Saint Louis is playing solid defense, but not good enough to hold that Seattle offense scoreless (that touchdown they have on the board is basically attributed to the defense).
Just as I stated back on that Central Florida/Louisville thread (Post #64) on my list of “crooks,” at that point Russell Wilson wasn’t a confirmed bandit, but tonight’s performance let’s me know he HAS taken a bite of the “poison apple” (The Wise Men in Vegas own him now).
I’m NOT telling on anybody… I’m just saying…
I need a copy of that report on my desk by Friday 9:oo A.M.
Saint Louis is playing solid defense, but not good enough to hold that Seattle offense scoreless (that touchdown they have on the board is basically attributed to the defense).
Just as I stated back on that Central Florida/Louisville thread (Post #64) on my list of “crooks,” at that point Russell Wilson wasn’t a confirmed bandit, but tonight’s performance let’s me know he HAS taken a bite of the “poison apple” (The Wise Men in Vegas own him now).
I’m NOT telling on anybody… I’m just saying…
I need a copy of that report on my desk by Friday 9:oo A.M.
Saint Louis is playing solid defense, but not good enough to hold that Seattle offense scoreless (that touchdown they have on the board is basically attributed to the defense).
Just as I stated back on that Central Florida/Louisville thread (Post #64) on my list of “crooks,” at that point Russell Wilson wasn’t a confirmed bandit, but tonight’s performance let’s me know he HAS taken a bite of the “poison apple” (The Wise Men in Vegas own him now).
I’m
NOT telling on anybody… I’m just saying…
Saint Louis is playing solid defense, but not good enough to hold that Seattle offense scoreless (that touchdown they have on the board is basically attributed to the defense).
Just as I stated back on that Central Florida/Louisville thread (Post #64) on my list of “crooks,” at that point Russell Wilson wasn’t a confirmed bandit, but tonight’s performance let’s me know he HAS taken a bite of the “poison apple” (The Wise Men in Vegas own him now).
I’m
NOT telling on anybody… I’m just saying…
Saint Louis is playing solid defense, but not good enough to hold that Seattle offense scoreless (that touchdown they have on the board is basically attributed to the defense).
Just as I stated back on that Central Florida/Louisville thread (Post #64) on my list of “crooks,” at that point Russell Wilson wasn’t a confirmed bandit, but tonight’s performance let’s me know he HAS taken a bite of the “poison apple” (The Wise Men in Vegas own him now).
I’m
NOT telling on anybody… I’m just saying…
Saint Louis is playing solid defense, but not good enough to hold that Seattle offense scoreless (that touchdown they have on the board is basically attributed to the defense).
Just as I stated back on that Central Florida/Louisville thread (Post #64) on my list of “crooks,” at that point Russell Wilson wasn’t a confirmed bandit, but tonight’s performance let’s me know he HAS taken a bite of the “poison apple” (The Wise Men in Vegas own him now).
I’m
NOT telling on anybody… I’m just saying…
Saint Louis is playing solid defense, but not good enough to hold that Seattle offense scoreless (that touchdown they have on the board is basically attributed to the defense).
Just as I stated back on that Central Florida/Louisville thread (Post #64) on my list of “crooks,” at that point Russell Wilson wasn’t a confirmed bandit, but tonight’s performance let’s me know he HAS taken a bite of the “poison apple” (The Wise Men in Vegas own him now).
I’m
NOT telling on anybody… I’m just saying…
Saint Louis is playing solid defense, but not good enough to hold that Seattle offense scoreless (that touchdown they have on the board is basically attributed to the defense).
Just as I stated back on that Central Florida/Louisville thread (Post #64) on my list of “crooks,” at that point Russell Wilson wasn’t a confirmed bandit, but tonight’s performance let’s me know he HAS taken a bite of the “poison apple” (The Wise Men in Vegas own him now).
I’m
NOT telling on anybody… I’m just saying…
6-0 ATS is very impressive! Congratulations!!
(You should however post all your games here on Covers if you going to make that claim the next time. Just saying........)
Seattle is the easy side to pick. I think the Seahawks is awesome team! But every Tom, person, and Harry have picked Seattle ATS tonight.
I just think on Monday Night when it's the only game in town, I cannot see Vegas paying off everyone. They already gave the public a gift on Sunday Night with GB. Can not see two gifts in a row.
If you have to play tonight, side with VEGAS and go with the HOME DOG. If you have to play Seattle, go soft. Seattle will probably win the game, but I'm not sure about covering the spread. Hard to believe but that's how it goes sometimes.......
You actually think the games are fixed. It doesn't matter how much vegas doesn't want to pay off the public again the facts are rams are in turmoil they cant stop the run and cant move the ball at all. Take it from a person from st. Louis rams lose by at least 21 in this game.
6-0 ATS is very impressive! Congratulations!!
(You should however post all your games here on Covers if you going to make that claim the next time. Just saying........)
Seattle is the easy side to pick. I think the Seahawks is awesome team! But every Tom, person, and Harry have picked Seattle ATS tonight.
I just think on Monday Night when it's the only game in town, I cannot see Vegas paying off everyone. They already gave the public a gift on Sunday Night with GB. Can not see two gifts in a row.
If you have to play tonight, side with VEGAS and go with the HOME DOG. If you have to play Seattle, go soft. Seattle will probably win the game, but I'm not sure about covering the spread. Hard to believe but that's how it goes sometimes.......
You actually think the games are fixed. It doesn't matter how much vegas doesn't want to pay off the public again the facts are rams are in turmoil they cant stop the run and cant move the ball at all. Take it from a person from st. Louis rams lose by at least 21 in this game.
The Seahawks are good enough by 15 in this spot (or so says my computer). Actually, Bradford was not too bad this season steering the ship.. Since Bradford is out, and Brett Favre decided he had one too many concussions,plus the figures are based largely with Bradford in the lineup, this bet has some appeal. Actually, it's the Rams "D" that sucks!
SEATTLE - 13
The Seahawks are good enough by 15 in this spot (or so says my computer). Actually, Bradford was not too bad this season steering the ship.. Since Bradford is out, and Brett Favre decided he had one too many concussions,plus the figures are based largely with Bradford in the lineup, this bet has some appeal. Actually, it's the Rams "D" that sucks!
SEATTLE - 13
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.