All Forums | Pro Golf

Biggest. Scam. Ever

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1599
Posts: 17
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 3387
Posted: #1
Tiger vs Phil is PAY PER VIEW!! This is not a major. this is not the 2 best golfers, not even close. These 2 do not deserve any more money.

Pay per view. This is not conor mcgregor. This is not floyd mayweather. The winner of the fedex cup gets 10 mil, how is this for 9 mil?

This is how it will go: They both tee off, then 5 minutes of comercials, then they both hit again, then 5 minutes of commercials. This will go on 70 more times, maybe more if phil can't find his ball or tiger or less if tiger hits a fairway.

Paying to watch ads. 

I hated this the moment it leaked, and it wasn't even ppv yet. I never wanted to watch it but now I HAVE to steal it.

Go bang some more hookers and get in accidents on drugs. Go lose millions gambling. Here's all the second chances you need
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 3387
Posted: #2
Couple typing mistakes but no matter. U guys got half the rant I gave my gf. I'd rather watch Jon Daly. 

Liddell vs Tito 3 isnt even going to be pay per view!!!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 26914
Posted: #3
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2001
Posts: 85256
Posted: #4
agree 100%. this thing will be a total embarrassment to the great game of golf. do EITHER one really CARE ??? like you said it is NOT Palmer vs Nicklaus in their prime OR Dustin Johnson vs Brooks Koepka (OR Justin Thomas in that mix maybe a "three way" "skins" style match)
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 3387
Posted: #5
Quote Originally Posted by LeRinkRat:

agree 100%. this thing will be a total embarrassment to the great game of golf. do EITHER one really CARE ??? like you said it is NOT Palmer vs Nicklaus in their prime OR Dustin Johnson vs Brooks Koepka (OR Justin Thomas in that mix maybe a "three way" "skins" style match)
right?

even a francesco stensen fowler johnson(as much as i hate him) rory koepka JT. a lot of the good ones. it would be difficult but make the final of the  fedex cup final match 3 events or something. have a night match with spotlights on certain spots, ocean view, anything. maybe have an all star match and do the above i dont know. it's odd and i hope it's a massive failure, though they'd never admit it
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 59001
Posted: #6
Post 6 is only one that matters.
22nd
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 798
Posted: #7

Quote Originally Posted by Hawky:

Tiger vs Phil is PAY PER VIEW!! This is not a major. this is not the 2 best golfers, not even close. These 2 do not deserve any more money.Pay per view. This is not conor mcgregor. This is not floyd mayweather. The winner of the fedex cup gets 10 mil, how is this for 9 mil?This is how it will go: They both tee off, then 5 minutes of comercials, then they both hit again, then 5 minutes of commercials. This will go on 70 more times, maybe more if phil can't find his ball or tiger or less if tiger hits a fairway.Paying to watch ads. I hated this the moment it leaked, and it wasn't even ppv yet. I never wanted to watch it but now I HAVE to steal it.Go bang some more hookers and get in accidents on drugs. Go lose millions gambling. Here's all the second chances you need

Then don't buy it.  It's $25, my god relax.  It's not geared toward you anyway.  It's geared to the true golf fan who grew up watching the best and THAT was Tiger and Phil.  If something like this makes you cry this much you have major issues. 

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 13879
Posted: #8
Quote Originally Posted by Illwildcats:

Then don't buy it.  It's $25, my god relax.  It's not geared toward you anyway.  It's geared to the true golf fan who grew up watching the best and THAT was Tiger and Phil.  If something like this makes you cry this much you have major issues. 



I'm buying it!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 3387
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by Illwildcats:

Then don't buy it.  It's $25, my god relax.  It's not geared toward you anyway.  It's geared to the true golf fan who grew up watching the best and THAT was Tiger and Phil.  If something like this makes you cry this much you have major issues. 


I already said I wasn't going to, ya dummy. I am a true golf fan. I'm not crying. I'm pointing out how idiots like you still waste money on this crap which will only be ads and political popaganda. bay bayyy
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 36739
Posted: #10

I'd lean towards no commercials, both golfers mic'd up for the whole thing...and I'm in.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2014
Posts: 1547
Posted: #11
I’m not buying this either. 
I also consider myself a true golf fan. 
I would buy it if the loser paid his hard cash to the winner or loser pays half and sponsors pay other half. 
Now that’d be fun to watch. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 1255
Posted: #12
there are plenty of options to stream online. just check reddit
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 16675
Posted: #13
So much incorrect information from the OP here...

Do you understand how PPV works?  The point is to ELIMINATE commercials.  

And Chuck vs Tito 3 is, in fact, on PPV.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2010
Posts: 2306
Posted: #14
It was a debacle. We will probably never see an event like this again.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 13879
Posted: #15
I was a little disappointed. Not enough talk between the two. Eldrick went into his shell to often and shut out Phil. Where was all the betting? Ya they bet a few times, but there were so many chances they could have interacted more. Like the dead air while walking down the fairway. Make some tweaks and maybe it'll be a little more interesting next time.....if there is another time!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 3387
Posted: #16

Quote Originally Posted by SkySky:

It was a debacle. We will probably never see an event like this again.

people will forget and they'll remake this on before they go champions tour, then again 6 years later on the champions tour

 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 3387
Posted: #17

Quote Originally Posted by FadeOnly:

So much incorrect information from the OP here...Do you understand how PPV works?  The point is to ELIMINATE commercials.  And Chuck vs Tito 3 is, in fact, on PPV.

 

the fight was still unsure about ppv at OP time, bud. and soo much incorrect info? ur dumb.

 

tiger phil saw 750000 bought ppvs, and tito chuck 3 got 30000 views. i didnt watch, was it all ads? so why all the movie ads and beer ads and whatnot for ufc ppvs? is that how you ELIMINATE ads? i'm learning a lot here

All Forums | Pro Golf
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright � 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.