Whale Fucker and Gaynard:
I wasn't bashing anyone first off. If you actually read my posts I was only giving counter opinions to your childish points. You never stated super bowl wins so i took it as playoff wins. Your childish anecdotes after it make you seem like the asshole you are. Second off you are clearly a Giants homer. I must have missed the asswhoopin the Gmen gave the 49ers last week. Did not know they won 56-0. Enjoy being internet tough guys you fucking pussies.
Agian this Bitch is D.U.M.B. !!!!!
She says she's not bashing anyone and giving counter points to our childish opinions?????????????
HER FACTS ARE WRONG NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT PLAYOFF WINS !!!!!!!!!!
Childish anecdotes????
She's the first person to insult.......then she continues above...........while still insulting and talking ish?????
Your ignorant and it is very clear, please don't respond!!!!!!!
GLTA!
-Whale
It is hard to believe that G-Men are getting 3 points. You don't even see it going down to 2 or 2.5. - ??
NE only played two winning teams all year and lost them both. Gronk is hurt and with it being a high ankle sprain how effective will he be? O CHO going to be the savior? I don't think so. The money is going to the G-Men
Can anyone make any sense of this?
It's the Superbowl, let amateur hour begin. Reading some these lame, inaccurate posts makes me laugh. How have the Giants been getting all the calls? Do you really think Brady is going to put up 37 points?
The Giants should win this game. Their defense will be able to make more stops. With that said, that's why they play the game. Not buying into the questions around the line. The Giants matchup well against the Pats.
The play is Giants +3 and ML.
... So.. I'm seeing 54.5 is just too much for any bowl game.. and the fact that Giants has better defense and get -3.. and being a big teaser.. I will tease Giants/Under
As a las vegas resident, and a fan of the lowly rams, i'll offer a few thoughts on this game - as an impartial observer! The current line is new england -2.5 and the total is 54.
The patriots have the worst defense, statistically, of any superbowl representative. The giants overall defensive #s aren't that great, but they've had significant injuries. They defeated the pats on the road, now they are a 'dog on a neutral field? Something doesn't add up!!! I haven't really seen any patriot posts on here that provide ample reasoning for a new england victory. The giants are now healthy, have been winning on the road...should be able to get pressure on brady, and should be able to put up 30+ points this sunday. I'm taking the Gmen ML and the over (down to 54, will most likely go back up since the public loves betting the over). Additionally, gronkowski will not be at full strength...could even aggravate the injury during the game forcing him to the bench...the only thing that worries me is that it seems like "everyone" is on the Giants in this. However, as my buddy says, sometimes "it's just that obvious." Can someone give me a reason to bet the patriots other than "it's tom brady and the hoodie is coaching." ???????? Thanks!
... So.. I'm seeing 54.5 is just too much for any bowl game.. and the fact that Giants has better defense and get -3.. and being a big teaser.. I will tease Giants/Under This will be my biggest bet...
The Back Eye Peas - ?????
Oil is black - ?????
Madonna wore a silver cone bra - ????
Tom Brady is wearing green socks - ?????
I'm laughing and crying at the same time.
As a las vegas resident, and a fan of the lowly rams, i'll offer a few thoughts on this game - as an impartial observer! The current line is new england -2.5 and the total is 54.
The patriots have the worst defense, statistically, of any superbowl representative. The giants overall defensive #s aren't that great, but they've had significant injuries. They defeated the pats on the road, now they are a 'dog on a neutral field? Something doesn't add up!!! I haven't really seen any patriot posts on here that provide ample reasoning for a new england victory. The giants are now healthy, have been winning on the road...should be able to get pressure on brady, and should be able to put up 30+ points this sunday. I'm taking the Gmen ML and the over (down to 54, will most likely go back up since the public loves betting the over). Additionally, gronkowski will not be at full strength...could even aggravate the injury during the game forcing him to the bench...the only thing that worries me is that it seems like "everyone" is on the Giants in this. However, as my buddy says, sometimes "it's just that obvious." Can someone give me a reason to bet the patriots other than "it's tom brady and the hoodie is coaching." ???????? Thanks!
The above make sense to me. But nobody is talking about Special Teams and I believe the Patriots may have an advantage in the special teams. Actualy were not this years Conference Championship games decided by Special Teams?
Even at 54 I am taking the under.
Good luck to All
i still stand by the post that the pats D can't be that bad if they made the Superbowl. based on what ur saying I'm doubting the credentials of the "vegas" people that you allegedly know. in regards to so called bad defenses....... look at the 06 Indy Colts. They were ranked DEAD LAST in run defense that year and supposedly there was NO WAY u can win a superbowl with the last ranked run D. and what happened?!?!?!? yeah, at the end of the reg season everyone and their mom ran roughshod on the colts D and caused a few losses.....but then again something...changed. The D became STOUT in the playoffs and eventually beat so called conventional "wisdom" and won the who thing with the worst ranked run D in the entire nfl. flash forward to...now. The giants D wasn't so hot themselves. They weren't ranked too highly themselves. let's see...
