Seattle is going to get to Griffin and if he runs they are going to make him pay. This defense that Pete Carroll has is the same type of guys he had while at USC. The 3 points is laughable. Washington blitz every down verses DAllas, that plan will not work against Seattle. Seattle covers
0
Seattle is going to get to Griffin and if he runs they are going to make him pay. This defense that Pete Carroll has is the same type of guys he had while at USC. The 3 points is laughable. Washington blitz every down verses DAllas, that plan will not work against Seattle. Seattle covers
Redskins still getting no respect even against an awful road team. RG3 is banged up but there option offense will run all over the middle of Seattles defense eventually bringing in Seattles corners. Take the points free field goal, suckers
0
Redskins still getting no respect even against an awful road team. RG3 is banged up but there option offense will run all over the middle of Seattles defense eventually bringing in Seattles corners. Take the points free field goal, suckers
Seattle ALL day. Skins won't be facing a limping Cowboys D + self destructo Romo this time around. Vegas is CORRECT in making the Skins the Home dog here. Don't over think it. BOL...
0
Seattle ALL day. Skins won't be facing a limping Cowboys D + self destructo Romo this time around. Vegas is CORRECT in making the Skins the Home dog here. Don't over think it. BOL...
SEA -2.5 : with RGIII less than 100%, I'll side with the surging Seahawks. The defensive edge is on Seattle's side (6.7 differential on the DHI). SCORE: Seahawks 28 - Redskins 20. SEA/WAS OVER 45.5
0
SEA -2.5 : with RGIII less than 100%, I'll side with the surging Seahawks. The defensive edge is on Seattle's side (6.7 differential on the DHI). SCORE: Seahawks 28 - Redskins 20. SEA/WAS OVER 45.5
C'mon now, everyone in here is always talkin' smack about the West Coast teams can't hack travelling to the East Coast time zones - no matter who's playing who, and now everyone's hands down on the Seahawks? Plus, the 'Skins are staying home rather than returning home? Plus, for all you stats guys, I'll give you some homework:
Since this franchise started in 1976 what's the overall history of the Seahawks ATS on the road? As the favorite???? Even easier to look up, have they ever been the road favorite?? This ain't the Steelers, people NOBODY in this stadium is going to be waving around their "Seattle Snotrag" or whatever their version of the Terrible Towel is.....
Like the song says: "Don't Go Chasin' Waterfalls"
The plus/minus on the line should be the other way around, but I'll take it.
'Skins +2.5
0
C'mon now, everyone in here is always talkin' smack about the West Coast teams can't hack travelling to the East Coast time zones - no matter who's playing who, and now everyone's hands down on the Seahawks? Plus, the 'Skins are staying home rather than returning home? Plus, for all you stats guys, I'll give you some homework:
Since this franchise started in 1976 what's the overall history of the Seahawks ATS on the road? As the favorite???? Even easier to look up, have they ever been the road favorite?? This ain't the Steelers, people NOBODY in this stadium is going to be waving around their "Seattle Snotrag" or whatever their version of the Terrible Towel is.....
Like the song says: "Don't Go Chasin' Waterfalls"
The plus/minus on the line should be the other way around, but I'll take it.
Tough one to call. 8 straight road playoff losses for Hawks, but this might be best defense in their history- so seems like a decent chance to end streak vs. banged up RGIII, but I still don't quite understand this line. Seems like a pick at best.
0
Tough one to call. 8 straight road playoff losses for Hawks, but this might be best defense in their history- so seems like a decent chance to end streak vs. banged up RGIII, but I still don't quite understand this line. Seems like a pick at best.
hey easypics when seattle blew out 'superbowl bound' niners they werent on the road and sf had just traveled back across the country from spanking ne.
Cheers Hellahigh.
Very true , however in relation to my post ,dig a little deeper weighing this game out. Out of last 7 Skin wins ,only one was vs a Playoff team. Other 2 playoff teams Skins faced was Cincy @ home + Falcs on road ( both losing causes) .
Skins barely beat Ravens in OT @ home led by Sacco's 3 TD's . Sacco , we all know has a substantial lower QB rating on road than home. Impressive ?
Regardless of travel wear coming off a non divisional game vs Pats, Frisco were at the time listed as Super Bowl favorites .Seattle's dominate divisional win over Frisco ,regardless of circumstances,shows team capability of beating the best and any other team under adverse conditions such as beating Bears on the road in recent weeks. Same can't be said for Skins who have not really beaten a quality team this year. IMO last week's unimpressive win , do or die scenario vs hated and inconsistent Cowboys highlights fact that Skins have little to none time to adjust to Seahawks who have a far better defense ,QB and Running game than Cowboys. Face it,Skins have not faced a Russel Wilson type led attack while Seahawks have recently gotten a good taste of a running Kapernick RG3 type.
Last but not least,highlighting fact that Skins have a considerably weaker defense than Seahawks, can you see Skins scoring more than 20 pts vs Seattle D that has allowed 24 + points only once all year ? Bet on it : Seahawks will score 27 + points. Not so certain with Skins.
Weather permitting.
GL
0
Quote Originally Posted by hellahigh:
hey easypics when seattle blew out 'superbowl bound' niners they werent on the road and sf had just traveled back across the country from spanking ne.
Cheers Hellahigh.
