Judging by my man, cryptonite we call him............... he loves Gmen and stands to collect 10g. The last time he won there was no such thing as football. Sorry Eli and co. the fickled finger of fate has been pointed directly at you. If I had to make a play....
PATRIOTS ML.
Judging by my man, cryptonite we call him............... he loves Gmen and stands to collect 10g. The last time he won there was no such thing as football. Sorry Eli and co. the fickled finger of fate has been pointed directly at you. If I had to make a play....
PATRIOTS ML.
My first post on page one contains facts pertained to most games, but one thing has just dawned on me was that on every supper bowl games the early public favorite usually won because big money came pouring in @ the final minutes.
GLTA
My first post on page one contains facts pertained to most games, but one thing has just dawned on me was that on every supper bowl games the early public favorite usually won because big money came pouring in @ the final minutes.
GLTA
Don't forget the Giants lost to Washington twice (Very crappy team) and to the Seahawks at home as a huge favorite. They also lost to Philly and San Fran. I was liking the Giants when I first saw this line but the Giant love is getting out of hand. Vegas and the public has been backing the Giants for weeks but they still have a line of Giants getting 3. Something smells fishy on this line. If the Giant love keeps pouring in I am gonna have to take the PATS LARGEEEEE. Gotta see injury report on Gronkowski first though.
Don't forget the Giants lost to Washington twice (Very crappy team) and to the Seahawks at home as a huge favorite. They also lost to Philly and San Fran. I was liking the Giants when I first saw this line but the Giant love is getting out of hand. Vegas and the public has been backing the Giants for weeks but they still have a line of Giants getting 3. Something smells fishy on this line. If the Giant love keeps pouring in I am gonna have to take the PATS LARGEEEEE. Gotta see injury report on Gronkowski first though.
Easy,
They also got absolutely waxed in New Orleans and the NFC Least (Eagles fan here) was not a great division. Hell wasn't even a good division this year. Also, got to take into consideration that the Pats have never lost to the same team twice in one year. Also, take into consideration that the GMen were playing big public underdog in Super Bowl 42 and look how that turned out. Also, (not enough pick evidence yet) almost everytime the expert predictions on wagerline is 90% or greater on one side it almost always loses. All I am saying is tread carefully.
Easy,
They also got absolutely waxed in New Orleans and the NFC Least (Eagles fan here) was not a great division. Hell wasn't even a good division this year. Also, got to take into consideration that the Pats have never lost to the same team twice in one year. Also, take into consideration that the GMen were playing big public underdog in Super Bowl 42 and look how that turned out. Also, (not enough pick evidence yet) almost everytime the expert predictions on wagerline is 90% or greater on one side it almost always loses. All I am saying is tread carefully.
Counter-Point: The 49ers clearly put more pressure on Eli then the GMen did on Alex Smith. The better WB and team that made fewer mistakes won. Look at the stats. Eli threw the ball 60 times and was sacked a few times and knocked down over 20 times. He was pressured 33% of the time.
To your point: The Patriots struggle to get a pass rush on opposing QB's and that is a serious liability vs Eli Manning as he goes through his receiver progressions very well. This could be trouble for a thin, underwhelming secondary such as the Patriots.
As of today I would take the Gmen and the under but that depends on Gronkowski's status for the super bowl (looked like pollard rolled his ankle pretty good on the various replays) and the publics perception of the game come Super Bowl Sunday. Thinkink I will fade the public which will definitely be leaning the over (thus the under pick) and will fade whatever side the majority is leaning towards. GLTA
Counter-Point: The 49ers clearly put more pressure on Eli then the GMen did on Alex Smith. The better WB and team that made fewer mistakes won. Look at the stats. Eli threw the ball 60 times and was sacked a few times and knocked down over 20 times. He was pressured 33% of the time.
To your point: The Patriots struggle to get a pass rush on opposing QB's and that is a serious liability vs Eli Manning as he goes through his receiver progressions very well. This could be trouble for a thin, underwhelming secondary such as the Patriots.
As of today I would take the Gmen and the under but that depends on Gronkowski's status for the super bowl (looked like pollard rolled his ankle pretty good on the various replays) and the publics perception of the game come Super Bowl Sunday. Thinkink I will fade the public which will definitely be leaning the over (thus the under pick) and will fade whatever side the majority is leaning towards. GLTA
Don't forget the Giants lost to Washington twice (Very crappy team) and to the Seahawks at home as a huge favorite. They also lost to Philly and San Fran. I was liking the Giants when I first saw this line but the Giant love is getting out of hand. Vegas and the public has been backing the Giants for weeks but they still have a line of Giants getting 3. Something smells fishy on this line. If the Giant love keeps pouring in I am gonna have to take the PATS LARGEEEEE. Gotta see injury report on Gronkowski first though.
