Philadelphia +112 money line verses the Rodgerless Packers. Nick Foles has thrown 13 TD's and 0 interceptions. He has lead Philadelphia to 3 wins and 1 loss in his 4 starts. He has been very good in three starts and lousy in his fourth. Green Bay has Seneca Wallace starting and he has to be better than he was against Chicago with a week of practice with the first string. Green Bay looks screwed until Rodgers comes back, Philadelphia looks like they have found the right QB for the Chip Kelly run offense. Taking Philly +112 ml. You can take them at +1 point spread if you want.
0
Philadelphia +112 money line verses the Rodgerless Packers. Nick Foles has thrown 13 TD's and 0 interceptions. He has lead Philadelphia to 3 wins and 1 loss in his 4 starts. He has been very good in three starts and lousy in his fourth. Green Bay has Seneca Wallace starting and he has to be better than he was against Chicago with a week of practice with the first string. Green Bay looks screwed until Rodgers comes back, Philadelphia looks like they have found the right QB for the Chip Kelly run offense. Taking Philly +112 ml. You can take them at +1 point spread if you want.
next man up..cant forget when we went to new england and covered double digits in 2010 with matt flynn, the prior week he looked worse than wallace in relief.pack didnt score td in detroit. big mac has always been regarded as one of the better qb coaches in lge. foles hit lightning in a bottle last sun..hayden was a reach at cb u think? par for the course with raiders. i expect a desperate inspired packers team to gut out a win. What a great spot for pack we lose are franchise qb while foles punches his ticket in record book. typical overreaction in betting market
0
next man up..cant forget when we went to new england and covered double digits in 2010 with matt flynn, the prior week he looked worse than wallace in relief.pack didnt score td in detroit. big mac has always been regarded as one of the better qb coaches in lge. foles hit lightning in a bottle last sun..hayden was a reach at cb u think? par for the course with raiders. i expect a desperate inspired packers team to gut out a win. What a great spot for pack we lose are franchise qb while foles punches his ticket in record book. typical overreaction in betting market
1)Green Bay is still favored. That is not in my opinion an over reaction in betting market.
2) Foles going nuts in one game isn't what I looked at. Playing very well and leading his team to victory 3 out of the last 4 games, that to me is worth noting and betting on.
3) For every replacement level QB that plays like Flynn did there are 5 who play like Seneca Wallace did. I bet percentages and the percentages say the replacement level QB put on the field by Green Bay is going to be lousy, QB coaches can't work miracles.
4) I am a believer that Chip Kelly the Philadelphia coach can direct an NFL team to put up really good scoring numbers IF he has the personal to do it. Can the Packers with Rodgers keep up? yes. With this new guy Seneca Wallace? Probably not.
0
respectfully disagree babygus, here is why.
1)Green Bay is still favored. That is not in my opinion an over reaction in betting market.
2) Foles going nuts in one game isn't what I looked at. Playing very well and leading his team to victory 3 out of the last 4 games, that to me is worth noting and betting on.
3) For every replacement level QB that plays like Flynn did there are 5 who play like Seneca Wallace did. I bet percentages and the percentages say the replacement level QB put on the field by Green Bay is going to be lousy, QB coaches can't work miracles.
4) I am a believer that Chip Kelly the Philadelphia coach can direct an NFL team to put up really good scoring numbers IF he has the personal to do it. Can the Packers with Rodgers keep up? yes. With this new guy Seneca Wallace? Probably not.
we will pound the ball, expect the game to shrink. this will be back 2 back road games for philly which is never good. well see just know when backups are in betting markets overeact..look at monday +10 bears after rodgers tore up vikings d on sunday night football. same spot
0
we will pound the ball, expect the game to shrink. this will be back 2 back road games for philly which is never good. well see just know when backups are in betting markets overeact..look at monday +10 bears after rodgers tore up vikings d on sunday night football. same spot
At just one point, this is a tease game for me. Yes, Foles is slingin' it around, but who has he really played a full game against? The Giants, Bucs, and the Raiders? Child, please.
You want a good example of how I think this game will play out? Take the Bengals a few weeks ago. They destroy the Jets 49-9, and then lose to the Dolphins in O.T. I think this same thing could happen here, even with Rodgers out. Now, do they win by a FG, or lose by a FG? Don't know, don't care.....
