All Forums | Pro Football

Denver at San Diego (10/19/2009)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 26060
Posts: 350
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 14
Posted: #126
Pro-z....seriously...plain and simple shut the fuck up...

6 pages of comments, half of which is your little immature bickering and the other half is what it is supposed to be...opinions and stats pertaining to the GAME. 

Your an insult to middle easterners, including myself.  No one wants to see your 35 posts of ahahahahahahahahah...grow up?
.
.
.
My 2 cents on the game

Taking SD buying the half for a must-win game in front of the nation.  Young Denver team is going to get exposed late in the game.  Halftime 17-14

SD 31  Den  21

Could be wrong, but thats the art of gambling

Good luck to all




 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 627
Posted: #127
Quote Originally Posted by Farrar:

I mentioned earlier a good source that I use is predicitng a 17-14 type of game. I just can't see it but this guy is a very knowledgable gambler who has given me tips and advice for years. I MIGHT play a teaser with Denver +10 and Under 51 BUT will probably tease Denver with the over.

Good Luck!

Always follow up a good tip with some research so that you feel good about a wager. If you doubt the wager, you shouldn't make it. But if you stumble upon info that confirms the good tip that someone that you trust gave you, by all means "GET THAT MONEY!"

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 467
Posted: #128
Quote Originally Posted by pro-z:

ok sorry for posting too much but this is all info.. stalker you are correct about what i said about chicago but dont tell me luck did not play a factor for atlanta.. chicago was gonna score on them but the pen calling screwd them on a 4th and 1.. chicago should have covered but they did not.. and think about it.. you said they have been going at it for 3 years and sd owned it.. nop that is wrong my friend because sd lost to denver 38-39 but relly take a deep breath and think if sd won most of these games for the past 3 years dont you think shit changes?!? dont you think oakland shouldf not beat philli, az won by that much over seatle, new england scoring 4 touch downs in 1 quarter in the snow if that was the case.. i think i made a point

I said SD has dominated this game lately going 5-0-1 ATS the last 3 years and that SD has won that division the last 3 years. Last year's 39-38 loss was a push for SD. And of course I think shit changes. But take a real look at the AFC and see who is at the top of the divisions or right in the thick of things again. New England, Pittsburgh, Indy. San Diego is usually the 4th team out of that bunch. I think they make their push towards the division lead tonight. So as much as I'd like to believe that things change I haven't seen any evidence out of the AFC to back this up. Cleveland, Kansas City, Oakland, Buffalo are all still very bad teams year after year. And it's starting to look like those 3 teams I named earlier are competing for the AFC crown again.

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 627
Posted: #129
Quote Originally Posted by pro-z:

looool you people are soooo funny alll what i have said went through but for 2 teams.. al what you guys are trying to do is make your self feel better about your losses lol pizoniballer31 my record is based on a free capping contest that i did not want to go in after i found out i'm already late in the contest...
as for you cmale123 you know that chicago lost the game because of the 5 yard penelty that was called on 4th and one on the goal line with 36 seconds left on the clock.. we where robbed from that game .. and to all of you hatazz i'm not replying anymore al my posts stand for them self.. why dont you go put your money on philli beating oakland ahahahahah denver will win today and i will bring more cash home and guess what all of you will lose more.. thank you very much and there are people here that appreciate my pics.. read the second page and you will know and those are the ones that read carefully unlike you drug addicts that got mad about losing your money.. pzpz

I just read this "carefully" and the conclusion that I have come to is "Never trust a pick from someone that can't spell!"

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 6
Posted: #130
ok, i'll bite. I've been at this a LONG time. There are no such things as should have's or would have's in sports betting.

The plays, penalties, turnovers, etc sealed CHI's fate, not the 4th down play. The game is much longer than 1 play. actually, if you look at it from an ATL bettor, they should've covered by 14+ points. It is human nature to look back and see what you want to see.

When SD lost by one they were getting 1 point sooooooooo (push). Other than that SD has been laying and covered 5 of 5 (with the tie no incl). 5-0-1 in a div rivalry ain't too bad.

Oak should not have beaten philly, but if you take OAK on ML whenever they are +8 dogs you will win $$$$ every year. It's who they are. Shit rarely changes.

Sea stinks. I got burned because i thought shit changes for a second (Hassleback as it turns out is not Jesus Christ)

NE was the easiest pick on the board IMO, and saved me from kicking my dog for that SEA pick.

I am certainly not saying that SD is a lock, but i do feel that this line is correct. DEN is playing up, and SD has been playing down. We'll just have to see where those two meet tonight.

They don't call it winning, they call it gambling.

p.s.- try typing in Word first and using spell/grammar check. I almost needed a translator to get through your post(SSSSSSSSS).
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2009
Posts: 14
Posted: #131
Quote Originally Posted by pro-z:

this is not your forum ill beat it when i want


Oh, now I understand.  I finally get it,


HEY EVERYONE, this is PRO-V's forum.

WOW, that explains the 10,000 + posts now!!  MY bad loser.  Your right I'll leave then, good luck w/your bets tonight.

C'mon EVERYONE, let's leave this douche to himself.

