Highest total of the year so far...at 56 and possibly climbing, this total is an automatic UNDER play for me.
Teams have settled down and these high totals are starting to result in unders - there have been four games with totals set at 50 or higher in the last three weeks. All went under the total.
Green Bay has played seven games this year and not one has exceeded 56 points.
New Orleans has played six games, two of which have gone over 56 points - at Atlanta in week 1 and home versus TB in week 5. Both divisional shootouts.
That's two results over 56 points out of thirteen games, which is a 15% outcome. Not great odds there.
Do the road and away math on these two teams and you get a predicted outcome of 47.25 points scored. Do the math on all games combined and you get 51.375 points.
The fact that it is a primetime game does make me a little leery BUT to exceed 56 points you need a minimum of 14 points per quarter just to push...get a 3 or 7 point quarter and all of a sudden you need 24 in the next one.
Final score GB 27 NO 23 for an UNDER 56.
And yes I know the head to head on these two QBs in recent years has been north of 70 PPG. However - that's three games over six years. Going to disregard that stat at my own peril.
GL to all
0
Highest total of the year so far...at 56 and possibly climbing, this total is an automatic UNDER play for me.
Teams have settled down and these high totals are starting to result in unders - there have been four games with totals set at 50 or higher in the last three weeks. All went under the total.
Green Bay has played seven games this year and not one has exceeded 56 points.
New Orleans has played six games, two of which have gone over 56 points - at Atlanta in week 1 and home versus TB in week 5. Both divisional shootouts.
That's two results over 56 points out of thirteen games, which is a 15% outcome. Not great odds there.
Do the road and away math on these two teams and you get a predicted outcome of 47.25 points scored. Do the math on all games combined and you get 51.375 points.
The fact that it is a primetime game does make me a little leery BUT to exceed 56 points you need a minimum of 14 points per quarter just to push...get a 3 or 7 point quarter and all of a sudden you need 24 in the next one.
Final score GB 27 NO 23 for an UNDER 56.
And yes I know the head to head on these two QBs in recent years has been north of 70 PPG. However - that's three games over six years. Going to disregard that stat at my own peril.
GRB will not hold NO to 23 ol in the dome. NO ave. 35 a game at home with Payton behind the bench recently and vs this wanting GRB D. 35 is a min. amount NO will put up.
This game may go under but only because the Saints hold down the Pack.
0
GRB will not hold NO to 23 ol in the dome. NO ave. 35 a game at home with Payton behind the bench recently and vs this wanting GRB D. 35 is a min. amount NO will put up.
This game may go under but only because the Saints hold down the Pack.
GRB will not hold NO to 23 ol in the dome. NO ave. 35 a game at home with Payton behind the bench recently and vs this wanting GRB D. 35 is a min. amount NO will put up.
This game may go under but only because the Saints hold down the Pack.
In what universe are the Saints "recently" averaging 35 points per game at home? Did I not see them "recently" score 20 points hosting the Vikings? THE VIKINGS???
This year's average is 28.5
Last year's average is 27.875
You must be thinking of 2011 when they averaged over 40 points per game. This is not that team. That was in 2011, which was three years ago.
0
Quote Originally Posted by keven vanlith:
GRB will not hold NO to 23 ol in the dome. NO ave. 35 a game at home with Payton behind the bench recently and vs this wanting GRB D. 35 is a min. amount NO will put up.
This game may go under but only because the Saints hold down the Pack.
In what universe are the Saints "recently" averaging 35 points per game at home? Did I not see them "recently" score 20 points hosting the Vikings? THE VIKINGS???
This year's average is 28.5
Last year's average is 27.875
You must be thinking of 2011 when they averaged over 40 points per game. This is not that team. That was in 2011, which was three years ago.
In what universe are the Saints "recently" averaging 35 points per game at home? Did I not see them "recently" score 20 points hosting the Vikings? THE VIKINGS???
This year's average is 28.5
Last year's average is 27.875
You must be thinking of 2011 when they averaged over 40 points per game. This is not that team. That was in 2011, which was three years ago.
Not here to be confrontational and GL on your under Rodney
The Saints scored 272 points at home last year divided by 8 is just under 34.5 pts a game.
Yes their Off. troubled me vs the Vikings after steam rolling the 1st 2 poss. for TDs and doing little after that.
