Damn Miami gave the gave away Sunday night. The Jets did not earn it. The penalties that resulted in first downs (then scores) were ridiculous. The receiver initiated contact with the DB and no helmet was contacted on one play. 2 possible INT's and just bad luck for the Fins and my wallet. I just knew if we didn;t get all the was for the TD at the end they would not get it from the 10 even with 4 downs. That's the way their luck (and play calling) went all day. I mean throwing a deep ball on 3rd and 2 in the early 4th???
So I vented, now tonight. Logic says GB so natualrally take the Bears due to key turnovers and bad calls (favoring the home team this time). Cutler will get 2 roughing the passer calls to keep scoring drives alive, and a pass interference will set them up on the 5.
Damn Miami gave the gave away Sunday night. The Jets did not earn it. The penalties that resulted in first downs (then scores) were ridiculous. The receiver initiated contact with the DB and no helmet was contacted on one play. 2 possible INT's and just bad luck for the Fins and my wallet. I just knew if we didn;t get all the was for the TD at the end they would not get it from the 10 even with 4 downs. That's the way their luck (and play calling) went all day. I mean throwing a deep ball on 3rd and 2 in the early 4th???
So I vented, now tonight. Logic says GB so natualrally take the Bears due to key turnovers and bad calls (favoring the home team this time). Cutler will get 2 roughing the passer calls to keep scoring drives alive, and a pass interference will set them up on the 5.
Green Bay - 21 Chicago - 20
Bears +3 under 46
Time for a good old fashioned black and blue divisional game. I'm taking the points with the Bears seeking revenge for last seasons home loss to the Pack.
Chicago - Under
Green Bay - 21 Chicago - 20
Bears +3 under 46
Time for a good old fashioned black and blue divisional game. I'm taking the points with the Bears seeking revenge for last seasons home loss to the Pack.
Chicago - Under
Just can't take either side ATS due to the uncertainty of BS calls so I'll lay what I've done for yrs, teased GB +4 and under 53. These teams will throw a lot I know because they won't be able to run, but I see sacks/hurries by both teams, a turnover or two close to the red zone and some FG's. 53 is lot to cover in the NFL and these teams notoriously play under 40.
GB +4 under 53 BOL
Just can't take either side ATS due to the uncertainty of BS calls so I'll lay what I've done for yrs, teased GB +4 and under 53. These teams will throw a lot I know because they won't be able to run, but I see sacks/hurries by both teams, a turnover or two close to the red zone and some FG's. 53 is lot to cover in the NFL and these teams notoriously play under 40.
GB +4 under 53 BOL
OK, so Jay Cutler has a great game against a bi-polar Dallas team and half the world has Chicago as a contender. Remember they only beat Detroit (stafford only played half game) 19-14.
Remember how bad Jay Cutler can be? Remember how bad the Bears can be? I just don't see it. Enlighten me Bears pumpers, still on the fence either GB or no play.
OK, so Jay Cutler has a great game against a bi-polar Dallas team and half the world has Chicago as a contender. Remember they only beat Detroit (stafford only played half game) 19-14.
Remember how bad Jay Cutler can be? Remember how bad the Bears can be? I just don't see it. Enlighten me Bears pumpers, still on the fence either GB or no play.
OK, so Jay Cutler has a great game against a bi-polar Dallas team and half the world has Chicago as a contender. Remember they only beat Detroit (stafford only played half game) 19-14.
Remember how bad Jay Cutler can be? Remember how bad the Bears can be? I just don't see it. Enlighten me Bears pumpers, still on the fence either GB or no play.
I think Cowboys had at least 3 turnovers, Romo 2 interceptions against Bears.
I don't see it with Bears. again, on the fence
OK, so Jay Cutler has a great game against a bi-polar Dallas team and half the world has Chicago as a contender. Remember they only beat Detroit (stafford only played half game) 19-14.
Remember how bad Jay Cutler can be? Remember how bad the Bears can be? I just don't see it. Enlighten me Bears pumpers, still on the fence either GB or no play.
I think Cowboys had at least 3 turnovers, Romo 2 interceptions against Bears.
I don't see it with Bears. again, on the fence
Can you believe it they are going to have 6 officers of the military tell the hole english speeking world that there is UFO'S Holy Shit private pile whats it coming to!! With that being said i'll take the bears---NOT!
GB Wins!
Can you believe it they are going to have 6 officers of the military tell the hole english speeking world that there is UFO'S Holy Shit private pile whats it coming to!! With that being said i'll take the bears---NOT!
GB Wins!
› | |
› |
Dogs were out of control yesterday going like 10-5. 9-6 were overs. Home dogs 60% for year. |
› | |
› |
Dogs were out of control yesterday going like 10-5. 9-6 were overs. Home dogs 60% for year. |
huh im confused the only 52% of public was on miami vegas won all weekend.. 10 out of 15 dogs covered and tonight will make 11!
huh im confused the only 52% of public was on miami vegas won all weekend.. 10 out of 15 dogs covered and tonight will make 11!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.