• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • NFL Prediction Prices
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
      • Politics
        • Back
        • Politics
        • Politics Home
        • Presidential Election Odds
        • Midterm Election Odds
        • House Midterm Odds
        • Senate Midterm Odds
        • Texas Midterm Odds
        • Michigan Midterm Odds
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 7
      NFL Week 7
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Pro Football

    Green Bay at New York (11/25/2012)

    1234 Next Last»
    Covers
    Sammy_Ace
    coolcat
    vue21849
    LITLBILL0903
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 16875
    Posts: 98
    1234 Next Last»
     
    Covers
    Covers
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2002
    Posts: 61
    Posted: Nov. 20, 2012 - 12:36 AM ET #1

    Away:  Green Bay [5-5 ATS]
    Home:  N.Y. Giants [4-5-1 ATS]

    Game Time: 8:20 PM
    Stadium: MetLife Stadium

    Recent Meetings:
    N/A

    Team Leaders:

    Green Bay:
    Passing: Aaron Rodgers (2619)
    Rushing: Alex Green (272)
    Receiving: Jordy Nelson (577)

    N.Y. Giants:
    Passing: Eli Manning (2641)
    Rushing: Ahmad Bradshaw (675)
    Receiving: Victor Cruz (743)

    More:
    Live Odds
    In-Depth Matchup Information
    Consensus Betting Information

    Reply
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.

    Away:  Green Bay [5-5 ATS]
    Home:  N.Y. Giants [4-5-1 ATS]

    Game Time: 8:20 PM
    Stadium: MetLife Stadium

    Recent Meetings:
    N/A

    Team Leaders:

    Green Bay:
    Passing: Aaron Rodgers (2619)
    Rushing: Alex Green (272)
    Receiving: Jordy Nelson (577)

    N.Y. Giants:
    Passing: Eli Manning (2641)
    Rushing: Ahmad Bradshaw (675)
    Receiving: Victor Cruz (743)

    More:
    Live Odds
    In-Depth Matchup Information
    Consensus Betting Information

     
    Sammy_Ace
    Sammy_Ace
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2012
    Posts: 296
    Posted: Nov. 20, 2012 - 11:53 AM ET #2

    I told everyone the GMEN were fade material prior to their road game versus the Bengals. My experience in situational betting told me that the game spelt trouble for the Giants. The Giants were recently dominated up front by the Pittsburgh Steelers and playing some lousy football on both sides of the ball. The Bengals, on the other hand, were also reeling and needed to right their ship as they had lost 4 consecutive games (their last two being at home). The Bengals simply needed and wanted it more, and the Giants wanted a bye week to lick their wounds.    

    Well, this week I am going to zig zag my way back on the Super Bowl Champion Giants. The talk of the town in both the New York and national media has been the "soft" Giant defense and the "dead arm" of Eli Manning. I don't get it, is Eli pitching for the Yankees? This talk has been largely exaggerated, and the bottom line is that its a long season filled with peaks and valleys. The Giants were a bit fatigued and needed to hit the reset button, and the bye week couldn't have come at a better time. Eli actually spent some time with familly in Mississippi, and I'm sure some home cooking did him some good.

    I've taken a very close look at the last two matchups between these two teams. The Giants beat down the Packers in Green Bay in the divisional round last year. And the Gmen should have won the regular season matchup at MetLife Stadium in December of last year. There was some controversial officiating in that matchup and it took a last second fg from Mason Crosby for the Pack to win the game 38-35 (Crosby has looked awful lately). In that regular season matchup, Clay Matthews also had a 40 yard pick-6 (I am not sure what his status will be Sunday Night).

    Now everyone will talk about the "revenge factor" and the public is going to be all over the underdog Packers for this reason and because the public just loves Aaron Rodgers. I am going to tell you that "revenge" is a highly overrated factor when determining the outcome of a game. Just look at what the Giants did to the 49ers earlier this year. Shouldn't the 49ers have avenged their loss from the NFC Championship Game?? The Giants have also heard Clay Matthews make public comments that Green Bay beat themselves in the playoffs last year, and that they are the better team. Both teams will definitely have something to prove this Sunday. Not to mention, the Giants had a full bye week of listening to how soft their defense is, and how Eli has "a dead arm". 