Don't forget the Giants lost to Washington twice (Very crappy team) and to the Seahawks at home as a huge favorite. They also lost to Philly and San Fran. I was liking the Giants when I first saw this line but the Giant love is getting out of hand. Vegas and the public has been backing the Giants for weeks but they still have a line of Giants getting 3. Something smells fishy on this line. If the Giant love keeps pouring in I am gonna have to take the PATS LARGEEEEE. Gotta see injury report on Gronkowski first though.
Easy,
They also got absolutely waxed in New Orleans and the NFC Least (Eagles fan here) was not a great division. Hell wasn't even a good division this year. Also, got to take into consideration that the Pats have never lost to the same team twice in one year. Also, take into consideration that the GMen were playing big public underdog in Super Bowl 42 and look how that turned out. Also, (not enough pick evidence yet) almost everytime the expert predictions on wagerline is 90% or greater on one side it almost always loses. All I am saying is tread carefully.
Easy,
They also got absolutely waxed in New Orleans and the NFC Least (Eagles fan here) was not a great division. Hell wasn't even a good division this year. Also, got to take into consideration that the Pats have never lost to the same team twice in one year. Also, take into consideration that the GMen were playing big public underdog in Super Bowl 42 and look how that turned out. Also, (not enough pick evidence yet) almost everytime the expert predictions on wagerline is 90% or greater on one side it almost always loses. All I am saying is tread carefully.
Easy,
They also got absolutely waxed in New Orleans and the NFC Least (Eagles fan here) was not a great division. Hell wasn't even a good division this year. Also, got to take into consideration that the Pats have never lost to the same team twice in one year. Also, take into consideration that the GMen were playing big public underdog in Super Bowl 42 and look how that turned out. Also, (not enough pick evidence yet) almost everytime the expert predictions on wagerline is 90% or greater on one side it almost always loses. All I am saying is tread carefully.
Easy,
They also got absolutely waxed in New Orleans and the NFC Least (Eagles fan here) was not a great division. Hell wasn't even a good division this year. Also, got to take into consideration that the Pats have never lost to the same team twice in one year. Also, take into consideration that the GMen were playing big public underdog in Super Bowl 42 and look how that turned out. Also, (not enough pick evidence yet) almost everytime the expert predictions on wagerline is 90% or greater on one side it almost always loses. All I am saying is tread carefully.
First off - let's just recap:
Baltimore = sure handed Lee Evans drops the game winner, and then Billy Cundiff misses a chip shot that would of at least meant O.T......
San Francisco = a rookie returner muffs not one but 2 punts! One goes for the go ahead TD, while the other is the game winner in O,T.!!!
In my opinion, due to a dropped pass and a couple of special teams mistakes the 2 best teams are not playing in the Superbowl this year - but am I bitter? Nahh..........
First off - let's just recap:
Baltimore = sure handed Lee Evans drops the game winner, and then Billy Cundiff misses a chip shot that would of at least meant O.T......
San Francisco = a rookie returner muffs not one but 2 punts! One goes for the go ahead TD, while the other is the game winner in O,T.!!!
In my opinion, due to a dropped pass and a couple of special teams mistakes the 2 best teams are not playing in the Superbowl this year - but am I bitter? Nahh..........
It's been four years and both teams' rosters have changed significantly, but the fundamental philosophies of each organization remain unchanged. The Giants balanced offense can hang with New England if by chance it becomes a shootout. The more likely scenario is the Giants winning a low-scoring game led by their Defensive Line. The NE passing game is all about protection and timing. The Giants never-ending wave of QB-attacking defensive lineman will rattle Brady the entire game and Eli will do what needs to be done to get the win. For what it's worth, I'm not a fan of either team. Just callin' what I see.
Giants ML LARGE!
Under 1st half 27.5 LARGE!
Under 55 LARGE!
Giants ML and Under 55 Parlay.
I know it's easy to say four years after the fact, but I was all over the Giants ML and the under then, and I like both plays even better this year!
GLTA
It's been four years and both teams' rosters have changed significantly, but the fundamental philosophies of each organization remain unchanged. The Giants balanced offense can hang with New England if by chance it becomes a shootout. The more likely scenario is the Giants winning a low-scoring game led by their Defensive Line. The NE passing game is all about protection and timing. The Giants never-ending wave of QB-attacking defensive lineman will rattle Brady the entire game and Eli will do what needs to be done to get the win. For what it's worth, I'm not a fan of either team. Just callin' what I see.
Giants ML LARGE!
Under 1st half 27.5 LARGE!
Under 55 LARGE!
Giants ML and Under 55 Parlay.
I know it's easy to say four years after the fact, but I was all over the Giants ML and the under then, and I like both plays even better this year!
GLTA
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.