Peace.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 1142
Posted: #132
Quote Originally Posted by BreakaBookie:

I think the consensus is that you are killing these forums....
 
 
am I alone here?
 
 
if I am then I'll gladly refrain.... but I think that the majority of the forum is being annoyed by your posts...
 
 
 

I agree. Oh and I said I was just watching tonight. I would guess Denver though @ plus 4 which is on my pending picks section. I had planned on takin Denver early last week, but just not feelin it. Monday nights can be wild. There are some decent games on the NCAA this weekend on first glance.

Someone above said it best to just ignore that guy... don't feed the fool.

Good luck guys.

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 6
Posted: #133
how bout this:
If DEN wins, then you can have this thread all to yourself.
If DEN loses, then you go away forever.
BET?

sounds like a win-win for everyone (including yourself)
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 627
Posted: #134
If Denver doesn't cover or win......
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 114
Posted: #135
Here We Go Denver Here We Go! San Diego you are about to be bat dadded!
 
I think you guys can guess who I like... Plus we have on our sweet brown and yellow throwbacks on tonight.
 
But I will say it kinda feels like a trap game.... S.D. will be up for this one. Call me a homer idk.
 
6-0 B R O N C O S ! ! !
 
Denver +3, Under 44
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 627
Posted: #136
Never under estimate the power of an uncontrolled EGO !
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 627
Posted: #137
Quote Originally Posted by ibisgas:

how bout this:
If DEN wins, then you can have this thread all to yourself.
If DEN loses, then you go away forever.
BET?

sounds like a win-win for everyone (including yourself)
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 114
Posted: #138
Yo chezman creepy avatar dude, awsome lol.
 
 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 602
Posted: #139
Quote Originally Posted by pro-z:

your*** and another thing i did not ask for anyone to believe me.. why the hell do i care what you think .

no one gives a rats ass what you think now quit tainting the threads rookie.....

sd and the under

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 117
Posted: #140
All Denver backers B E W A R E! 

T               R                        A                           P  
  
CHARGERS ARE 3-0 LAST 3 GAMES AT SD!                 

Use your brain!  Y is a 5-0 team getting 3.5 points, because they beat dallas and pats?  The pats came out horrible first 3 weeks! and i think a few of their wins were at home!
 Anyways.  Im backing sd at home and big!
                                    I will say i told you so! 

SD  31
DN  24
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 107
Posted: #141
Let all take some prozacs..... ;)   
 
My choice for tonight is Denvr to cover.... but San Diego to pull the win ...
Denver next 3 games : SD, Baltimore and Pittsburgh .... SD has KC and oakland next ... Denver will be playing with precaution and this game is very decisive for standing in their division... SD has nothing to lose presently ...
 
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 35
Posted: #142
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 1743
Posted: #143
the more and more I think about this game, the more I am liking the over...

Josh McDaniels callled the best offense in the history of the NFL.... the Broncos have playmakers on both sides of the ball.... their running game doesn't have to be that great because SD is terrible at stopping the run lol...

SD has a very good offense and can put points up on the best defenses...  Gates is a mismatch for any linebacker or safety....

In my opinion this ends up being a high scoring game just like most of the games between these 2 teams are....


I like San Diego -3.5... but I'm going to lay off the side and just bet the OVER....


OVER has hit every monday night this year except for the Dallas Carolina game....


Good Luck To All....

(not you pro-z, I hope you lose big tonight)

than again, you probably don't even bet real money lol, you just come to these threads to start arguements.....

I know I should regarding pro-z....

but I couldn't resist LOL 


don't forget to breakyourbookie


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 394
Posted: #144
I have bet Denver every week since they beat Cinci, and lost on that game...They have been very Proffitable.
 
I will say this, Monday Night Football is not like your regular 4pm Sunday game,,,This is MNF, and ever since I can remember, The Chargers have always been a tough team on MNF.
 
Two weeks to prepare, fix all of there problems, coming off the bye, I think San Diego takes care of business tonight, and it Goes OVER for sure
 
 
SD -2.5 1st Half
SD -2.5 -145 Game
SD -2.5/Parlay Over 44
 
 
GLTA
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 6
Posted: #145
perfect. done. no turning back now.

you get this thread only if denver covers

you go away if sd covers

is it 3-1/2 so we can't tie? i have it at 3 but i'm feeling generous.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 394
Posted: #146
One more thing, there is a reason why you have to bet -130 to take SD -3, and I understand the whole 3.5 -110 or 3 -130...The books want you to take Denver +3 +110, otherwise they would give you the option...Some books do, but a lot arent doing it
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 24
Posted: #147
Pro Z,
 
How come when I read your posts, all I can think of is Sasha Baron Cohen's character, Ali G?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 294
Posted: #148
DAMN , WHAT BUNCH OF BS ! ! ! !
Anybody here has children ?????
They usually thrive on attention....
 Solution ????
Are you guys capable ?????
Don't even read his BS and Repeat three times.......


DON' T FEED THE FOOL

DON' T FEED THE FOOL

DON' T FEED THE FOOL  !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 674
Posted: #149
dumber than dumb they don't come
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 467
Posted: #150
yeah i think it was the same time you piced chicago to win
All Forums | Pro Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.