    The matchups are far more important in predicting the outcome of this game. The Giants achilles heel, in my opinion, is the middle of their defense (middle linebacker and defensive tackle). Thats why the Steelers had so much success running the ball against them. The Giants defensive line is very athletic, but I think most would agree that they are better pass rushers then they are run-stoppers. Now in come the high flying Packers, with absolutly no running game whatsoever (24th ranked in the league). In fact in the last two matchups, Aaron Rodgers led the team in rushing for both games!!!  Are you kidding me Green Bay? That stinks of weakness. With the injury to Cedric Benson, this team has had very little success running the ball, and that is music to the Giants ears. While the Giants secondary is far from an elite unit, the Giants defense would much rather pin their ears back and rush the passer, and take their chances with their average secondary making a play on a ball. 

    Green Bay will of course also be without the services of Charles Woodson and I have been patiently waiting for an opportunity like this to fade them. I really wanted to take Detroit last week, but I was afraid of the Lions self destructing and beating themselves (which predicatably happened again). I don't see that happening with Tom Coughlin's team coming off the bye this week.  

    I look for Eli and the Giants offense to get back on track against a depleted Packer defense that will be playing a back-to-back road game. I also think the Giants defense bends, but doesn't break, and creates a couple turnovers against the pass-happy Pack. I also wouldn't be surprised if the Pack get an unexpected dose of the Giants explosive rookie, David Wilson. This bye week might have been a good opportunity for Couglin to work on pass protection with the young back, and I would not pay too much attention to Ahmad Bradshaw's status on the injury report.

    I am going large on my hometown GMEN!  Lets go BIG BLUE!!!!                     

    Reply

    I told everyone the GMEN were fade material prior to their road game versus the Bengals. My experience in situational betting told me that the game spelt trouble for the Giants. The Giants were recently dominated up front by the Pittsburgh Steelers and playing some lousy football on both sides of the ball. The Bengals, on the other hand, were also reeling and needed to right their ship as they had lost 4 consecutive games (their last two being at home). The Bengals simply needed and wanted it more, and the Giants wanted a bye week to lick their wounds.    

    Well, this week I am going to zig zag my way back on the Super Bowl Champion Giants. The talk of the town in both the New York and national media has been the "soft" Giant defense and the "dead arm" of Eli Manning. I don't get it, is Eli pitching for the Yankees? This talk has been largely exaggerated, and the bottom line is that its a long season filled with peaks and valleys. The Giants were a bit fatigued and needed to hit the reset button, and the bye week couldn't have come at a better time. Eli actually spent some time with familly in Mississippi, and I'm sure some home cooking did him some good.

    I've taken a very close look at the last two matchups between these two teams. The Giants beat down the Packers in Green Bay in the divisional round last year. And the Gmen should have won the regular season matchup at MetLife Stadium in December of last year. There was some controversial officiating in that matchup and it took a last second fg from Mason Crosby for the Pack to win the game 38-35 (Crosby has looked awful lately). In that regular season matchup, Clay Matthews also had a 40 yard pick-6 (I am not sure what his status will be Sunday Night).

    Now everyone will talk about the "revenge factor" and the public is going to be all over the underdog Packers for this reason and because the public just loves Aaron Rodgers. I am going to tell you that "revenge" is a highly overrated factor when determining the outcome of a game. Just look at what the Giants did to the 49ers earlier this year. Shouldn't the 49ers have avenged their loss from the NFC Championship Game?? The Giants have also heard Clay Matthews make public comments that Green Bay beat themselves in the playoffs last year, and that they are the better team. Both teams will definitely have something to prove this Sunday. Not to mention, the Giants had a full bye week of listening to how soft their defense is, and how Eli has "a dead arm". 

    The matchups are far more important in predicting the outcome of this game. The Giants achilles heel, in my opinion, is the middle of their defense (middle linebacker and defensive tackle). Thats why the Steelers had so much success running the ball against them. The Giants defensive line is very athletic, but I think most would agree that they are better pass rushers then they are run-stoppers. Now in come the high flying Packers, with absolutly no running game whatsoever (24th ranked in the league). In fact in the last two matchups, Aaron Rodgers led the team in rushing for both games!!!  Are you kidding me Green Bay? That stinks of weakness. With the injury to Cedric Benson, this team has had very little success running the ball, and that is music to the Giants ears. While the Giants secondary is far from an elite unit, the Giants defense would much rather pin their ears back and rush the passer, and take their chances with their average secondary making a play on a ball. 

