All Forums | Pro Football

Cleveland at Chicago (11/01/2009)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 2996
Posts: 30
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2002
Posts: 61
Posted: #1

Away:  Cleveland [3-4 ATS]
Home:  Chicago [3-3 ATS]

Game Time: 1:00 PM
Stadium: Soldier Field

Recent Meetings:
N/A

Team Leaders:

Cleveland:
Passing: Derek Anderson (605)
Rushing: Jamal Lewis (280)
Receiving: Mohamed Massaquoi (300)

Chicago:
Passing: Jay Cutler (1452)
Rushing: Matt Forte (318)
Receiving: Devin Hester (373)

More:
Live Odds
In-Depth Matchup Information
Consensus Betting Information

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 2347
Posted: #2
Under 40
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 896
Posted: #3
LOL... I know the Browns are bad, but the Bears aren't much better and favored by as much as 14 points..lol I'd take the Browns for the hell of it.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 355
Posted: #4
cleve
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 644
Posted: #5
Bears have no running game makes cutler throw more and wev'e seen the results. Agree Cleve just awful seems like alot of pts
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 101
Posted: #6

This is a warning for all bettor’s not even sure if it will concern any of you but wanted to give everyone the heads up. About a month ago I found a website called Toutbuster.com. This is a website that proclaims to win you money if you subscribe to his picks. So I decided to give it a try for shits and giggles. He even posts his outcomes for every week under his “records” section on the website. First week (September 19th-25th) I was on it he lost over $10,000 dollars, thank goodness I don’t be as much as he does but either way I lost too. Luckily my subscription was for two months though. Well needless to say since that week he has been getting hammered and will also not update his website which would show that he has been losing for the past month and a half. He also said he would refund anyone’s money after a certain subscription time if he was losing, which he has not done. Long story short DO NOT WASTE YOUR TIME WITH THIS SITE. HE IS FULL OF SHIT. Here are his most recent picks

 

10/26 Philadelphia Eagles Under 37.5 Bet $750 LOSER

10/26 Rangers/Phoenix Under 5.5 Bet $750 LOSER

10/27 Boston/Cleveland Over 188 Bet $750 LOSER

10/27 Lakers/ Clippers Over 206.5 Bet $750 LOSER

 

Here are his picks for tonight, you may want to fade these

 

10/28 Oklahoma City -9.5 Bet $750

10/28 New Orleans/ San Antonio Under 185 Bet $750

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 97
Posted: #7
both Ds suck, but clevland has a hard time scoring.  the only way i'd put money on clevland would be if they had a passing game because the bears give a lot of passing yards...but they don't have a passing game.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 10129
Posted: #8
Feeling the under pretty strongly.  Besides the beatdown the Bears gave the lions the Bears haven't been stellar offensively at all.  The Browns have a pretty decent defense which will probably score more touchdowns than their offense this season. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 69
Posted: #9

YOU GUYS ARE OUT OF YOUR MINDS.CHICAGO HAD A BAD GAME NO DOUBT.BUT THEY ARE ATLEAST 2 TOUCHDOWNS BETTER THEN CLEVELAND.THIS IS GOING TO BE AN ABSOULUTE ROUT.COME ON CLEVELAND CAN'T SCORE.CHICAGO IS PISSED AND CLEVELAND IS GOOD MEDICINE.THEY WERE EMBARASSED AND WILL TAKE IT OUT ON CLEVELAND.

 

CHI-TOWN 38-CLEVELAND-10

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 5051
Posted: #10
Quote Originally Posted by pizoniballer31:

YOU GUYS ARE OUT OF YOUR MINDS.CHICAGO HAD A BAD GAME NO DOUBT.BUT THEY ARE ATLEAST 2 TOUCHDOWNS BETTER THEN CLEVELAND.THIS IS GOING TO BE AN ABSOULUTE ROUT.COME ON CLEVELAND CAN'T SCORE.CHICAGO IS PISSED AND CLEVELAND IS GOOD MEDICINE.THEY WERE EMBARASSED AND WILL TAKE IT OUT ON CLEVELAND.