Very true , however in relation to my post ,dig a little deeper weighing this game out. Out of last 7 Skin wins ,only one was vs a Playoff team. Other 2 playoff teams Skins faced was Cincy @ home + Falcs on road ( both losing causes) .
Skins barely beat Ravens in OT @ home led by Sacco's 3 TD's . Sacco , we all know has a substantial lower QB rating on road than home. Impressive ?
Regardless of travel wear coming off a non divisional game vs Pats, Frisco were at the time listed as Super Bowl favorites .Seattle's dominate divisional win over Frisco ,regardless of circumstances,shows team capability of beating the best and any other team under adverse conditions such as beating Bears on the road in recent weeks. Same can't be said for Skins who have not really beaten a quality team this year. IMO last week's unimpressive win , do or die scenario vs hated and inconsistent Cowboys highlights fact that Skins have little to none time to adjust to Seahawks who have a far better defense ,QB and Running game than Cowboys. Face it,Skins have not faced a Russel Wilson type led attack while Seahawks have recently gotten a good taste of a running Kapernick RG3 type.
Last but not least,highlighting fact that Skins have a considerably weaker defense than Seahawks, can you see Skins scoring more than 20 pts vs Seattle D that has allowed 24 + points only once all year ? Bet on it : Seahawks will score 27 + points. Not so certain with Skins.
Very true , however in relation to my post ,dig a little deeper weighing this game out. Out of last 7 Skin wins ,only one was vs a Playoff team. Other 2 playoff teams Skins faced was Cincy @ home + Falcs on road ( both losing causes) .
Skins barely beat Ravens in OT @ home led by Sacco's 3 TD's . Sacco , we all know has a substantial lower QB rating on road than home. Impressive ?
Regardless of travel wear coming off a non divisional game vs Pats, Frisco were at the time listed as Super Bowl favorites .Seattle's dominate divisional win over Frisco ,regardless of circumstances,shows team capability of beating the best and any other team under adverse conditions such as beating Bears on the road in recent weeks. Same can't be said for Skins who have not really beaten a quality team this year. IMO last week's unimpressive win , do or die scenario vs hated and inconsistent Cowboys highlights fact that Skins have little to none time to adjust to Seahawks who have a far better defense ,QB and Running game than Cowboys. Face it,Skins have not faced a Russel Wilson type led attack while Seahawks have recently gotten a good taste of a running Kapernick RG3 type.
Last but not least,highlighting fact that Skins have a considerably weaker defense than Seahawks, can you see Skins scoring more than 20 pts vs Seattle D that has allowed 24 + points only once all year ? Bet on it : Seahawks will score 27 + points. Not so certain with Skins.
Weather permitting.
GL
The one thing you're not accounting for is that the Seahawks have also only played 1 playoff team in the last 7 game & are 3-5 on the road this year with one of those road wins was in Toronto. Seahawks have only played 1 playoff team on the road & that was a loss in Frisco. Seattle is a great home team but very beatable on the road. I'll take the home underdog. I'm thinking this year's wild card round will probably be just last last years with all 4 home teams winning. With a few exceptions the first round the past few years usually goes to the home team with most of the games not being all that close
0
Quote Originally Posted by easypics:
Cheers Hellahigh.
Very true , however in relation to my post ,dig a little deeper weighing this game out. Out of last 7 Skin wins ,only one was vs a Playoff team. Other 2 playoff teams Skins faced was Cincy @ home + Falcs on road ( both losing causes) .
Skins barely beat Ravens in OT @ home led by Sacco's 3 TD's . Sacco , we all know has a substantial lower QB rating on road than home. Impressive ?
Regardless of travel wear coming off a non divisional game vs Pats, Frisco were at the time listed as Super Bowl favorites .Seattle's dominate divisional win over Frisco ,regardless of circumstances,shows team capability of beating the best and any other team under adverse conditions such as beating Bears on the road in recent weeks. Same can't be said for Skins who have not really beaten a quality team this year. IMO last week's unimpressive win , do or die scenario vs hated and inconsistent Cowboys highlights fact that Skins have little to none time to adjust to Seahawks who have a far better defense ,QB and Running game than Cowboys. Face it,Skins have not faced a Russel Wilson type led attack while Seahawks have recently gotten a good taste of a running Kapernick RG3 type.
Last but not least,highlighting fact that Skins have a considerably weaker defense than Seahawks, can you see Skins scoring more than 20 pts vs Seattle D that has allowed 24 + points only once all year ? Bet on it : Seahawks will score 27 + points. Not so certain with Skins.
Weather permitting.
GL
The one thing you're not accounting for is that the Seahawks have also only played 1 playoff team in the last 7 game & are 3-5 on the road this year with one of those road wins was in Toronto. Seahawks have only played 1 playoff team on the road & that was a loss in Frisco. Seattle is a great home team but very beatable on the road. I'll take the home underdog. I'm thinking this year's wild card round will probably be just last last years with all 4 home teams winning. With a few exceptions the first round the past few years usually goes to the home team with most of the games not being all that close
however... if i do bet... there is only one way i can go, and that's Seattle... you are a fool if you bet against this team... problem is, you are a fool if you bet against the Skins, too...
0
however... if i do bet... there is only one way i can go, and that's Seattle... you are a fool if you bet against this team... problem is, you are a fool if you bet against the Skins, too...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
