Having trouble betting this shitfest. Might just bet the NCAA game. BOL.
Van. History says NE can't cover You right But that was with Eli and a healthy offensive unit. This is a rookie QB with all his skills players sitting out. Kinda different in this case
Van. History says NE can't cover You right But that was with Eli and a healthy offensive unit. This is a rookie QB with all his skills players sitting out. Kinda different in this case
Look at the prop bets. Daniel Jones has a prop bet of 1 passing td -120$ for the under. Vegas has a little faith in Daniel Jones even getting 1 td. Some books have it as low as 0.5 td. That basically saying, slim chance Daniel Jones will even get a td.
Look at the prop bets. Daniel Jones has a prop bet of 1 passing td -120$ for the under. Vegas has a little faith in Daniel Jones even getting 1 td. Some books have it as low as 0.5 td. That basically saying, slim chance Daniel Jones will even get a td.
"Since 2003, the Patriots are 156-97-8 against the spread in the regular season, good for an A-graded 21.0% return on investment. They’re even better when playing outside of the division with a 100-58-4 ATS record (24.4% ROI). They present a significant challenge to teams that are unfamiliar with them.
Against teams that failed to make the playoffs in the previous season, they are 109-58-5 ATS (27.5% ROI). Under head coach Bill Belichick, the Pats are the type of team that historically has outperformed expectations against poor teams.
And what about when they have played non-divisional non-playoff teams? They have a 61-25-1 ATS record (39.1% ROI)."
That from an expert I was reading. A little statistics for people who like numbers
"Since 2003, the Patriots are 156-97-8 against the spread in the regular season, good for an A-graded 21.0% return on investment. They’re even better when playing outside of the division with a 100-58-4 ATS record (24.4% ROI). They present a significant challenge to teams that are unfamiliar with them.
Against teams that failed to make the playoffs in the previous season, they are 109-58-5 ATS (27.5% ROI). Under head coach Bill Belichick, the Pats are the type of team that historically has outperformed expectations against poor teams.
And what about when they have played non-divisional non-playoff teams? They have a 61-25-1 ATS record (39.1% ROI)."
That from an expert I was reading. A little statistics for people who like numbers
NE + under. I won't over think this unless God puts his hand in this game We all know Everything is leading to NE and under. Only way it goes over if gaints D somehow scores for them. Sharp money also sided with NE. So far there hasn't been any sharp money on gaints. Even at this high of a number. Sharps put more money on the under. 22% and the real money on the under is higher then the over (which the public is on the over). I believe the sharps are done with the spread because - 16.5 is the true value of the game. I only mention sharps cause they are the only ones that will move the line due to their big bets. I say wait till close to kick off and play. Maybe some sharps are waiting to see if this line will go higher before backing gaints. If no buy back for gaints by kick off. NE will be a solid play.
NE + under. I won't over think this unless God puts his hand in this game We all know Everything is leading to NE and under. Only way it goes over if gaints D somehow scores for them. Sharp money also sided with NE. So far there hasn't been any sharp money on gaints. Even at this high of a number. Sharps put more money on the under. 22% and the real money on the under is higher then the over (which the public is on the over). I believe the sharps are done with the spread because - 16.5 is the true value of the game. I only mention sharps cause they are the only ones that will move the line due to their big bets. I say wait till close to kick off and play. Maybe some sharps are waiting to see if this line will go higher before backing gaints. If no buy back for gaints by kick off. NE will be a solid play.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.