    Green Bay will of course also be without the services of Charles Woodson and I have been patiently waiting for an opportunity like this to fade them. I really wanted to take Detroit last week, but I was afraid of the Lions self destructing and beating themselves (which predicatably happened again). I don't see that happening with Tom Coughlin's team coming off the bye this week.  

    I look for Eli and the Giants offense to get back on track against a depleted Packer defense that will be playing a back-to-back road game. I also think the Giants defense bends, but doesn't break, and creates a couple turnovers against the pass-happy Pack. I also wouldn't be surprised if the Pack get an unexpected dose of the Giants explosive rookie, David Wilson. This bye week might have been a good opportunity for Couglin to work on pass protection with the young back, and I would not pay too much attention to Ahmad Bradshaw's status on the injury report.

    I am going large on my hometown GMEN!  Lets go BIG BLUE!!!!                     

     
    coolcat
    coolcat
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 313
    Posted: Nov. 21, 2012 - 1:50 AM ET #3

    Green Bay Packers + 2.5 the dog of the week...
    Reply
    Green Bay Packers + 2.5 the dog of the week...
     
    vue21849
    vue21849
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2008
    Posts: 5051
    Posted: Nov. 21, 2012 - 3:38 PM ET #4

       The G-men will never know what just ran over them!  Might prove to be a  bit of an embarrasment on Prime Time.

    GREEN BAY  +  2.5

    Reply

       The G-men will never know what just ran over them!  Might prove to be a  bit of an embarrasment on Prime Time.

    GREEN BAY  +  2.5

     
    Sammy_Ace
    Sammy_Ace
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2012
    Posts: 296
    Posted: Nov. 21, 2012 - 3:54 PM ET #5

    Quote Originally Posted by vue21849:

       The G-men will never know what just ran over them!  Might prove to be a  bit of an embarrasment on Prime Time.

    GREEN BAY  +  2.5

    The only embarrassing thing I see is your record against the spread last week.  If you're gonna post a pick, why don't you do us all a favor and give us your rationale for liking a particular side or total. 
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by vue21849:

       The G-men will never know what just ran over them!  Might prove to be a  bit of an embarrasment on Prime Time.

    GREEN BAY  +  2.5

    The only embarrassing thing I see is your record against the spread last week.  If you're gonna post a pick, why don't you do us all a favor and give us your rationale for liking a particular side or total. 
     
    LITLBILL0903
    LITLBILL0903
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2012
    Posts: 29
    Posted: Nov. 21, 2012 - 4:09 PM ET #6

    No Clay Matthews...Sam Shields probably not going to be back this week...no Jennings as usual.

    Giants -3

    Reply
    No Clay Matthews...Sam Shields probably not going to be back this week...no Jennings as usual.

    Giants -3

     
    best_bets
    best_bets
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2006
    Posts: 8334
    Posted: Nov. 21, 2012 - 6:02 PM ET #7

    Giants been playing bad of late..........embarassing themselves.

    Packers been playing good of late........winning ugly.

    Which team do you buy stock in? I see a trend.

    Reply

    Giants been playing bad of late..........embarassing themselves.

    Packers been playing good of late........winning ugly.

    Which team do you buy stock in? I see a trend.

     
    toddwins
    toddwins
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2003
    Posts: 355
    Posted: Nov. 21, 2012 - 7:01 PM ET #8

    this game is giving me headaches.......no pick
    Reply
    this game is giving me headaches.......no pick
     
    vue21849
    vue21849
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2008
    Posts: 5051
    Posted: Nov. 21, 2012 - 8:50 PM ET #9

    Quote Originally Posted by Sammy_Ace:

    The only embarrassing thing I see is your record against the spread last week.  If you're gonna post a pick, why don't you do us all a favor and give us your rationale for liking a particular side or total. 

        

    4-3 is embarrassing. It's equally embarrassing when you come on here with your 90 something posts spouting a textbooks worth of drivel, that doesn't mean squat when you lose. Stop coming on these threads like your a freakin' expert. Been doing the game before you were born, Son!

