Nightridah,
In those road games, the Giants weren't favored by 9 either. They are 1-1 ats in two road games where they were favored by 8-10 points. the one win was against the Rams when they were team turmoil with a lame duck coach, and the other was last year in London against the Dolphins. It's easier to cover when getting instead of giving points. All that I am going to say is that the number is getting higher for the Giants, and this one is too high. It seems exploratory by the linesmakers. This is all I'm gonna say and then I will leave it alone. Cleveland hasn't been this big of a home dog since 2004.
Nightridah,
In those road games, the Giants weren't favored by 9 either. They are 1-1 ats in two road games where they were favored by 8-10 points. the one win was against the Rams when they were team turmoil with a lame duck coach, and the other was last year in London against the Dolphins. It's easier to cover when getting instead of giving points. All that I am going to say is that the number is getting higher for the Giants, and this one is too high. It seems exploratory by the linesmakers. This is all I'm gonna say and then I will leave it alone. Cleveland hasn't been this big of a home dog since 2004.
All Picks | 96-95-3 | 50.26% | -4250 | 10737 of 15182 |
drcomer I do give you credit for posting your picks and being confident in them but you don't have much cred when it comes to making money like you think you do.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. You got your stars back. Good weekend man.
And I do give analysis on the game. I participate, and I call my shots.
And, by the way, thanks for posting the stats, but everybody knows this is "Play" money. I'll post my money plays on other sites, and in my playbook. I do make money.
Well, good job getting you status back.
By the way, anytime you're up for a little competition let me know. I'm sure I can out-cap you.
All Picks | 96-95-3 | 50.26% | -4250 | 10737 of 15182 |
drcomer I do give you credit for posting your picks and being confident in them but you don't have much cred when it comes to making money like you think you do.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. You got your stars back. Good weekend man.
And I do give analysis on the game. I participate, and I call my shots.
And, by the way, thanks for posting the stats, but everybody knows this is "Play" money. I'll post my money plays on other sites, and in my playbook. I do make money.
Well, good job getting you status back.
By the way, anytime you're up for a little competition let me know. I'm sure I can out-cap you.
Nightridah,
In those road games, the Giants weren't favored by 9 either. They are 1-1 ats in two road games where they were favored by 8-10 points. the one win was against the Rams when they were team turmoil with a lame duck coach, and the other was last year in London against the Dolphins. It's easier to cover when getting instead of giving points. All that I am going to say is that the number is getting higher for the Giants, and this one is too high. It seems exploratory by the linesmakers. This is all I'm gonna say and then I will leave it alone. Cleveland hasn't been this big of a home dog since 2004.
With all do respect, Watch, you were spouting the same type of questions on the Seattle game. When someone would state trends and past results, you would reply, "when did they beat Seattle by 7? when did they cover 7?" How did that turn out for you? The line is the line. And yes they very from game to game...we all know that. But trends are trends. NYG are 3-1 ats...no the spreads weren't -8 or 9, but they are that good and the oddsmakers have to adjust. Everyone that keeps doubting this team...keep doubting them. Otherwise, i would have to give up like 13 in this game.
Nightridah,
In those road games, the Giants weren't favored by 9 either. They are 1-1 ats in two road games where they were favored by 8-10 points. the one win was against the Rams when they were team turmoil with a lame duck coach, and the other was last year in London against the Dolphins. It's easier to cover when getting instead of giving points. All that I am going to say is that the number is getting higher for the Giants, and this one is too high. It seems exploratory by the linesmakers. This is all I'm gonna say and then I will leave it alone. Cleveland hasn't been this big of a home dog since 2004.
With all do respect, Watch, you were spouting the same type of questions on the Seattle game. When someone would state trends and past results, you would reply, "when did they beat Seattle by 7? when did they cover 7?" How did that turn out for you? The line is the line. And yes they very from game to game...we all know that. But trends are trends. NYG are 3-1 ats...no the spreads weren't -8 or 9, but they are that good and the oddsmakers have to adjust. Everyone that keeps doubting this team...keep doubting them. Otherwise, i would have to give up like 13 in this game.
Flava Flav is a clown. Period. Rapping about social issues, please, go listen to some Zappa if you want to hear art and creativity tied into social issues. Rap is for kids, and look at hopw much damage rap has caused, thats for another forum. When you bet at least 4 units per game its easy to win 7. Thanks for the math lesson though! GL tonight, hope you end the week on an up note.
