All Forums | Pro Football

St. Louis at Chicago (12/06/2009)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 2561
Posts: 28
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2002
Posts: 61
Posted: #1

Away:  St. Louis [5-6 ATS]
Home:  Chicago [4-7 ATS]

Game Time: 1:00 PM
Stadium: Soldier Field

Recent Meetings:
N/A

Team Leaders:

St. Louis:
Passing: Marc Bulger (1469)
Rushing: Steven Jackson (1120)
Receiving: Donnie Avery (466)

Chicago:
Passing: Jay Cutler (2671)
Rushing: Matt Forte (543)
Receiving: Devin Hester (634)

More:
Live Odds
In-Depth Matchup Information
Consensus Betting Information

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 644
Posted: #2
Cutler throw for 5 pics and loses job
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 355
Posted: #3
st.lou +9
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 20644
Posted: #4

Chicago - 24                     St Louis - 17

Rams +9                    

I think da bears would be happy to get a win in this one. Covering 9  well that's another story.....Rams +9 McG

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 22502
Posted: #5
Chicago wins, Rams cover.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 18
Posted: #6
How could the bears be a 9 point favorite???  It should be like 3 or 4.  Rams moneyline!!!
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 984
Posted: #7
STL +9: the Bears are not dominant enough to be laying 9 points, even if it is vs. the lowly lambs. This play is mostly against the Bears rather than for the St. Louis. Score: Rams 28-Bears 21 (1 unit).
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2002
Posts: 67
Posted: #8

Love the Over

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 5051
Posted: #9
  My favorite team, Chicago, appears to have thrown in the towel, for the season. At least this is the impression I'm left with on their website they send me! With that being said, there is a remote possibility that they might win SU. However, the Lambs of late are at least trying, and showing some semblance of playing form. Because I do like making money will venture into the unknown, and make a rather substantial wager on St. Louis! (And pray like hell!!)
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 883
Posted: #10

STL for the 9+ is this something Vegas wants us to think and for us to take the lowly Rams?

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 52
Posted: #11

Quote Originally Posted by afasamoan:

With Bulger back the dogs look tasty but then again with Steven Jackson done for the season maybe not. I love the Bears even though Hesters out

 

Wow, I hope no one takes this guy's posts seriously

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 102
Posted: #12
I do! The Rams dont have to win.
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 63
Posted: #13
Behind Bashir, Nemets, Frumhold and Delver they can't lose
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 888
Posted: #14
I hate to say but I think the bears are going to lose at home to the Rams.  They have nothing to play for and they are finally realizing that the suck, especially on defense.  i think Cutler will play well and we should be able to put up some points but I don't see the defense coming with the hunger that will be needed to stop Jackson. 

Rams

over
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 5485
Posted: #15
da bears
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 313
Posted: #16
Chicago wins and covers on this one.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 730
Posted: #17
St. Louis +10 (-116) [1 Unit]
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 749
Posted: #18
I don't know which game sucks more, this one or Tampa/Carolina.

Fuck it, I can't back Cutler.

Rams.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 634
Posted: #19

Cutler HAS to have a good game this year, doesn't he?  A dome team coming to the cold weather.  9.5 seems like a lot of points for a team like the Bears to be giving, but I am with the public on this one (60%). 

St. Louis - 16

Chicago - 27

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 99
Posted: #20
Unfortunately this game has to be played. However I won't be spending any time on channel 710 watching it. Funny the sense of humor the good lord has............isn't it ?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 97
Posted: #21

This is a lot of points for a bad CHI team

I wouldn't want to rely on STL to cover to win on a tix but I will lean here for them to cover

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 1142
Posted: #22
St. Louis +9.5
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 2271
Posted: #23
Both team suck so I'll take the points. STL 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2003
Posts: 1600
Posted: #24

Rams have had only two games with both halves going over 20 - Indy and Saints.  Bears ain't Indy and the Saints.

1st Half under

if it doesn’t hit

chase 2nd Half under

 

 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 3457
Posted: #25
I'll take the points here.  ST. Louis can run the ball and the Bears forgot how too.  Bears might even lose. 
All Forums | Pro Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.