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Sammy_Ace:

    The only embarrassing thing I see is your record against the spread last week.  If you're gonna post a pick, why don't you do us all a favor and give us your rationale for liking a particular side or total. 

        

    4-3 is embarrassing. It's equally embarrassing when you come on here with your 90 something posts spouting a textbooks worth of drivel, that doesn't mean squat when you lose. Stop coming on these threads like your a freakin' expert. Been doing the game before you were born, Son!

     
    Sammy_Ace
    Sammy_Ace
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2012
    Posts: 296
    Posted: Nov. 21, 2012 - 10:01 PM ET #10

    Quote Originally Posted by vue21849:

        

    4-3 is embarrassing. It's equally embarrassing when you come on here with your 90 something posts spouting a textbooks worth of drivel, that doesn't mean squat when you lose. Stop coming on these threads like your a freakin' expert. Been doing the game before you were born, Son!

    Lol.  I finally got you to respond to a post.  Good luck and happy thanksgiving vue. You still didn't explain why you like the Pack?  What good is a pick if it doesn't come with an explanation?  Are we supposed to trust your nerdy database?  
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by vue21849:

        

    4-3 is embarrassing. It's equally embarrassing when you come on here with your 90 something posts spouting a textbooks worth of drivel, that doesn't mean squat when you lose. Stop coming on these threads like your a freakin' expert. Been doing the game before you were born, Son!

    Lol.  I finally got you to respond to a post.  Good luck and happy thanksgiving vue. You still didn't explain why you like the Pack?  What good is a pick if it doesn't come with an explanation?  Are we supposed to trust your nerdy database?  
     
    Sammy_Ace
    Sammy_Ace
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2012
    Posts: 296
    Posted: Nov. 21, 2012 - 10:18 PM ET #11

    And by the way, I went 4-1 last week. I took the bills, cardinals, rams, and 49ers & wrote really long explanations on why I liked each one.  I think most people appreciate my take.  We all make mistakes in this game, it's impossible to be perfect.  
    Reply
    And by the way, I went 4-1 last week. I took the bills, cardinals, rams, and 49ers & wrote really long explanations on why I liked each one.  I think most people appreciate my take.  We all make mistakes in this game, it's impossible to be perfect.  
     
    Row007
    Row007
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2012
    Posts: 1
    Posted: Nov. 22, 2012 - 1:03 AM ET #12

    Sammy_Ace. I look forward and appreciate  your explanation on each game. Please keep up the good work and continue doing what you do!!!
    Reply
    Sammy_Ace. I look forward and appreciate  your explanation on each game. Please keep up the good work and continue doing what you do!!!
     
    Topo
    Topo
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2012
    Posts: 271
    Posted: Nov. 22, 2012 - 1:04 AM ET #13

    These teams are roughly equal when playing well, but Eli has been mired in a slump lately.  I don't think GB is an easy team to break out of slump against, so I would lean on the Packers moneyline here.  At the very least, 2.34 is nice value in a game that is probably 50-50 for a winner.
    Reply
    These teams are roughly equal when playing well, but Eli has been mired in a slump lately.  I don't think GB is an easy team to break out of slump against, so I would lean on the Packers moneyline here.  At the very least, 2.34 is nice value in a game that is probably 50-50 for a winner.
     
    ewillie169
    ewillie169
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2008
    Posts: 984
    Posted: Nov. 22, 2012 - 2:18 AM ET #14

    GB +2.5 (.5u) - with something brewing with Manning's arm, there'll probably more running than usual. I'm betting the edge goes to Rogers vs. the Giant secondary.  Even tho the gman are coming off a bye at home facing a Mathews/Woodsen-less Pack, I'm siding with the Pack anyway. SCORE: Packers 24 - Giants 21.
    Reply
    GB +2.5 (.5u) - with something brewing with Manning's arm, there'll probably more running than usual. I'm betting the edge goes to Rogers vs. the Giant secondary.  Even tho the gman are coming off a bye at home facing a Mathews/Woodsen-less Pack, I'm siding with the Pack anyway. SCORE: Packers 24 - Giants 21.
     