I am playing the Saints huge this week and i think for both you and me the best strat. the Saints can use is running Ingram, Cadet and Robinson at that 31st ranked run D. to keep Aaron off the field and run the clock down.
The Saints are are not the best running team in the league but at home they can be very effective and that makes Brees even that much better, so the saints running game will be our friend this week Rodney and GL again.
0
Quote Originally Posted by omb1:
In what universe are the Saints "recently" averaging 35 points per game at home? Did I not see them "recently" score 20 points hosting the Vikings? THE VIKINGS???
This year's average is 28.5
Last year's average is 27.875
You must be thinking of 2011 when they averaged over 40 points per game. This is not that team. That was in 2011, which was three years ago.
Not here to be confrontational and GL on your under Rodney
The Saints scored 272 points at home last year divided by 8 is just under 34.5 pts a game.
Yes their Off. troubled me vs the Vikings after steam rolling the 1st 2 poss. for TDs and doing little after that.
I am playing the Saints huge this week and i think for both you and me the best strat. the Saints can use is running Ingram, Cadet and Robinson at that 31st ranked run D. to keep Aaron off the field and run the clock down.
The Saints are are not the best running team in the league but at home they can be very effective and that makes Brees even that much better, so the saints running game will be our friend this week Rodney and GL again.
Keven I stand corrected - double checked the numbers and last year comes out to 34 exactly.
I expect a dedicated run game out of both NO and GB. Extended possessions will promote the under.
My original point was that when totals get this high you almost have to take the under as a percentage play. The numbers support this regardless of who's on the field.
GL on your Saints play and on the rest of the season.
0
Keven I stand corrected - double checked the numbers and last year comes out to 34 exactly.
I expect a dedicated run game out of both NO and GB. Extended possessions will promote the under.
My original point was that when totals get this high you almost have to take the under as a percentage play. The numbers support this regardless of who's on the field.
GL on your Saints play and on the rest of the season.
I like the over here. Saints will get some calls in this game due to their record. Maybe a 4th quarter full of fireworks. Looking forward to the Sunday night action. 31 -30 Saints.
0
I like the over here. Saints will get some calls in this game due to their record. Maybe a 4th quarter full of fireworks. Looking forward to the Sunday night action. 31 -30 Saints.
Highest total of the year so far...at 56 and possibly climbing, this total is an automatic UNDER play for me.
Teams have settled down and these high totals are starting to result in unders - there have been four games with totals set at 50 or higher in the last three weeks. All went under the total.
Green Bay has played seven games this year and not one has exceeded 56 points.
New Orleans has played six games, two of which have gone over 56 points - at Atlanta in week 1 and home versus TB in week 5. Both divisional shootouts.
That's two results over 56 points out of thirteen games, which is a 15% outcome. Not great odds there.
Do the road and away math on these two teams and you get a predicted outcome of 47.25 points scored. Do the math on all games combined and you get 51.375 points.
The fact that it is a primetime game does make me a little leery BUT to exceed 56 points you need a minimum of 14 points per quarter just to push...get a 3 or 7 point quarter and all of a sudden you need 24 in the next one.
Final score GB 27 NO 23 for an UNDER 56.
And yes I know the head to head on these two QBs in recent years has been north of 70 PPG. However - that's three games over six years. Going to disregard that stat at my own peril.
GL to all
Another erroneous statement, is that no game set at 50 or higher has gone over. If I recall correctly SD/DEN opened at 50, closed at 51.5 and the final total was 56... which would be over. For me this game is an automatic OVER! Too many people will be scared of the 55-56 total, and will become victims to the dreaded trap. GLTA
0
Quote Originally Posted by omb1:
Highest total of the year so far...at 56 and possibly climbing, this total is an automatic UNDER play for me.
Teams have settled down and these high totals are starting to result in unders - there have been four games with totals set at 50 or higher in the last three weeks. All went under the total.
Green Bay has played seven games this year and not one has exceeded 56 points.
New Orleans has played six games, two of which have gone over 56 points - at Atlanta in week 1 and home versus TB in week 5. Both divisional shootouts.
That's two results over 56 points out of thirteen games, which is a 15% outcome. Not great odds there.
Do the road and away math on these two teams and you get a predicted outcome of 47.25 points scored. Do the math on all games combined and you get 51.375 points.
