All Forums | Pro Football

Green Bay at New York (11/25/2012)

...
Participants:
Search
Views: 16875
Posts: 98
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 361
Posted: #26
Quote Originally Posted by vue21849:

 

Where you been hiding Boy? Where the hell you been hiding since 2007, and then decide to resurface. I don't mind if Sammy jumps on me. He has credibilty, and makes a solid effort on this site. You sir, are a NOBODY to be calling people out. You once made  the comment before on where all the veterans went to. Most of them are on the college threads, and the rest left the NFL threads so they wouldn't have to put up with the childish BS from people like you. And thanks for following me- I take that as a compliment, sc mbag!

Oh believe me - I'm never hiding, son.  I just don't have time for college football where u get a Saturday filled with lopsided matchups only to be followed up with too many politiks after theyre done with the "rankings."  You see son, I'm a 36yr old man / single parent, so I only have time for this thread.  And I also manage to not only understand the NFL ( unlike yourself ), but I also provide reasons behind my picks.  Stop hiding behind your loser picks, Vue and stop promoting your website cuzz you sound like a troll.  And for the sake of maturity, please remove the hot chick as your profile picture.  That's something a high school kid does cuzz he can't score with any bitches.  Now rack 'em, loser.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 5051
Posted: #27
Quote Originally Posted by joedaddy76:

Oh believe me - I'm never hiding, son.  I just don't have time for college football where u get a Saturday filled with lopsided matchups only to be followed up with too many politiks after theyre done with the "rankings."  You see son, I'm a 36yr old man / single parent, so I only have time for this thread.  And I also manage to not only understand the NFL ( unlike yourself ), but I also provide reasons behind my picks.  Stop hiding behind your loser picks, Vue and stop promoting your website cuzz you sound like a troll.  And for the sake of maturity, please remove the hot chick as your profile picture.  That's something a high school kid does cuzz he can't score with any bitches.  Now rack 'em, loser.

Hey , you were the one slinging cheap shots pal! Where do you get off dictating how others should conduct their business?  I'm 63 - but so what!  36 yrs old don't make you a man, taking responsibilty for your actions and treating other with respect, is what's its' about. Personally, I don't give a damn if you like me, my style, but don't bash my NFL record on these threads. Year in and year out I've shown a profit. Admittingly, it's not huge, but then I'm a  recreational player. If you and people like to write huge writeups on why you're picking a side, be my guess. I prefer to handicap the games, and then present the finish product. Either way is valid. I could talk handicapping, but then I'd have people like you saying that my way is not valid. Final results is ALL THAT COUNTS! Of course, we could raise the truce flag, both stop our bashing, and peacefully co exist in a separate worlds. Or then if you persist in trolling and harrassing, I'll bring it to Covers, and let them deal with you. Your choice, my friend.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 332
Posted: #28
Quote Originally Posted by joedaddy76:

I really appreciate Sammy Ace calling out Covers biggest doosh aka Vue for never giving a decent analysis or providing any good reason for alot of his loser picks.  Just wish guys like Vue would leave Covers and stick to managing that counter at 7-11.


LMAO
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 5051
Posted: #29

Quote Originally Posted by radids:

Well i must agree with VUE here i believe the Packs will win and cover in this game, still there is a fair chance for a great game that can change directions at any given point during the match, we need to acknowledge Packs vs Giants on the field it is indeed a tough one here. Anyways VUE one question, if you were to choose 8 lines for a parlay what will this lines be? Happy holidays all and GL for the weekend.