    VEGASRKNZ
    VEGASRKNZ
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2011
    Posts: 86
    Posted: Nov. 22, 2012 - 2:33 AM ET #15

    Packers  +2.5
    Reply
    Packers  +2.5
     
    nepatriots_12
    nepatriots_12
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2008
    Posts: 2304
    Posted: Nov. 22, 2012 - 3:33 AM ET #16

    Quote Originally Posted by Sammy_Ace:

    And by the way, I went 4-1 last week. I took the bills, cardinals, rams, and 49ers & wrote really long explanations on why I liked each one.  I think most people appreciate my take.  We all make mistakes in this game, it's impossible to be perfect.  

    Great thoughts Sammy. Like the Giants also for the same reasons you do. Disrespected defending champs, bye week to refocus. Gmen get back on track here with a big statement win. 

    Love reading your thoughts every week, any opinion on the Atl/TB game? I think the Bucs come up big at home in a massive divisional tilt.


    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Sammy_Ace:

    And by the way, I went 4-1 last week. I took the bills, cardinals, rams, and 49ers & wrote really long explanations on why I liked each one.  I think most people appreciate my take.  We all make mistakes in this game, it's impossible to be perfect.  

    Great thoughts Sammy. Like the Giants also for the same reasons you do. Disrespected defending champs, bye week to refocus. Gmen get back on track here with a big statement win. 

    Love reading your thoughts every week, any opinion on the Atl/TB game? I think the Bucs come up big at home in a massive divisional tilt.


     
    joedaddy76
    joedaddy76
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2007
    Posts: 361
    Posted: Nov. 22, 2012 - 3:52 PM ET #17

    I really appreciate Sammy Ace calling out Covers biggest doosh aka Vue for never giving a decent analysis or providing any good reason for alot of his loser picks.  Just wish guys like Vue would leave Covers and stick to managing that counter at 7-11.

    Reply

    I really appreciate Sammy Ace calling out Covers biggest doosh aka Vue for never giving a decent analysis or providing any good reason for alot of his loser picks.  Just wish guys like Vue would leave Covers and stick to managing that counter at 7-11.

     
    vue21849
    vue21849
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2008
    Posts: 5051
    Posted: Nov. 22, 2012 - 9:12 PM ET #18

    Quote Originally Posted by joedaddy76:

    I really appreciate Sammy Ace calling out Covers biggest doosh aka Vue for never giving a decent analysis or providing any good reason for alot of his loser picks.  Just wish guys like Vue would leave Covers and stick to managing that counter at 7-11.

     

    Where you been hiding Boy? Where the hell you been hiding since 2007, and then decide to resurface. I don't mind if Sammy jumps on me. He has credibilty, and makes a solid effort on this site. You sir, are a NOBODY to be calling people out. You once made  the comment before on where all the veterans went to. Most of them are on the college threads, and the rest left the NFL threads so they wouldn't have to put up with the childish BS from people like you. And thanks for following me- I take that as a compliment, sc mbag!

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by joedaddy76:

    I really appreciate Sammy Ace calling out Covers biggest doosh aka Vue for never giving a decent analysis or providing any good reason for alot of his loser picks.  Just wish guys like Vue would leave Covers and stick to managing that counter at 7-11.

     

    Where you been hiding Boy? Where the hell you been hiding since 2007, and then decide to resurface. I don't mind if Sammy jumps on me. He has credibilty, and makes a solid effort on this site. You sir, are a NOBODY to be calling people out. You once made  the comment before on where all the veterans went to. Most of them are on the college threads, and the rest left the NFL threads so they wouldn't have to put up with the childish BS from people like you. And thanks for following me- I take that as a compliment, sc mbag!

     
    vue21849
    vue21849
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2008
    Posts: 5051
    Posted: Nov. 22, 2012 - 9:36 PM ET #19

    Quote Originally Posted by Sammy_Ace:

    Lol.  I finally got you to respond to a post.  Good luck and happy thanksgiving vue. You still didn't explain why you like the Pack?  What good is a pick if it doesn't come with an explanation?  Are we supposed to trust your nerdy database?  

    Hey Sammy,  nobody tears a game apart, & analyizes it better than you! Hell son, I even enjoy reading them. And yes, you and the other doubters should believe in my database. It only happens to be one of the most respected, commercially available ones in the country. It's run by a professional capper, and he even has bookies, using it. Hoped you enjoyed your turkey!

