Green bay at chicago (09/27/2010)

Prospect

Joined: Sep, 2010

Posts: 191

Posted: Sep. 27, 2010 - 12:27 PM ET #51

Quote Originally Posted by lefty1209:

Pack by at least 10!!! Chicago beat a weak Dallas team and should have lost to Detroit. Cutler has been nothing but hype his whole career. Good Luck all!!!!

greenbay has squeeked by the eagles and only put up 255 yrds against a garbage buffalo team that had 3 starters out on D in greenbay not the prolific offense that the media would expect you to belive.. 75% is on GB and line hasn't moved... nuff said

BreakaBookie

Veteran

Joined: Sep, 2006

Posts: 1743

Posted: Sep. 27, 2010 - 12:51 PM ET #52

I'm on DAAAAAA Bears...

buying the hook to make it 3.5

I also forsee a high scoring game...

total points in the mid-50's

good luck to all!

handicapped

Prospect

Joined: Sep, 2006

Posts: 117

Posted: Sep. 27, 2010 - 1:03 PM ET #53

Grab it before the line drops below 3:

THE BEARS +3.5

greek04champs

Prospect

Joined: Jan, 2007

Posts: 87

Posted: Sep. 27, 2010 - 1:05 PM ET #54

Well tonight the PACKERS will finally be hit back into the real world when rogers is sacked over and over again when they play the real strar team of the NFC NORTH DA BEARS they win and cover in a close 1 .BEARS win the NFC NORTH remember that in 2 months people.

greek04champs

Prospect

Joined: Jan, 2007

Posts: 87

Posted: Sep. 27, 2010 - 1:08 PM ET #55

[Quote: Originally Posted by greek04champs] Well tonight the PACKERS will finally be hit back into the real world when rogers is sacked over and over again when they play the real strar team of the NFC NORTH DA BEARS they win and cover in a close 1 .BEARS win the NFC NORTH remember that in 2 months people. 24 21 BEARS WIN.

bankjob

Prospect

Joined: Sep, 2010

Posts: 191

Posted: Sep. 27, 2010 - 1:21 PM ET #56

Quote Originally Posted by BreakaBookie:

I'm on DAAAAAA Bears...

buying the hook to make it 3.5

I also forsee a high scoring game...

total points in the mid-50's

good luck to all!

Def with ya on the hook, but not to sure about the over here.. bears will try to run some and keep packers off the field but dnt see the pack scoring a bunch on this D the secondary may be questionable but the pressure they put on alex will be a diff maker.

StevenGA1011

Captain

Joined: Jan, 2009

Posts: 6405

Posted: Sep. 27, 2010 - 1:43 PM ET #57

I'll be taking the unpopular route with the total on this one maybe its just from the familiarity with playing each other for 500 years or whatever but the last 10 contests between the 2 the game flew over 46 just once -- G -3 & UNDER 46

usnting3r

Prospect

Joined: Oct, 2009

Posts: 187

Posted: Sep. 27, 2010 - 1:51 PM ET #58

Please, the Jets owned the fish last night! It should have been a blowout but they let the fish hang around. Wait till next time when Revis is playing, the line will be Jets -10.5.

Rocky-Mountain

Rookie

Joined: Oct, 2007

Posts: 735

Posted: Sep. 27, 2010 - 2:08 PM ET #59

Chi +3

Chi-34 GB-21

jenny4singlebet

Prospect

Joined: Sep, 2010

Posts: 17

Posted: Sep. 27, 2010 - 2:14 PM ET #60

15379636	INTERNET: 4 Team Parlay risk 100 win 1263	429 Packers over 46 (-110) (NFL) WON: 427 Jets +1½ (EV) (NFL) Score: 31-23 WON: TOT OVR 427 Jets over 36 (-110) (NFL) Score: 31-23	Print
15379568	INTERNET: 2 Team IF ACTION risk 110 win 200 Belong to reverse	WON: TOT OVR 427 Jets over 36 (-110) risk 110 win 100 (NFL) Score: 31-23	Print
15379568	INTERNET: 2 Team IF ACTION risk 110 win 200 Belong to reverse	429 Packers over 46 (-110) risk 110 win 100 (NFL)	Print

jenny4singlebet

Prospect

Joined: Sep, 2010

Posts: 17

Posted: Sep. 27, 2010 - 2:17 PM ET #61

how do i insure my bet??? some body help me

jenny4singlebet

Prospect

Joined: Sep, 2010

Posts: 17

Posted: Sep. 27, 2010 - 2:18 PM ET #62

Quote Originally Posted by jenny4singlebet:

15379636	INTERNET: 4 Team Parlay risk 100 win 1263	429 Packers over 46 (-110) (NFL) WON: 427 Jets +1½ (EV) (NFL) Score: 31-23 WON: TOT OVR 427 Jets over 36 (-110) (NFL) Score: 31-23	Print
15379568	INTERNET: 2 Team IF ACTION risk 110 win 200 Belong to reverse	WON: TOT OVR 427 Jets over 36 (-110) risk 110 win 100 (NFL) Score: 31-23	Print
15379568	INTERNET: 2 Team IF ACTION risk 110 win 200 Belong to reverse	429 Packers over 46 (-110) risk 110 win 100 (NFL)	Print

do i need to insure my bet?

rick3117

All-Star

Joined: Mar, 2006

Posts: 14715

Posted: Sep. 27, 2010 - 2:23 PM ET #63

Insurance is for wusses.

