There's a better bet out there
Which one?
I agree. I thought the Vikings would play the Bears tougher last week and got hurt fading the Bears. The Bears were smart and exposed the Vikings with a lot of 3 step drops and short passes. This was a smart plan to keep Cutler safe, but I think the Seahawks match up much better against this team. They have the corners to man up and can bring the blitz against a very shakey offensive line that will be without the services of right guard Lance Louis, who was absolutely leveled by Jared Allen last week.
I worry about the Seahawks being able to move the ball against this defense. My hope is that the Bears will be a step slower on the defensive side of the ball. Lance Briggs will definitely not be a 100% as he was seen walking around in a boot after last week's game. And Tillman, one of the best corners in the league, is still listed as questionable with an ankle injury. I don't think Seattle will "light up the scoreboard" at Soldier Field this Sunday, but I think they have the tools in play a very competitive game. Just keep in mind who the Bears have faced the past few weeks: the 49ers led by Frank Gore, the Vikings led by AP (who surprisingly came up w a 100 yd day despite a losing effort), and now the Seahawks led by Marshawn Lynch. Seems like their defense can't catch a break and are going up against some of the best running games in the league in 3 consecutive weeks.
Having Devin Hester out doesn't seem like that big of a deal to me given he hasn't done much all season, but its still one less thing Seattle doesn't have to account for. And for those of you who forgot, Alshon Jeffery just had his knee scoped, so he won't be in action. It would seem the Bears just don't have the right personnel to light up the scoreboard. Obviosuly Brandon Marshall is always a threat, but the Seahawks will have the medicine for him and probably mimic the 49er gameplan from 2 weeks ago.
The Bears only put up 3 points in last weeks second half, and I don't think that bodes well for them when they step up in class and play the Seahawks defense.
I guess what I am trying to say is I like the Seahawks to win or lose this game by a fg or so, in a low scoring game.
Seattle 17
Chicago 13
good luck
I agree. I thought the Vikings would play the Bears tougher last week and got hurt fading the Bears. The Bears were smart and exposed the Vikings with a lot of 3 step drops and short passes. This was a smart plan to keep Cutler safe, but I think the Seahawks match up much better against this team. They have the corners to man up and can bring the blitz against a very shakey offensive line that will be without the services of right guard Lance Louis, who was absolutely leveled by Jared Allen last week.
I worry about the Seahawks being able to move the ball against this defense. My hope is that the Bears will be a step slower on the defensive side of the ball. Lance Briggs will definitely not be a 100% as he was seen walking around in a boot after last week's game. And Tillman, one of the best corners in the league, is still listed as questionable with an ankle injury. I don't think Seattle will "light up the scoreboard" at Soldier Field this Sunday, but I think they have the tools in play a very competitive game. Just keep in mind who the Bears have faced the past few weeks: the 49ers led by Frank Gore, the Vikings led by AP (who surprisingly came up w a 100 yd day despite a losing effort), and now the Seahawks led by Marshawn Lynch. Seems like their defense can't catch a break and are going up against some of the best running games in the league in 3 consecutive weeks.
Having Devin Hester out doesn't seem like that big of a deal to me given he hasn't done much all season, but its still one less thing Seattle doesn't have to account for. And for those of you who forgot, Alshon Jeffery just had his knee scoped, so he won't be in action. It would seem the Bears just don't have the right personnel to light up the scoreboard. Obviosuly Brandon Marshall is always a threat, but the Seahawks will have the medicine for him and probably mimic the 49er gameplan from 2 weeks ago.
The Bears only put up 3 points in last weeks second half, and I don't think that bodes well for them when they step up in class and play the Seahawks defense.
I guess what I am trying to say is I like the Seahawks to win or lose this game by a fg or so, in a low scoring game.
Seattle 17
Chicago 13
good luck
Liking the Bears herea lot, Line has dropped to 3 here. A rookie Qb in a tough spot against a very good def. I think SEA offense is very limited and the Bears offense will do just enough.
Bears @ home should & will get the job done, Look for a tight game ealry but Bears pull ahead in the second half to win by 10+.
BOL!!!
Liking the Bears herea lot, Line has dropped to 3 here. A rookie Qb in a tough spot against a very good def. I think SEA offense is very limited and the Bears offense will do just enough.
Bears @ home should & will get the job done, Look for a tight game ealry but Bears pull ahead in the second half to win by 10+.
BOL!!!
The key to this game will be Chicago's ability (or lack thereof) to protect their QB. To view the Bear O-line as undermanned and vulnerable today is to be too generous. The unit has allowed 35 sacks TY, third-most of any team in the league, and I don't see many easy ways to advance the football this afternoon.
The Week 2 defeat at Green Bay and Week 10 undressing at San Francisco demonstrated just how a voracious pass rush can decimate Cutler and the Bears' game plan.
Seattle's "D" (29 sacks) gotta be chomping at the proverbial bit.
Steady Seahawk QB Wilson (9 TDP 1 INT L5G) not making many mistakes and HC Carroll 11-1 ATS L12 as dog.
ThePredictor Sez:
Seattle +3
The key to this game will be Chicago's ability (or lack thereof) to protect their QB. To view the Bear O-line as undermanned and vulnerable today is to be too generous. The unit has allowed 35 sacks TY, third-most of any team in the league, and I don't see many easy ways to advance the football this afternoon.
The Week 2 defeat at Green Bay and Week 10 undressing at San Francisco demonstrated just how a voracious pass rush can decimate Cutler and the Bears' game plan.
Seattle's "D" (29 sacks) gotta be chomping at the proverbial bit.
Steady Seahawk QB Wilson (9 TDP 1 INT L5G) not making many mistakes and HC Carroll 11-1 ATS L12 as dog.
ThePredictor Sez:
Seattle +3
Seattle "Reverse Win" Power Play!
True, Seattle 1-5 on the road straight up. But Seattle 5-2 vs. point spread last 7 games! Chicago OL injuries big trouble against Seattle's pass-rush attack now with 29 sacks!
Will look for rookie QB Russell Wilson with 9 TDP his last five games to put up points, reverse Seattle as an underdog and win this one outright! And Pete Carroll 11-1 last 12 as underdog!
Seattle plus 3 over Chicago!
BOL to All
Seattle "Reverse Win" Power Play!
True, Seattle 1-5 on the road straight up. But Seattle 5-2 vs. point spread last 7 games! Chicago OL injuries big trouble against Seattle's pass-rush attack now with 29 sacks!
Will look for rookie QB Russell Wilson with 9 TDP his last five games to put up points, reverse Seattle as an underdog and win this one outright! And Pete Carroll 11-1 last 12 as underdog!
Seattle plus 3 over Chicago!
BOL to All
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.