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Sammy_Ace:

    Lol.  I finally got you to respond to a post.  Good luck and happy thanksgiving vue. You still didn't explain why you like the Pack?  What good is a pick if it doesn't come with an explanation?  Are we supposed to trust your nerdy database?  

    Hey Sammy,  nobody tears a game apart, & analyizes it better than you! Hell son, I even enjoy reading them. And yes, you and the other doubters should believe in my database. It only happens to be one of the most respected, commercially available ones in the country. It's run by a professional capper, and he even has bookies, using it. Hoped you enjoyed your turkey!

     
    mellowman7883
    mellowman7883
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2010
    Posts: 746
    Posted: Nov. 22, 2012 - 9:47 PM ET #20

    There is much more value on some of these totals and sides on different games for me to think about betting this game. Way to many variables here. Obstaining on this.
    Reply
    There is much more value on some of these totals and sides on different games for me to think about betting this game. Way to many variables here. Obstaining on this.
     
    TheQuadYeah
    TheQuadYeah
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2010
    Posts: 1827
    Posted: Nov. 22, 2012 - 11:16 PM ET #21

    Quote Originally Posted by Sammy_Ace:

    Lol.  I finally got you to respond to a post.  Good luck and happy thanksgiving vue. You still didn't explain why you like the Pack?  What good is a pick if it doesn't come with an explanation?  Are we supposed to trust your nerdy database?  

    Despite all of the "In House" arguing in this thread (isn't it always us against the books???)

    I'm inclined to take the Packers and the points. Why, you ask???

    First off, where's their running game?? The one-two punch of Bradshaw and Jacobs has lost a lot of it's luster, since Jacobs left for the Niners, hasn't it?

    Secondly, I think Eli is missing his key receivers that left - with Hixon and Nicks dinged up pretty much all season, who does he have to rely on besides Victor Cruz? How great would it be to have a Manningham, or a Steve Smith, or when they had the chance at Plaxico Burress? Yes, Plaxico Burress.......

    Thirdly - Andy Dalton just picked this secondary apart - -  21/30, 200 yards and 4 TD's, no picks................... Andy Dalton.......... of the Bungles............... Andy...................... Dalton...............

     So, what do you think last year's MVP Aaron Rodgers will do to this secondary???????????

    See, we all don't need an encyclopedia's worth of "analysys" to shift the public our way, now do we??????????

    Packers +2.5

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Sammy_Ace:

    Lol.  I finally got you to respond to a post.  Good luck and happy thanksgiving vue. You still didn't explain why you like the Pack?  What good is a pick if it doesn't come with an explanation?  Are we supposed to trust your nerdy database?  

    Despite all of the "In House" arguing in this thread (isn't it always us against the books???)

    I'm inclined to take the Packers and the points. Why, you ask???

    First off, where's their running game?? The one-two punch of Bradshaw and Jacobs has lost a lot of it's luster, since Jacobs left for the Niners, hasn't it?

    Secondly, I think Eli is missing his key receivers that left - with Hixon and Nicks dinged up pretty much all season, who does he have to rely on besides Victor Cruz? How great would it be to have a Manningham, or a Steve Smith, or when they had the chance at Plaxico Burress? Yes, Plaxico Burress.......

    Thirdly - Andy Dalton just picked this secondary apart - -  21/30, 200 yards and 4 TD's, no picks................... Andy Dalton.......... of the Bungles............... Andy...................... Dalton...............

     So, what do you think last year's MVP Aaron Rodgers will do to this secondary???????????

    See, we all don't need an encyclopedia's worth of "analysys" to shift the public our way, now do we??????????

    Packers +2.5

     
    radids
    radids
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2012
    Posts: 7
    Posted: Nov. 23, 2012 - 2:21 AM ET #22

    Well i must agree with VUE here i believe the Packs will win and cover in this game, still there is a fair chance for a great game that can change directions at any given point during the match, we need to acknowledge Packs vs Giants on the field it is indeed a tough one here. Anyways VUE one question, if you were to choose 8 lines for a parlay what will this lines be? Happy holidays all and GL for the weekend.
    Reply
    Well i must agree with VUE here i believe the Packs will win and cover in this game, still there is a fair chance for a great game that can change directions at any given point during the match, we need to acknowledge Packs vs Giants on the field it is indeed a tough one here. Anyways VUE one question, if you were to choose 8 lines for a parlay what will this lines be? Happy holidays all and GL for the weekend.
     
    mgmprofits
    mgmprofits
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2012
    Posts: 6659
    Posted: Nov. 23, 2012 - 4:00 AM ET #23

    This is not a hard game. It just took a minute to see through the illusion here. The winner of this game will be the Giants. As for them covering the spread though, I have no clue.
    Reply
    This is not a hard game. It just took a minute to see through the illusion here. The winner of this game will be the Giants. As for them covering the spread though, I have no clue.
     
