All Forums | Pro Football

San Diego at Kansas City (09/30/2012)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 4134
Posts: 27
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2002
Posts: 61
Posted: #1

Away:  San Diego [2-1 ATS]
Home:  Kansas City [1-2 ATS]

Game Time: 1:00 PM
Stadium: Arrowhead Stadium

Recent Meetings:
N/A

Team Leaders:

San Diego:
Passing: Philip Rivers (688)
Rushing: Jackie Battle (124)
Receiving: Malcom Floyd (227)

Kansas City:
Passing: Matt Cassel (807)
Rushing: Jamaal Charles (323)
Receiving: Dwayne Bowe (234)

More:
Live Odds
In-Depth Matchup Information
Consensus Betting Information

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 6659
Posted: #2
I agree but you can beat em if you bet the underdogs money line in a parlay each night...
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 44
Posted: #3

Go on the net and check this out...Chargers @ Steelers 11/16/2008....FYI, these are the reg refs.....

The Pittsburgh Steelers vs. San Diego Charger game just confirms what gamblers already knew. If NFL games aren't outright fixed, at the very least there are strong influential factors from the game within the game that effect the outcome of some contests. The Steeler game is the shining example that wagering on professional football is officially acknowledged by the League in some capacity.

Down by 1 with 5 seconds to play and needing 80 yards for a winning score, the San Diego Chargers, who happened to be 4 point dogs, tried a desperate combination of laterals hoping for a miracle TD. The second of two legal backwards laterals was knocked down and then scooped up for a game covering TD by Troy Polamalu with no time left.

As the teams exited the field the referees huddled up and decided to review the play. Head referee Scott Green, in a sheepishly convoluted explanation, deemed the play an illegal forward pass that was therefore dead on the spot. The points were taken off, and Scott Green and crew hauled ass off the field. WTF? What illegal forward pass? There was none. Here's an AP interview with Scott Green, conducted by an AP reporter right after the game.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 5051
Posted: #4

     Been there-done that! I don't see any reason for a change of the bet. The Chargers do very well in KC, in this scenario, and team personel haven't changed that drastically.

SAN DIEGO  + 1

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 1827
Posted: #5
Vue - **BUMP** - hey Vue I'm with you, just waaaaaaaaaaaay too much offense not to take S.D. in a pick 'em this spot, I don't care what the home team is capable of............
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 746
Posted: #6
I like SD here also. San Diego decisively.  
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 482
Posted: #7
I DONT SEE SAN DIEGO LOSING IN THIS GAME HERE
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 746
Posted: #8
I'm pulling the plug on San Diego after they gave up last week. Chiefs didnt show any give up at NO. So no bet for me.  

ON paper SD should kill them but the game isnt played on paper. So refraining from this game.

I just have a bad feeling so not betting this one. Listening to my gut has saved me innumerable times. It is the subconscious mind speaking to you. The subconscious is the other 90 percent of the brian that nobody thinks we use.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 5
Posted: #9
Dont you think this is weird sandiego-1? Wtf.  No bet for me
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 20
Posted: #10

KC +1....home dog, tough place to play...I'm assuming KC is about healthy...they were missing some key players in the first couple of weeks.  I'll have to check the status of these guys, but my gut feeling is take the home team.  KC is not as bad as everyone thinks...as proven with that +9 gift last week at the saints.  Jamaal Charles is the real deal and if the young and talented KC defense is @ full strength, they should be able to do enough vs rivers and the chargers offense.  Remember who's coaching the chargers.  This humber guy that posts on here reminds me of a lot of people i know in vegas...people that can't win then look for excuses!!!!! 

Take a deep breath, possibly a new approach, look yourself in the mirror and say you can!!!

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 104
Posted: #11
SD IS GETTING +1

KC!
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 936
Posted: #12
Chiefs are good 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2005
Posts: 1433
Posted: #13
OVER
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 50
Posted: #14

KC is 11-4 su in its last 15 games playing at home aginst san diego,since nerv turner took over in 2007 the chargers are 19-20 september and october and 32-12 in november and beyond] san diego has lost the last 2 in KC, and the chargers are 4-10-1 ats in there last 15 meetings in kansas city] KC haveing the ralley like they did last week, they keep things hot this week>] taking KC AND THE OVER> NO PROBLUM

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2012
Posts: 56
Posted: #15

SDIEGO 32

KCity      28

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 89
Posted: #16
KC was actually at the - before, and now they give SD -1, wow, way to go, easy pick, KC to win small :)
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 4801
Posted: #17

KC is good at home, but i think Matthews gets going in this one.. if he can get on track, it should help Rivers in the passing game..

 

I think they get that done here

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 43
Posted: #18
San Diego By 14 Here.I like The Over Bearly. They Average 46.83 a Game so Hit It Before It s Gone
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 26
Posted: #19

I really like KC in this one... KC got off to a tough start... 3 top players suspended when they lost to ATL week 1 (actaully hung in there until the 4th), then tough spot at BUF week 2 who played great b/c they looked so bad against the Jets week 1. Then finally Week 3 they blew at New Orleans. Now week 4 at home against a familiar OVERATED foe in San Diego. I'm sorry but I don't get the hype with SD... what have they done recently besides get older and get rid of the their best deep threat? Ryan M is a BUST until proven otherwie... they beat OAK and TEN (2 team that WILL NOT SNIFF the playoffs) then they play a good team, at home and get CRUSHED!

Go KC.. but if you can't tell I am a closet San Diego hater and I really don't even know why. 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 4
Posted: #20
KC'S front four will pressure Rivers all day long making it ruff on philips and the passing game I look for a low scoring and a fieldgoal  will be the difference 23 20 SD wins
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 69
Posted: #21
It is 2012. Please join us. I have a sneaking suspicion you'd live a happier, better life if you'd simply let go of this game that happened four years ago. Kidding. (Mostly.) Let it go. Throw it into the ocean and forget.

Quote Originally Posted by HUMBERDWH:

Go on the net and check this out...Chargers @ Steelers 11/16/2008....FYI, these are the reg refs.....

The Pittsburgh Steelers vs. San Diego Charger game just confirms what gamblers already knew. If NFL games aren't outright fixed, at the very least there are strong influential factors from the game within the game that effect the outcome of some contests. The Steeler game is the shining example that wagering on professional football is officially acknowledged by the League in some capacity.

Down by 1 with 5 seconds to play and needing 80 yards for a winning score, the San Diego Chargers, who happened to be 4 point dogs, tried a desperate combination of laterals hoping for a miracle TD. The second of two legal backwards laterals was knocked down and then scooped up for a game covering TD by Troy Polamalu with no time left.

As the teams exited the field the referees huddled up and decided to review the play. Head referee Scott Green, in a sheepishly convoluted explanation, deemed the play an illegal forward pass that was therefore dead on the spot. The points were taken off, and Scott Green and crew hauled ass off the field. WTF? What illegal forward pass? There was none. Here's an AP interview with Scott Green, conducted by an AP reporter right after the game.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 105
Posted: #22
SD only dressing 3 CBs for the game....gonna make it tough to defend in some circumstances....looking for KC to spread them out
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 11877
Posted: #23
Chiefs +1.5

 Good luck 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 27
Posted: #24
Going under 44 in this one. The under is 4-0 in the last 4 between these two teams. Under in 9-0 in the last 9 KC vs AFC west. Under 7-1 in last 7 home games for KC. Good luck .

 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 141
Posted: #25
Give me the Chiefs here.....SD just looked horrible last week.  Too tough for Norv and Rivers today.

Chiefs +1
GL to all!!
All Forums | Pro Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.