother posting anything in here why not everyone just start measuring their egos from the start of the thread.
Last time I looked in here this was the MNF thread for Atlanta vs New Orleans.
Ditka says....Atl. is expecting to have to play a different game than they are built to play.........that is a recipe for a bad night.
No offense b, but having to listen to Ditka give analysis is a recipe for a bad night. He rarely has any insight of value before a game.
I'm thinking of a half-unit play on a parlay of Atlanta +12 / Under 56. I know this goes against the grain, but on a weekend when the Giants get blown out, the Cardinals get smoked by the Panthers, the Broncos get taken to the cleaners, and Miami wins on 2 KO returns, it makes perfect sense.
The over must be overvalued here, as everyone plays it weekly. And it is still a division game. Those who look at the Saints beatdown of the Giants should have seen what the Eagles did to the same team. The Giints are having serious issues.
No way do I think the under is a lock, but I do think it goes hand-in-hand with an Atlanta cover. In other words, IF Atlanta covers, the under has a better shot. Might as well take em both.
GL all...
0
Quote Originally Posted by bhopkins:
Ditka says....Atl. is expecting to have to play a different game than they are built to play.........that is a recipe for a bad night.
No offense b, but having to listen to Ditka give analysis is a recipe for a bad night. He rarely has any insight of value before a game.
I'm thinking of a half-unit play on a parlay of Atlanta +12 / Under 56. I know this goes against the grain, but on a weekend when the Giants get blown out, the Cardinals get smoked by the Panthers, the Broncos get taken to the cleaners, and Miami wins on 2 KO returns, it makes perfect sense.
The over must be overvalued here, as everyone plays it weekly. And it is still a division game. Those who look at the Saints beatdown of the Giants should have seen what the Eagles did to the same team. The Giints are having serious issues.
No way do I think the under is a lock, but I do think it goes hand-in-hand with an Atlanta cover. In other words, IF Atlanta covers, the under has a better shot. Might as well take em both.
Ryan is 11-3 in his indoor starts. That puts him in some pretty good company. The only two quarterbacks in history with better records in their first 14 indoor starts are Kurt Warner and Marc Bulger. They each started off 13-1.
just thought this was interesting go falcons!!
0
Ryan is 11-3 in his indoor starts. That puts him in some pretty good company. The only two quarterbacks in history with better records in their first 14 indoor starts are Kurt Warner and Marc Bulger. They each started off 13-1.
Damn! these threads are just getting worse and worse.....Why even bother posting anything in here why not everyone just start measuring their egos from the start of the thread.
Last time I looked in here this was the MNF thread for Atlanta vs New Orleans.
TELL ME ABOUT, ALL THIS DOES IS DRIVE U NUTS. FINAL PICK SAINT AND OVER. GL
0
Quote Originally Posted by bigdaddyhpd:
Damn! these threads are just getting worse and worse.....Why even bother posting anything in here why not everyone just start measuring their egos from the start of the thread.
Last time I looked in here this was the MNF thread for Atlanta vs New Orleans.
TELL ME ABOUT, ALL THIS DOES IS DRIVE U NUTS. FINAL PICK SAINT AND OVER. GL
Here is an honest opinion. Every week I get on here just to see who the majority is on and then go the other way. Has been working pretty well so far. Atlanta is a play off team with a pretty solid running game. Think the Saints win on a late FG but Falcons cover. Vegas makes some money tonight. Falcons and the under.
0
Here is an honest opinion. Every week I get on here just to see who the majority is on and then go the other way. Has been working pretty well so far. Atlanta is a play off team with a pretty solid running game. Think the Saints win on a late FG but Falcons cover. Vegas makes some money tonight. Falcons and the under.
Over six games NO has won by an average of 18.5, and never by less than 12. So I'll go with the home team, and lay the points. (Although I can hear the ghost of Howard Cosell whispering "there's always a first time.")
0
Over six games NO has won by an average of 18.5, and never by less than 12. So I'll go with the home team, and lay the points. (Although I can hear the ghost of Howard Cosell whispering "there's always a first time.")
TELL ME ABOUT, ALL THIS DOES IS DRIVE U NUTS. FINAL PICK SAINT AND OVER. GL
good luck. I'm with you on the over but actually think the Saints will suffer their first loss tonight. I stayed away from the sides and stuck with the total.
I don't know why members point each other out...it waste more time & thread space pointing out what a member picked wrong than anything else.
0
Quote Originally Posted by 082278:
TELL ME ABOUT, ALL THIS DOES IS DRIVE U NUTS. FINAL PICK SAINT AND OVER. GL
good luck. I'm with you on the over but actually think the Saints will suffer their first loss tonight. I stayed away from the sides and stuck with the total.
I don't know why members point each other out...it waste more time & thread space pointing out what a member picked wrong than anything else.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.