Sorry, I don't play teasers or parlays, only sides (ATS) and totals, GL.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 3274
Posted: #30
sammyace.............gmen was gonna be my top pick for this weekend...i agree with your analysis...giants can dominate defensively and pound the ball down ur throats... eli is still one of the best clutch qbs in the nfl. after losing 2 straight games ...im pretty sure the gmen is ready to get a big win at home agianst the pack. gmen coming off a bye doesnt hurt either.   As much as i love rodgers.. i just see him  getting sacked left and right this sunday night....giants is still the REAL team to beat if teams want a ticket to the SB.  GMEN -3 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 2635
Posted: #31

       When Push comes to  shove
RED FLAG
Public  hammering Pack yet line has gone from Blue - 1 to  -3
""
 Blue scored 37 @ Lambeau LY facing healthy corners and Sackmaster Mathews.
Difference between now and then ?
Woodson,Mathews and Jennings are out leaving Rookie Casey Hayward n'  D. House  on corners to contain Cruz,Nicks n' Bennett .
Making things worst ,Packs O Line has allowed record # of  hits on Rodgers thru 11 weeks . Following Blues players meeting revealing call to increase sack % it would appear Weak Pack O line will be hard pressed to do better than 4 sacks they allowed LY vs Blue.
After barely beating Lions on the road LW , facing divisional game next week , not sold on Pack to " Embarrass " blue as one suggests.
What does concern however is Eli's sudden cold streak which a bye does not necessarily equate into a turn around , however besides facing a Saints or Skins secondary , Hurting Pack D n' Corners should allow Eli to achieve similar  330 yrds 3 TD 1 INT  performance vs Pack LY.
On a personal note, Amazes me how many so called cappers can't figure out  degree of consistent success Blue has when Push comes to shove facing Playoff caliber teams via rematch scenario.
Case and Point : Giants destroyed Frisco TY . 
Sure enough, So called  capper , as square as they come, called out Frisco to crush and embarrass Blue based on revenge factor  . 
Deja Vue ? Could be , but damn when does a foot become tired of entering one's mouth !?
lol
Obscure trend : Last 5 years Giants have lost only 2 times prior to Skin Matchup..Both losses were to  Packers !
Giants avg 30 Pts at home to Packs 26 on the road and with these gunslingers it's really anybody's game. Way better games than this to pick sides, however  OVER appears to be the more sensible and  logical choice with the OVER @ a perfect 5 - 0 last 5 meetings.

GIANTS 33 PACK 24

 BOLA

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 2635
Posted: #32
Quote Originally Posted by Sammy_Ace:

The only embarrassing thing I see is your record against the spread last week.  If you're gonna post a pick, why don't you do us all a favor and give us your rationale for liking a particular side or total. 
First of all Sammy I must set the record straight :
For reasons of compliance with Covers , Person in question will exclusively be forever known as  :   = O
In O 's  defense  , I  must correct you :  
Week 10 , O  had a winning week at 9 - 7 ... However ,reason being for all the controversy directed at O from various members ,
 O Has in FACT only 3 winning weeks up to date :  10 - 6 - 1 Week 1....
9 - 7 - 2 Week  3  and 9 - 7 Week  10.
I can guarantee that O 's  NFL  record stands at 72 - 74 - 4 for the year . HOWEVER  O has been riding quite a dry spell since week 3 going 43 - 56 - 2 with an alarming 18 out of 43 success rate on sides.
It is evident that while some cappers as myself are NOT into recreational gambling, it appears evident by checking O 's personal page that O seems to be suffering from a unique form of attention deficiency that renders him mostly concerned with matters of missing rating stars and missing tittie avatars  over money matters , which is why we are all here :
TO CONTRIBUTE VALID AND INTELLIGIBLE GAME RELATED INSIGHT to make  $$$ ! So while it's  O 's  prerogative to regularly commit Cardinal Capper sin  attempting to pick 30 + College games in a day resulting in a catastrophic 13 out of 31 on week 2 ,
it comes as no surprise that members as myself tend to resent 0's posts  containing more facts about his age and bogus record than posting insight on games. Proof positive that at 63 , quantity does not equate quality as one can see through O 's posts in this game page.
Sammy Ace, your posts ,win or lose are clear ,bringing insight and different perspectives ,far from the drivel O claims it to be.
I salute you and few others regardless of Covers Rookie or Legend ?       ( lol) status ,sticking thru the BS and posting value info that can bring one closer to a correct choice.
Covers has come a long way in recent years from Clovers and Icon picks with more members posting intelligible insight helping some to make critical cash decisions. 
As for myself, I see absolutely no " Value input" regarding  0 's  double hand  job posts     and occasional  Dim witted drivel such as " Bad coaching breeds bad teams"...No garbage !!! lol  
Sammy,Throughout the years,it's about all the rationale you can expect to get from  
Not Bashing,just stating facts.
BOLA
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 2635
Posted: #33
Correction :   ' s  NFL YTD  Record :   72 - 77 - 4  not  72 - 74 - 4
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 296
Posted: #34
Never meant to cause any controversy fellas. I write my posts because l find that it helps me make better decisions and I hope it helps everyone. I got a little emotional the other day when I heard someone say my Gmen were going to get embarrassed Sunday night. Never meant to start a war of words, and from now on I will strictly focus on the games.