Good Luck All!
0
At just one point, this is a tease game for me. Yes, Foles is slingin' it around, but who has he really played a full game against? The Giants, Bucs, and the Raiders? Child, please.
You want a good example of how I think this game will play out? Take the Bengals a few weeks ago. They destroy the Jets 49-9, and then lose to the Dolphins in O.T. I think this same thing could happen here, even with Rodgers out. Now, do they win by a FG, or lose by a FG? Don't know, don't care.....
Hard to imagine GB losing at home back to back....
I also imagine Rodgers getting the D pumped up to make up for him being out....... Rodgers is worth 7-10 pts, even with him out, this line should be GB -2.5
0
Hard to imagine GB losing at home back to back....
I also imagine Rodgers getting the D pumped up to make up for him being out....... Rodgers is worth 7-10 pts, even with him out, this line should be GB -2.5
The lost of Rodgers and its impact on the offense needs not be talked about....the impact it has on the defense is the question,
Whether Matthews, Perry or whoever else worth mentioning is able to play, the only chance they have is to keep the score low so the weakened offense via the pass doesn't become the made focus to win the game. They need to keep it within striking distance for the use of the run to make possible a pass strike to a Nelson, Boykin or Jones easier and for hopefully a TD or a setup to obtain one. These chances may not come often but when they do,it must be successful.....GB-20-17
0
The lost of Rodgers and its impact on the offense needs not be talked about....the impact it has on the defense is the question,
Whether Matthews, Perry or whoever else worth mentioning is able to play, the only chance they have is to keep the score low so the weakened offense via the pass doesn't become the made focus to win the game. They need to keep it within striking distance for the use of the run to make possible a pass strike to a Nelson, Boykin or Jones easier and for hopefully a TD or a setup to obtain one. These chances may not come often but when they do,it must be successful.....GB-20-17
The eagles are undefeated on the road some reason they come to play in other city's then there on well in all not touching this game cause GB. Will be ready for a fight an the QB going to have to step it up cause of injuries only reason I like the unders is clay is back an he's one of the best in the business so Un. The total.
0
The eagles are undefeated on the road some reason they come to play in other city's then there on well in all not touching this game cause GB. Will be ready for a fight an the QB going to have to step it up cause of injuries only reason I like the unders is clay is back an he's one of the best in the business so Un. The total.
mis numeros me indican q deveria de ganar facilmente green bay y se da la alta espero no equivocarme con esta prediccion soy nuevo en este medio y no se mucho de este juego pero hay le voy poco a poco solo estudio los numeron mas no los jugadores
0
mis numeros me indican q deveria de ganar facilmente green bay y se da la alta espero no equivocarme con esta prediccion soy nuevo en este medio y no se mucho de este juego pero hay le voy poco a poco solo estudio los numeron mas no los jugadores
come on man. The Pack is not JUST Aaron Rodgers. they are a team! Seneca Wallace can do the job , he's not a rookie . They still have Lacy to power run the ball. They got Jordy Nelson , they got Jarret Boykin too , they got James Jones they got Starks. I wont deny the Eagles looked impressive last week, but the pack have a better D then Raiders
Pack -1 (in a close one)
0
come on man. The Pack is not JUST Aaron Rodgers. they are a team! Seneca Wallace can do the job , he's not a rookie . They still have Lacy to power run the ball. They got Jordy Nelson , they got Jarret Boykin too , they got James Jones they got Starks. I wont deny the Eagles looked impressive last week, but the pack have a better D then Raiders
I don't think we got a chance without Rogers and Eagles is good road team if you bet with your heart pick packers if you bet with your wallet pick eagles
0
I don't think we got a chance without Rogers and Eagles is good road team if you bet with your heart pick packers if you bet with your wallet pick eagles
mis numeros me indican q deveria de ganar facilmente green bay y se da la alta espero no equivocarme con esta prediccion soy nuevo en este medio y no se mucho de este juego pero hay le voy poco a poco solo estudio los numeron mas no los jugadores
We are in America darn FACE
0
Quote Originally Posted by vampiro666:
mis numeros me indican q deveria de ganar facilmente green bay y se da la alta espero no equivocarme con esta prediccion soy nuevo en este medio y no se mucho de este juego pero hay le voy poco a poco solo estudio los numeron mas no los jugadores
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.