Fixisin.net
It's coaching against all possibilities -- seachickens could onside kick, score a td or field goal , onside kick, and score again to tie or win. By refusing the safety, it eliminated that 0001% chance.
Had he of looked fired up like he just won the game, which is the usual with H I would lean toward his logic. But considering his body language and the score at the time, aot of money changed hands on that call, over 70 percent the last I checked. Never thought I'd see it with this team. Take a look at the Smith interception on the previous drive/ No receiver even close, right to the defender for the pick. And the thrid down Smith run. It appeared they were tryting not to score a TD and settle for the FG. All of which kept them from covering.
Not to call you out...but this post is wrong in so many ways.
A) SF wouldn't kick off to Seattle. It would be a safety...which means that SEATTLE would PUNT off to SF
B) You can't onside kick a punt...
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