I really liked EasyPicks rationale for liking the Gmen, and I will be pulling for the Giants big time for both personal and financial reasons!

Good luck fellas

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 7
Posted: #35
Quote Originally Posted by vue21849:

Sorry, I don't play teasers or parlays, only sides (ATS) and totals, GL.

Great i like totals , im a young player starting to see some profits however got on a whole the last two weeks so im looking for advice from the wise men from Cover threads, so if you have any piece of advice for Sunday ill be happy to put some money behind it. Cheers!!! I really like all of your inputs guys excellent advice all the way long.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 936
Posted: #36
Giants
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 361
Posted: #37
Quote Originally Posted by vue21849:

Hey , you were the one slinging cheap shots pal! Where do you get off dictating how others should conduct their business?  I'm 63 - but so what!  36 yrs old don't make you a man, taking responsibilty for your actions and treating other with respect, is what's its' about. Personally, I don't give a damn if you like me, my style, but don't bash my NFL record on these threads. Year in and year out I've shown a profit. Admittingly, it's not huge, but then I'm a  recreational player. If you and people like to write huge writeups on why you're picking a side, be my guess. I prefer to handicap the games, and then present the finish product. Either way is valid. I could talk handicapping, but then I'd have people like you saying that my way is not valid. Final results is ALL THAT COUNTS! Of course, we could raise the truce flag, both stop our bashing, and peacefully co exist in a separate worlds. Or then if you persist in trolling and harrassing, I'll bring it to Covers, and let them deal with you. Your choice, my friend.

Once again, u do not expain why u rarely back any of ur picks with any sort of decent analysis bro.  Im not tryin to bash u.  Im just calling out facts.  And im glad that sammy has called u out on the same thing cuzz it proves that im not the only one who's annoyed by ur meaningless posts.  dude - if ur in ur 60s then id expect u to have something to say about ur picks.  but u dont.  u sound like one of them retired losers who bets on everything from college football to college baseball.  Provide some Reason behind your picks.  That's all we ask.  Otherwise, go  take a nap and leave this thread alone u old codger.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 361
Posted: #38
Quote Originally Posted by vue21849:

   The G-men will never know what just ran over them!  Might prove to be a  bit of an embarrasment on Prime Time.

GREEN BAY  +  2.5

I really don't need to provide my analysis with this loser's "handshake" picture.  He never has any good reason to backup his picks.  I know robots with more analysis than him.

G-Men will not lose 3 in a row.  Vue along with other d-bags forgot that this is the Super Bowl Championship Team.  Giants will give Rodgers alot of trouble especially since Packers have a weak behind running game.

GMen All Day. 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 2089
Posted: #39
Giants and over for the large. Eli gets out of slump
If you’re not large, you’re small - the DOC
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 376
Posted: #40
The GIANTS are in the same boat as they were last year coming into this game with two back to back lost  an GB on a winning streak the line havent jump or did i miss something .The SB champs favorite by 3  with a bad home record out of this world i like GB in this close cover
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 5051
Posted: #41
    If some of you feel like bashing me- I really don't have a problem but for God's sake stop misrepresenting my NFL record on Covers: As of the start before this Sunday's games on both sides & totals it is: 99-84-6  54.10% Thank you & GL on the games!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 296
Posted: #42
Quote Originally Posted by holtnt:



Sammy_Ace,

 

 

The outcome of that game would have been completely different if CK was under center (That entire offensive unit played with an extra pep in their step with CK taking snaps)…

 

At any rate, leaning towards Aaron Rodgers plus the field goal…  Waiting closer to game time to lock up a play… 


CK is the man. If you saw my post for last week's monday night game, I was all over backing kaepernick and the 49ers.  he made me a lot of money running the pistol at nevada, and the 49ers must think very highly of him as well to take him in the 2nd round.  

but with all that being said, i really feel the giants are the play here or no play at all. its hard for me to be impartial bc im such a big giants fan, but i really think you have to stay away from green bay given all the injuries on the defensive side of the ball (matthews, woodson, shields, and nate perry). There couldn''t be a better team for the Giants to face to break out of this midseason funk and get their swagger back.  

Who knows, maybe I'm fade material this week.  But these are typically the games and situations when I like to take the Giants. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 2635
Posted: #43
Left over Food Thoughts for Blue Backers

Under Coughlin regime last 6 years, Blue has won all post bye games except for 2
Both being against hated Divisional CowBlows 4 + 6 years ago.
+
Last 8 years Pack have lost all post Road Lions game except for 2
Both against NFC East Blue n' CowBs.
(Last year ,under unique scheduling Deja Vue)
Pack @ Giants beat Blue following 
Win  @ Detroit. 

RED FLAG II

Well known how Bad Cowblows are under national spotlight . Flip side success, Pack in recent years are quite explosive and dominant under lights.
+
As previously mentioned 
Blue tend to pick it up a notch, playing at level of competition. 
( Those who point  Bungel loss to cap this game  )
 Giants always play bad 
@ Cinci ZZZZZZ ... would'nt U ?
lol
+
Giants are undoubtedly one of NFL's Best Road Warriors.Unfortunately,
No such thing as Home Sweet Meadowlands Home.

To fellow Blues, Sammy too,always tough betting on own. Not much worse than sitting at a game betting with heart , losing 42 K in not so super bowl 99 .
Word of wisdom specifically aimed at  beginners : Matters of heart via Football or Love can  
Lesson learned, since 99 have lost 3 Super Bowls ,staying Far from sentimental , heartfelt wagers.

OVER May be best Bet, featuring Gunslingin' National Showdown.

Just saying $ 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 2635
Posted: #44
Speaking of deja  ... truth be told :

FORUM PICKS :

Week 1 : 10 - 6 - 1
Week 2 : 6 - 8
Week 3 : 9-7-2
Week 4 :8-6
Week 5: 4 - 11
Week 6: 4 - 9
Week 7 : 7-8
Week 8: 5-3
Week 9 : 6-8-1
Week 10 : 9 - 7
Week 11: 4-4

Not Bashing,Just facts. 

For reasons of decency ,NOT going to   's College Picks % 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 21783
Posted: #45
Sure the Gmen are smarting and also coming off a bye "BUT",, this game is really not that important to them because their division stinks. Packers want this game more and i think they are mo hungrier and the value is on dem here.

Packers +2.5
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 6791
Posted: #46
NY Giants -3 LARGE
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 777
Posted: #47
Giants coming off their bye...its do or die time....Packers should have lost to the Lions, they are Thankful the Lions have that idiot coaching them......no run game for the Pack and Rodgers gets beat up today...my biggest play of the day, Giants by 10!!!!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 8713
Posted: #48
Green Bay
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 51
Posted: #49
[Quote: Originally Posted by Sammy_Ace]
Lol.  I finally got you to respond to a post.  Good luck and happy thanksgiving vue. You still didn't explain why you like the Pack?  What good is a pick if it doesn't come with an explanation?  Are we supposed to trust your nerdy database?  
[/Quote

For Vue

His name is Sammy "the fuc&ing" Ace!!!  


 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 2089
Posted: #50
Lets finish off a big week W8!!! For da LAHHHGGEEEE!!!!!!
If you’re not large, you’re small - the DOC
All Forums | Pro Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
Covers Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.