Flava Flav is taking advantage of the system that presented itsself. And rapped about social issues. Rap caused damage? I suppose that rap is what caused the economy to be the way it is? Look how much damage politics and big business and shady real estate loans and lenders that won't lend because it is impossible to cover margins with all that is going on. Cars sit on lots. Can't afford one unless you wager or rap nowadays.
For whatever rap may have caused that was bad, it never efffected your pockets if you never chose to buy it. Rap was always a choice. Rap music didn't make it so that you ain't got no choice but to buy 4.00 gas and lose money on your stocks and 401K. I'd rather listen to Flava Flav than have my next door neighbor lose their house to forclosure and sever the ties they have with my children. Anyway what is Zappa, and what does he know about anyone's situation that he didn't have to study to know? I'm not into wine and cheese music. I like whiskey and Chuck Taylors.
Flava Flav is a clown. Period. Rapping about social issues, please, go listen to some Zappa if you want to hear art and creativity tied into social issues. Rap is for kids, and look at hopw much damage rap has caused, thats for another forum. When you bet at least 4 units per game its easy to win 7. Thanks for the math lesson though! GL tonight, hope you end the week on an up note.
Flava Flav is taking advantage of the system that presented itsself. And rapped about social issues. Rap caused damage? I suppose that rap is what caused the economy to be the way it is? Look how much damage politics and big business and shady real estate loans and lenders that won't lend because it is impossible to cover margins with all that is going on. Cars sit on lots. Can't afford one unless you wager or rap nowadays.
For whatever rap may have caused that was bad, it never efffected your pockets if you never chose to buy it. Rap was always a choice. Rap music didn't make it so that you ain't got no choice but to buy 4.00 gas and lose money on your stocks and 401K. I'd rather listen to Flava Flav than have my next door neighbor lose their house to forclosure and sever the ties they have with my children. Anyway what is Zappa, and what does he know about anyone's situation that he didn't have to study to know? I'm not into wine and cheese music. I like whiskey and Chuck Taylors.
By design,
the Seattle game was a different situation. The road team was Seattle. The home team is the Browns, and thusly you can't compare the two. Nor can you only point to the Seattle game and ask "how'd that one work for me when my record isn't 100%, and neither is yours. All that I know is that the line went down to 8 on most books now. I got my at 9 this morning, so I know that there's reverse movement going on. I expected to be the minority on this game, and I'm sticking to my guns
By design,
the Seattle game was a different situation. The road team was Seattle. The home team is the Browns, and thusly you can't compare the two. Nor can you only point to the Seattle game and ask "how'd that one work for me when my record isn't 100%, and neither is yours. All that I know is that the line went down to 8 on most books now. I got my at 9 this morning, so I know that there's reverse movement going on. I expected to be the minority on this game, and I'm sticking to my guns
NYG CLE |
31.8 11.5 |
431.0 210.8 |
249.8 123.0 |
181.2 87.8 |
5.8 3.6 |
7.5 4.2 |
Def | Avg | Yards | Pass | Rush | Y/R | Y/A |
NYG CLE |
12.2 19.5 |
236.0 313.0 |
154.0 187.0 |
82.0 126.0 |
3.7 4.1 |
4.9 7.1 |
This tells me all i need to know. NYG- 8 is the play for me also looking at the first half.
NYG CLE |
31.8 11.5 |
431.0 210.8 |
249.8 123.0 |
181.2 87.8 |
5.8 3.6 |
7.5 4.2 |
Def | Avg | Yards | Pass | Rush | Y/R | Y/A |
NYG CLE |
12.2 19.5 |
236.0 313.0 |
154.0 187.0 |
82.0 126.0 |
3.7 4.1 |
4.9 7.1 |
This tells me all i need to know. NYG- 8 is the play for me also looking at the first half.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New poster, been reading for years though. The Giants on the ML seems like a virtual lock to me. Someone play devil's advocate who isn't a (rather unrealistic) Browns homer...there's a lot more financial risk involved in a moneyline wager if you want it to pay...this is the only game I am touching as I am new to the west coast and didn't realize the Sox were playing already :( would've liked the 2 team ML parlay.
Thoughts? Sorry, I wish I had some valuable insight...just looking for some! MBV
New poster, been reading for years though. The Giants on the ML seems like a virtual lock to me. Someone play devil's advocate who isn't a (rather unrealistic) Browns homer...there's a lot more financial risk involved in a moneyline wager if you want it to pay...this is the only game I am touching as I am new to the west coast and didn't realize the Sox were playing already :( would've liked the 2 team ML parlay.
Thoughts? Sorry, I wish I had some valuable insight...just looking for some! MBV
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.