All Forums | Pro Football

Green Bay at Chicago (12/13/2009)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 3712
Posts: 30
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2002
Posts: 61
Posted: #1

Away:  Green Bay [7-4-1 ATS]
Home:  Chicago [4-8 ATS]

Game Time: 1:00 PM
Stadium: Soldier Field

Recent Meetings:
09/13/09 - CHI 15 vs. GB 21

Team Leaders:

Green Bay:
Passing: Aaron Rodgers (3399)
Rushing: Ryan Grant (931)
Receiving: Donald Driver (876)

Chicago:
Passing: Jay Cutler (2814)
Rushing: Matt Forte (634)
Receiving: Devin Hester (682)

More:
Live Odds
In-Depth Matchup Information
Consensus Betting Information

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 43
Posted: #2
Upset Alert:  Chicago playing at home, division game.  Green Bay short week after big Monday nite matchup with the Ravens.  Take Chicago in this game.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 5051
Posted: #3
  Expect a complete dismantling of the once proud Chicago Bears, as the team has mailed it in for the year! I don't expect incompetent Cutler back next year! GB rolls here, as pack will not take any prisoners in this division contest!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 131
Posted: #4
This line is very short, shouldn't it be Packers minus 6? Watch the line throughout the week, I smell a rat here. Saying that, Chicago is so beat up and we know how unorganized and uneasy thier offense is, its a no brainer to take the Packers. I just thought the line should be higher. ??????
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 123
Posted: #5
Green Bay at -3??!!!  Although it's a short week, GB just played at home.  So there's no jet lag or the headaches of travel.  Something's up with this game, but I gotta go with the team that has the better QB.

Green Bay -3
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 178
Posted: #6
im looking for a home game that the Bears have not won in a while I see a upset here lets go Cutler can you do something for Chicago and make them proud the record is surely not proving it. Well good luck everyone im for Chicago The Bears  ( for you walter this one ... a good ole rivalary.. im with you MR HAlas lets go kick some BU**
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 43
Posted: #7
GB -3 -125
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 8485
Posted: #8

Ah babeebeeee Ummm To easy folks!

Pack should totally dominate this team why only 3

Gotta watch the action and the line close on this one.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2003
Posts: 1600
Posted: #9

Everyone says the line looks fishy, then goes Packers anyways.  Have some balls...

CHICAGO +3

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 183
Posted: #10

I really like the over in this game... I think the turnovers will be big! These teams always play each other hard... I think the Bears will find a way to keep the game in reach. Now, is reach 6, or 3, that is the question??

I'm staying away from the line, but if either team scores off a turnover, this game goes over the total. (in my opinion)

Final play; Over 41 ($1)

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 950
Posted: #11

Cheeseheads cover the 3.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 107
Posted: #12
Da Bears +4
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 888
Posted: #13
Quote Originally Posted by vue21849:

  Expect a complete dismantling of the once proud Chicago Bears, as the team has mailed it in for the year! I don't expect incompetent Cutler back next year! GB rolls here, as pack will not take any prisoners in this division contest!


Cutler will be back, your crazy and stupid
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 984
Posted: #14
GB -3.5: a big rivalry game in the cold. I'll fade the struggling Cutler at Soldier Field and go with the hot hand of Rogers. Score: Green Bay 28-Bears 18 (3 units).
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 537
Posted: #15

Quote Originally Posted by mika23g:



Cutler will be back, your crazy and stupid

(VUE21849) THIS IS THE SAME GUY THAT SAID "THE PITTSBURGH STEELERS WERE PISSED OFF AND WILL BE  DESTROYING AND SPITTING OUT THE BROWNS" THIS PAST THURSDAY NIGHT GAME. IF YOU LOOK AT THE SAINTS VS FALCONS THREADS, HE POSTED QOUTE "FALCONS OWNS THE SAINTS". I HAVE BEEN BASING MY BETS AGAINST THIS GUYS POST AND HAVE BEEN SO FAR 100% CORRECT. I LOVE HIS POSTS CAUSE IT MAKES ME MONEY$$$$$. I BELIEVE HE MAJORS IN REVERSE PSYCOLOGY.

SIR, WITH ALL DO RESPECT, I DO BELIEVE YOU HAVE A PROBLEM WITH EXADURATING. YOU MAY WANT TO TONE IT DOWN A BIT. I UNDERSTAND THAT YOU ARE NEW TO POSTING AND PROBABLY EXCITED, BUT TRY AND POST SOMETHING USEFUL AND BACK UP YOUR POSTS W/ SOME FACTS., NOT JUST YOUR EXADURATED EXCITEMENT. IF NOT, THATS OK TOO CAUSE YOU HAVE AREADY MADE ME SOME XTRA XMAS CA$H.

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 950
Posted: #16

GB handled the Ravens and they take care of business here,even if it was a short week.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 5818
Posted: #17

Quote Originally Posted by Sandman21403:

Upset Alert:  Chicago playing at home, division game.  Green Bay short week after big Monday nite matchup with the Ravens.  Take Chicago in this game.

VERY BOLD, AND I THINK YOUR WRONG 

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 727
Posted: #18
GB = $
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 1142
Posted: #19
bears -4
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 222
Posted: #20
Da Packers
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 944
Posted: #21
Exaggerated.  Think that's what you were trying to say 808.
I was very confused there.  not being a spelling dick here, I just didn't understand what the hell that word was that you used.


That being said,  I am on GB.  mainly because of the Bears against the pass.  30th in the league.  and GB has good/quiet D.
on paper, it's a mismatch.  on the cold Soldier field (or whatever asinine name it goes by now)  ...in a divisional game...  it could be a totally different story.  still watching line/public.  see it as a FG in the end to win. 


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 109
Posted: #22
packk
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 6405
Posted: #23
Gonna need more than a FG to win it if ya laying 3.5 like I am -- Packers -3.5
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 16
Posted: #24

Ive bet agaianst chicago since the atlanta game except against browns.Cashed everytime!No different today.   Packers          

 

 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 730
Posted: #25
Chicago +3 (+130)
All Forums | Pro Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.