 

CHI-TOWN 38-CLEVELAND-10

  Have to agree with you Pizoniballer 31. While the points given to the Browns is a bit scary- Vegas is desparate to get too heavily "sided" on this tilt! However, as the case, in most lop sided contests,  Da Bears should wrap this game up by the 3rd quarter. I see a Browns team emotionally letdown, and just the opposite, with Chicago very up for this contest!. Yeah- This year's Bears really aren't that good- but against the Browns- come on! The "brownies" bring nothing to the table vs. a determined Chicago squad looking "for a victim"!!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 467
Posted: #11

Forte should have a big game this week against the 2nd worst rushing defense in the league.

CHI -13

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 57
Posted: #12

browns have a horrible defense as they can not defend the run or the pass with any consistency, that is Great news for cutler, his receivers, and forte.... chicago D should have an okay day, browns have not found the offensive consistency either... weather will not be of any consequence, bears will cover the number, barely... bears 20- browns 6

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 917
Posted: #13
I think a lot of people were on Chicago and lost last week and now want to go against them with the points.  I actually had Cinci last week and am taking the bears (-6.5 teased this week)  People forgot Cinci is really good last week because they had a classic letdown game (vs Hou) now it will be Chicago's turn to have a good game at home, they aren't as bad as last week indicates no team is as good or bad as there last game.  I try to not get too high or too low on a team.

This is reminding me of the KC-SD game last week, a lot of people were on SD vs Den and lost, so immediately faded them with KC and to me it was a good spot to back SD at -5.  Its helpful to always make an effort to not auto fade a team because they didn't win for you the week prior if anybody is.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 10129
Posted: #14
Quote Originally Posted by pickinvet:

I think a lot of people were on Chicago and lost last week and now want to go against them with the points.  I actually had Cinci last week and am taking the bears (-6.5 teased this week)  People forgot Cinci is really good last week because they had a classic letdown game (vs Hou) now it will be Chicago's turn to have a good game at home, they aren't as bad as last week indicates no team is as good or bad as there last game.  I try to not get too high or too low on a team.

This is reminding me of the KC-SD game last week, a lot of people were on SD vs Den and lost, so immediately faded them with KC and to me it was a good spot to back SD at -5.  Its helpful to always make an effort to not auto fade a team because they didn't win for you the week prior if anybody is.


Agreed, there is a certain criteria you should follow when fading teams and one week of play is never the reason.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 97
Posted: #15

i have to agree with you pick

i got caught up in the KC SD game and took KC

I'll follow your lead here.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 8
Posted: #16
Chicago -13
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 23
Posted: #17
Forte to finally have a decent game/hester makes a big play/cutler finds 3 different wr.... game goes over and Bears make a statement to THEIR fans that they havent given up on the season!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 104
Posted: #18
Cleveland are in the stage of Reconstruction right now so I expect Chicago to demolish them.  Cleveland are aware that their chances to making it to the playoffs are next to impossible.  On the other hand, Chicago was seen as a one of the dominating NFC teams before season opener and so they know they must regain their confidence after losing 2 straight games.   They demolished Detroit 48-24 and I don't see the difference between how bad the Lions are to Browns.  I will wait for a more accurate weather condition to determine whether the over/under is the way to go.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 128
Posted: #19
bears will be pumped for halftime tribute to walter patton.bears and cover.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 6268
Posted: #20
Bears -13.5
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 1114
Posted: #21
DA BEARS
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2001
Posts: 13368
Posted: #22
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 727
Posted: #23
Taking Browns +13.5 in my weighted 7 game/week pool as my 4 point game... but not gonna touch em othawise


gl
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 29
Posted: #24

OK guys christmas came early. Browns can't run, receivers can't catch, w/ no running game, and NO right side of the line. The D is ranked last and the cornerbacks are the WORST. Brandon McDonald is the worst DBack in the league. Cutler will pick the apart like he did with denver last year, speaking of last year Cutler had a 4th string running back and ran all over Browns!!!

Please men win all $$$$$ with this game. Trust me I'm from Cleveland  PS The players are giving up on Mangini!!!

 

 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 984
Posted: #25
CLE +14.5: I smell a blow out of epic proportions. But since the line moved past the key number of 14, I’ll buck the trend of the heavy favorites covering this year. If things haven’t gotten worse for the Brownies, they lost their star linebacker D’Qwell Jackson for the year. I’ll wait till gametime before I pull the trigger on this one, in case it steams higher. Score: Bears 23 – Browns 13 (2 units).
All Forums | Pro Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.