The fact that it is a primetime game does make me a little leery BUT to exceed 56 points you need a minimum of 14 points per quarter just to push...get a 3 or 7 point quarter and all of a sudden you need 24 in the next one.
Final score GB 27 NO 23 for an UNDER 56.
And yes I know the head to head on these two QBs in recent years has been north of 70 PPG. However - that's three games over six years. Going to disregard that stat at my own peril.
GL to all
Another erroneous statement, is that no game set at 50 or higher has gone over. If I recall correctly SD/DEN opened at 50, closed at 51.5 and the final total was 56... which would be over. For me this game is an automatic OVER! Too many people will be scared of the 55-56 total, and will become victims to the dreaded trap. GLTA
Another erroneous statement, is that no game set at 50 or higher has gone over. If I recall correctly SD/DEN opened at 50, closed at 51.5 and the final total was 56... which would be over. For me this game is an automatic OVER! Too many people will be scared of the 55-56 total, and will become victims to the dreaded trap. GLTA
Originally posted the day before the SD/DEN game, so not erroneous at the time. I was referring to weeks 5-7. Please read more carefully before responding, thanks.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Fingers702:
Another erroneous statement, is that no game set at 50 or higher has gone over. If I recall correctly SD/DEN opened at 50, closed at 51.5 and the final total was 56... which would be over. For me this game is an automatic OVER! Too many people will be scared of the 55-56 total, and will become victims to the dreaded trap. GLTA
Originally posted the day before the SD/DEN game, so not erroneous at the time. I was referring to weeks 5-7. Please read more carefully before responding, thanks.
Originally posted the day before the SD/DEN game, so not erroneous at the time. I was referring to weeks 5-7. Please read more carefully before responding, thanks.
Regardless, it was bogus information. I will gladly bet this over, and think of you the whole time
0
Quote Originally Posted by omb1:
Originally posted the day before the SD/DEN game, so not erroneous at the time. I was referring to weeks 5-7. Please read more carefully before responding, thanks.
Regardless, it was bogus information. I will gladly bet this over, and think of you the whole time
Regardless, it was bogus information. I will gladly bet this over, and think of you the whole time
If you want to be confrontational that's fine but at least have something intelligent to say rather than just blustering that I'm providing "bogus" information. Everything in my original post is 100% fact.
Good luck with your over
0
Quote Originally Posted by Fingers702:
Regardless, it was bogus information. I will gladly bet this over, and think of you the whole time
If you want to be confrontational that's fine but at least have something intelligent to say rather than just blustering that I'm providing "bogus" information. Everything in my original post is 100% fact.
I'm from and live in new orleans and i fully hate to say this but we have no defense,if we do they better wake the f up and stop missing taces. Aaron rogers n lacy r gonna kill us,i see alot of u like the under,if new orleans wins it will not be under,possible green bay n under but if what i have been seeing from my team is true it will be green bay n over, 35-24 possibly up to 31, we have a strond offense but we down to two runnin backs and tbats scary the way players r droppin like flies. Gl guys,I'm leaning towardz green bay but might have to stay out of it,i keyed detroit -1 last week because i knew we dont have a defense,rogers n green bay is twice the beast that detroit is,only thing that can save the saints is the 12th man if thats even possible
0
I'm from and live in new orleans and i fully hate to say this but we have no defense,if we do they better wake the f up and stop missing taces. Aaron rogers n lacy r gonna kill us,i see alot of u like the under,if new orleans wins it will not be under,possible green bay n under but if what i have been seeing from my team is true it will be green bay n over, 35-24 possibly up to 31, we have a strond offense but we down to two runnin backs and tbats scary the way players r droppin like flies. Gl guys,I'm leaning towardz green bay but might have to stay out of it,i keyed detroit -1 last week because i knew we dont have a defense,rogers n green bay is twice the beast that detroit is,only thing that can save the saints is the 12th man if thats even possible
I'm 4-0 today with KC, NE, and two unders that were good. Think Rogers will be the difference in this game. GL all. Taking SF tonight in the world series. Hoping Bumgardner has a great night since I'm getting 10-1 on him as the WS MVP.
0
I'm 4-0 today with KC, NE, and two unders that were good. Think Rogers will be the difference in this game. GL all. Taking SF tonight in the world series. Hoping Bumgardner has a great night since I'm getting 10-1 on him as the WS MVP.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.