bankjob

Prospect

Joined: Sep, 2010

Posts: 191

Posted: Sep. 27, 2010 - 2:26 PM ET #64

Quote Originally Posted by jenny4singlebet:

do i need to insure my bet?

have you already won 3-4 on the 4 team parlay?

gamblingreg

Prospect

Joined: Jul, 2007

Posts: 480

Posted: Sep. 27, 2010 - 2:28 PM ET #65

Quote Originally Posted by dddevin69:

if you carefully read what i said i said I LIKE 2 TEAMS BETTER THAN GREEN BAY TO GET TO THE SUPERBOWL. I don`t give a shit what espn ranks the packers i don`t like them to get there just stating my opinion , is espn right every year no they are`nt i think either the falcons or saints get there ahead of green bay just my opinion.

ok, u obviously know jack spit about the nfl with these comments. U know at least 2 teams better than green freakin bay!?!?!? really? did...did...u know that gb is listed as one of the top 2 teams on espns power rankings? I'm not saying that chicago can't win, but this has got to be one of the WORST posts I have seen in my life in any and all forums. sorry, not trying to be mean, just truthful.

bankjob

Prospect

Joined: Sep, 2010

Posts: 191

Posted: Sep. 27, 2010 - 2:34 PM ET #66

[Quote: Originally Posted by gamblingreg] [/Quot

greg your original post was spot on and you are way light on 2 greenbay is a good team but thats as far as it goes they have ZERO running game.. a sub par secondary.. that dosnt equal a 2nd place raking in anyones power rankings. ESPN is a propaganda machine and they have atleast one FAN out there beliving they are superbowl contenders..

Clark3232

Rookie

Joined: Sep, 2007

Posts: 670

Posted: Sep. 27, 2010 - 2:50 PM ET #67

Where is the DIRTY LITTLE HAMSTER that wrote a paragraph about how stupid I was for betting on the Rams ML? I usually don't like to rub it in but when someone has a write up about how horrible of a pick it is then I would love to see what they think now. The 'Skins were a "Lock" to win it. Oh yea dddevin like the Packers so I just doubled my bet for the Bears.........seriously.

mikeny

Veteran

Joined: Jan, 2007

Posts: 1937

Posted: Sep. 27, 2010 - 2:51 PM ET #68

Quote Originally Posted by bankjob:

Quote Originally Posted by gamblingreg:

[/Quot

Bankjob, I agree with you 2 teams better than greenbay regardless of thier current record: Superbowl champs Saints, the other team Colts. Third team for fun Pittsburg Steelers and possibly the Eagles.

One question to you, in your post you said pressure they put on Alex, who is Alex?

mikeny

Veteran

Joined: Jan, 2007

Posts: 1937

Posted: Sep. 27, 2010 - 2:53 PM ET #69

I putting my money agaisnt the public and on the Monday night Home dog: The Bears +3....I have faith in Cutler playing at home.

AcesBooted

Prospect

Joined: Dec, 2009

Posts: 244

Posted: Sep. 27, 2010 - 3:01 PM ET #70

Fudge Packers beat up on Kolb and almost gave it away when a decent qb in vick came in and also beat the bills! how is that more telling of a good team then Da Bears beating the Cowboys who a lot of people picked to go the distance and they mopped up the texans yesterday, and if they didnt have a few fumbles that would of been points they would of beat the lions soundly! Its not a great way to place a bet by judging teams on what they did last week! Both teams are for the most part evenly matched, if Da bears can step up their special teams play, and the ability of Martz to adjust his game plan and play calling, along with the home crowd, i like Da Bears chances!! Home Dog +3!!

jenny4singlebet

Prospect

Joined: Sep, 2010

Posts: 17

Posted: Sep. 27, 2010 - 3:03 PM ET #71

have you already won 3-4 on the 4 team parlay? yes only waiting 4 bears over

alx7877

Prospect

Joined: May, 2009

Posts: 11

Posted: Sep. 27, 2010 - 3:05 PM ET #72

I would usually take the Bears being a home underdog, but I am going to take the road favorite. Packers -3. Bears beat Detroit at home (barely) and beat Dallas who was woeful. Packers remind me of the Patriots of 07’ when they would beat teams by an average of 10-20 points utilizing a great running attack and an aerial assault. Mix that in with a Packers defense that is underrated and I think you have a clear cut winner. The Packers have the best defensive coordinator in the league and the defense can contain Cutler. Cutler does hold the highest passing rating in the NFL but if you look at a few of his touchdown passes…week 1 v. Lions – a 95 yard dump off to Matt Forte, a 40 yard wide open TD to Forte and week 2 at Cowboys a 60 yard blown coverage TD to Greg Olsen. Chicago’s defense is good but Aaron Rodgers reads defenses better and has the upper hand…that’s my opinion even though the Packers schedule has been very light up to this point and they very well could have lost to the Eagles if Vick was the starter that game. I like the Pack but it's going to be close...nail biter...no opinion on the o/u.

bankjob

Prospect

Joined: Sep, 2010

Posts: 191

Posted: Sep. 27, 2010 - 3:20 PM ET #73

Quote Originally Posted by jenny4singlebet:

have you already won 3-4 on the 4 team parlay? yes only waiting 4 bears over

bottom line is you have 1400+ comming if the game goes over with only 200 pending if it looses hedge it back on the under for 500-700 and take the guarnteed pay day!! many fools will tell you to let it ride but you are in great position that you can make 4 sure money.. great play to put yourself in the position you are in take a 500-700 win and be happy and watch the game stree free..