    Sammy_Ace
    Sammy_Ace
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2012
    Posts: 296
    Posted: Nov. 23, 2012 - 8:40 AM ET #24

    Hey fellas, now that Dallas lost, I like the Giants even more. All the Giants were def watching yesterday and i know Dallas losing was a big shot to the arm. Take a look at the Gmen schedule coming up:

    At Washington
    New Orleans
    At Atlanta
    At Baltimore
    Philly

    The only easy game on that schedule is Philly and they lost to them earlier this year!! A win by the Giants here brings their record to 7-4 and puts them in the drivers seat in the East.  They could literally lose their next 3 and just beat Philly and that should be enough to win the division. The Packers are a great team and I've had my success backing them multiple times after that rough first 4 games of the year, but without Clay Matthews and Charles Woodson, I think they are going to really struggle to stop a well rested Giant team that matches up well on both sides of the ball. If and when those guys return, I will be back on that cheesehead bandwagon. And I don't think it's fair or smart to judge Eli based on how he's played the last 3 games. He's still putting together a solid year, and  I am really confident he will right his ship Sunday night.

    Reply
    Hey fellas, now that Dallas lost, I like the Giants even more. All the Giants were def watching yesterday and i know Dallas losing was a big shot to the arm. Take a look at the Gmen schedule coming up:

    At Washington
    New Orleans
    At Atlanta
    At Baltimore
    Philly

    The only easy game on that schedule is Philly and they lost to them earlier this year!! A win by the Giants here brings their record to 7-4 and puts them in the drivers seat in the East.  They could literally lose their next 3 and just beat Philly and that should be enough to win the division. The Packers are a great team and I've had my success backing them multiple times after that rough first 4 games of the year, but without Clay Matthews and Charles Woodson, I think they are going to really struggle to stop a well rested Giant team that matches up well on both sides of the ball. If and when those guys return, I will be back on that cheesehead bandwagon. And I don't think it's fair or smart to judge Eli based on how he's played the last 3 games. He's still putting together a solid year, and  I am really confident he will right his ship Sunday night.

     
     
    Tarynfor12
    Tarynfor12
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2012
    Posts: 195
    Posted: Nov. 23, 2012 - 1:25 PM ET #25

    This game means more for the G-Men then the Packers and keeping Jennings,CM3 out is a no brainer and having Woodson out is a blessing in disguise.Absolutely no reason for the Pack to chance these guys re-injuring themselves in this one when the games that will decide their position in the play-offs rests with the division games remaining.I expect to see a very vanilla offense..run,run,run even if they can't to keep Rodgers safe and the defense to simply soak up mentally what may come again later on.I'm a Packer fan and I'm all in on the G-men to get this one.

    Reply

    This game means more for the G-Men then the Packers and keeping Jennings,CM3 out is a no brainer and having Woodson out is a blessing in disguise.Absolutely no reason for the Pack to chance these guys re-injuring themselves in this one when the games that will decide their position in the play-offs rests with the division games remaining.I expect to see a very vanilla offense..run,run,run even if they can't to keep Rodgers safe and the defense to simply soak up mentally what may come again later on.I'm a Packer fan and I'm all in on the G-men to get this one.

    All Forums | Pro Football
    1234 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 462,855
    • Serious Streak Survivor Strategies 1,918,562
    • Monday 10/26/2026 774
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 286,098
    • PART DEUX 152
    • I’m on the Brewers to defeat the Rays in the World Series 3,256
    • BOYS/PHILLY live in game comments welcome 724
    • NFL THREAD * 151 * 29,526
    • Sac's Week 7 Plays 6,346
    • Lies, Inaccuracies & Stupidity 33,216

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
    Covers Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.