FACT ...the giants d was ranked 27 in the entire nfl for the 2011 reg season. So....the 31 ranked defense faces the 27th ranked D in the superbowl. hmm...... with the way you tell it you would think the giants would at least have a TOP TEN Defense instead of a D that wasn't even in the top 25 on paper. But ....let's look at another stat since u allegedly know how to cap games based on "facts." where did new england stand on PPG defense. hmm...what the purpose of a Defense? to keep the other team from scoring points is a simple way of looking at at. Let's see......the giants are ranked # 25! in ppg defense while NE is ranked 15. Hmm...Ne is almost a top ten ppg defense
not just for the playoffs...but for the 2011 regular season. not to mention....New England is ranked 2nd in the entire nfl out of 32 teams in INTERCEPTIONS. something to think about. based on FACTS regarding 2011 reg season statistics. I would think a lil harder basing my bets on a so called bad New england Defense. Again....there is a REASON why new england is in the superbowl.
BTW......for the 2007 regular season New England had the 4th ranked DEFENSE and led the nfl with a record in ppg scored for the reg season. The giants were ranked a lower 7th. We all know how that turned out............
these are really nice stats you have come up with here.. now being ranked 31st in the league in defense when you absolutely played nobody all year and being ranked 27th when you played the harder opposition all year makes a big difference here i mean its only my opinion oh and same goes for the PPG defense....
The Patriots didn't beat a single team with a winning record in the regular season, New England, whose lone win this season against an above .500 team came last week against the Ravens.
The Giants have had success attacking the quarterback with 4 or fewer pass rushers this postseason, and it continued with 3 sacks of Alex Smith. Tom Brady only took 1 sack against the Ravens' standard pressure, but had one of his worst games of the year against 4 or fewer rushers.
The last sixteen favorites to score 30 or less points are 2-14-1 ATS, an interesting stat considering that Tom Coughlin’s teams have surrendered more than 28 points in only three of 15 postseason games while Bill Belichick’s troops have tallied more than 28 points in just six of 24 playoff contests.
The 2012 Super Bowl will be the first in which quarterbacks who each have a Super Bowl MVP award will play against one another. New England's Tom Brady is one of only four players to win it multiple times, with Joe Montana (three times) Terry Bradshaw and Bart Starr.
- This will be the third quarterback rematch in Super Bowl history. You will like the way the other two turned out, which is shown below:
The Giants (9-7) - who defeated Atlanta (10-6), Green Bay (15-1) and San Francisco (13-3) - are only the second team to reach the Super Bowl via playoff victories over three opponents with a better regular-season record than its own (Arizona, 2008).
Since '07, Brady has posted a 4-3 record in the postseason while tossing 16 touchdowns compared to 10 interceptions and recording a 90.0 quarterback rating. Don't get me wrong, those stats are far from awful but they are nowhere near Manning's.
Manning has a 7-1 record while throwing 14 touchdowns and only four interceptions and posting a 93.2 quarterback rating.
The quarterback ratings may be close, but the record is rather alarming and so is the interception total. Another interesting stat that is extremely lopsided in Manning's favor is that he has thrown 14 passes greater than 25 yards while Brady has only six.
Since '07, it's safe to label Manning as the better postseason quarterback than Brady—stats simply don't lie.
interesting stuff right????
The Patriots didn't beat a single team with a winning record in the regular season, New England, whose lone win this season against an above .500 team came last week against the Ravens.
The Giants have had success attacking the quarterback with 4 or fewer pass rushers this postseason, and it continued with 3 sacks of Alex Smith. Tom Brady only took 1 sack against the Ravens' standard pressure, but had one of his worst games of the year against 4 or fewer rushers.
The last sixteen favorites to score 30 or less points are 2-14-1 ATS, an interesting stat considering that Tom Coughlin’s teams have surrendered more than 28 points in only three of 15 postseason games while Bill Belichick’s troops have tallied more than 28 points in just six of 24 playoff contests.
The 2012 Super Bowl will be the first in which quarterbacks who each have a Super Bowl MVP award will play against one another. New England's Tom Brady is one of only four players to win it multiple times, with Joe Montana (three times) Terry Bradshaw and Bart Starr.
The Giants (9-7) - who defeated Atlanta (10-6), Green Bay (15-1) and San Francisco (13-3) - are only the second team to reach the Super Bowl via playoff victories over three opponents with a better regular-season record than its own (Arizona, 2008).
Since '07, Brady has posted a 4-3 record in the postseason while tossing 16 touchdowns compared to 10 interceptions and recording a 90.0 quarterback rating. Don't get me wrong, those stats are far from awful but they are nowhere near Manning's.
Manning has a 7-1 record while throwing 14 touchdowns and only four interceptions and posting a 93.2 quarterback rating.
The quarterback ratings may be close, but the record is rather alarming and so is the interception total. Another interesting stat that is extremely lopsided in Manning's favor is that he has thrown 14 passes greater than 25 yards while Brady has only six.
Since '07, it's safe to label Manning as the better postseason quarterback than Brady—stats simply don't lie.
- This will be the third quarterback rematch in Super Bowl history. You will like the way the other two turned out, which is shown below:
terry bradshaw pitt vs roger staubach dallas superbowls X and XIII which bradshaw won both...troy aikman dallas vs jim kelly buffalo superbowls XXVII and XXVIII which aikman won both.... eli manning giants vs tom brady patriots superbowls XLII and XLVI we know eli won the 1st one?????????
Established in 1995,
ne secondary is young & talented, but ima give to the salsa trio to have the advantage here! and more weapons for ELI-TE to fire off at...bola ! 
Hot Forum Topics
