All Forums | Pro Golf

Tiger Will Not Win Another Major

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 64382
Posts: 364
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 3018
Posted: #251
Quote Originally Posted by lancer89074:



And yet all of that being said, I could kick your fucking ass.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 7432
Posted: #252
Do you guys realize he still finished t15 among the best players in the world?
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 19693
Posted: #253
You do realize Tiger cannot putt?
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 15753
Posted: #254

Qmich that is a sick photo man

Tiger will win couple PGA tour events and im thinking Masters by 3 shots....

ANY GIVEN SUNDAY...............

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 166
Posted: #255
"when you get beat on Sunday by 56 players in the field you know you got some major problems".

No, no, no, stupid...it means you had a bad day.

I bet most of us on here wouldn't mind Tigers "major problems".

Where did his "major problems" go the first 3 rounds?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 4255
Posted: #256
1) Tiger will dwarf Jack;
2) PGA and the networks will $$$$ Bank off Tiger;
3) Tiger has issues eg re Sammy and Mark's 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2001
Posts: 34488
Posted: #257
He'll win 2 this year at least.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 59253
Posted: #258
Quote Originally Posted by clepto:

He'll win 2 this year at least.
It must have killed you to not post till now.You could be Dan Hicks brother never seen anyone lick his nuts as much.  Blister seems to have healed up good hope it holds up for Masters.
Article 134
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2001
Posts: 34488
Posted: #259
Jacks record is all but toast.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 1906
Posted: #260
Quote Originally Posted by clepto:

Jacks record is all but toast.

Jack's record is all safe.  Tiger too old, too many injuries.


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 3018
Posted: #261
Quote Originally Posted by lancer89074:

As the Juiceman is stumblin' and bumblin' he is making Vegas Veteran look like some kind of Nostradamus. It is almost too painful to watch Woods now.

He has become a shadowy caricature of himself. After that round, need I say that his confidence is shot and I mean in the 'big picture' sense of the word.

I give Vegas Veteran his props and that is as it should be. He put up with all kinds of flack from the assorted ball lickers and 'dead between the ears' dupes of the media.

Woods may indeed never win another tournament again let alone a major as earlier stated by VV. He has met his Buster Douglas and his Waterloo.
....  Golfers all have two stages in their golf life... Jack went two years at just about Tigers age.. without a major win.. Stage two has started... wont win again....... said it very early in this thread  if you could break 100 you knew Tiger was far from done...
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 59253
Posted: #262
Quote Originally Posted by ArtSchlichterJr:

....  Golfers all have two stages in their golf life... Jack went two years at just about Tigers age.. without a major win.. Stage two has started... wont win again....... said it very early in this thread  if you could break 100 you knew Tiger was far from done...
Look out Jack, he might not lose a tourney from here on out, not just this year but ever.
Article 134
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 37070
Posted: #263
Quote Originally Posted by PokerProErik:


Jack's record is all safe.  Tiger too old, too many injuries.



 If Fred Couples could putt he would've won the Masters 2-3 years ago........at age 49-50.......with a bad back.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 15753
Posted: #264

Cant putt????

Before his win he had made 81 of 91 putts within 10 feet of the hole in last 7 rounds.

That is class above

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 3018
Posted: #265
Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76:

Look out Jack, he might not lose a tourney from here on out, not just this year but ever.
Jack was the best ever before Tiger.. But by  the time he quits Tiger will hold EVERY record in the books (owns 95% of them now) and they will stand like forever as the fields today are LIGHT YEARS ahead of Arnie's or Jacks field from top to bottom as golf on the tour is now a true International field not just Gary Player coming in and teeing it up..
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 9634
Posted: #266
Quote Originally Posted by ArtSchlichterJr:

Jack was the best ever before Tiger.. But by  the time he quits Tiger will hold EVERY record in the books (owns 95% of them now) and they will stand like forever as the fields today are LIGHT YEARS ahead of Arnie's or Jacks field from top to bottom as golf on the tour is now a true International field not just Gary Player coming in and teeing it up..


Again, Nicklaus faced Palmer, Player, Watson, Miller, Trevino et. al. Out of Tiger's competition put up a similar group of competitors and name names. Of course you can't. Els, Singh and Mickelson are not in their league. Nicklaus also had 19 second place finishes in the majors which translates to some pretty fierce battles with his competition which you scorn.

Beating the old geezers this week (Els, Singh, Mickelson) and a struggling McDowell proved nothing to me. Of course it was enough for you to jump on the old Woods bandwagon again.

Time will prove one of us wrong. The ravages of time are taking their toll on Woods just like any other human and though he looked good remember who his competition was this past week. No, Ian Poulter and Bubba Watson are not that good and do not make for great competition for the ages.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 59253
Posted: #267
Quote Originally Posted by lancer89074:



Again, Nicklaus faced Palmer, Player, Watson, Miller, Trevino et. al. Out of Tiger's competition put up a similar group of competitors and name names. Of course you can't. Els, Singh and Mickelson are not in their league. Nicklaus also had 19 second place finishes in the majors which translates to some pretty fierce battles with his competition which you scorn.

Beating the old geezers this week (Els, Singh, Mickelson) and a struggling McDowell proved nothing to me. Of course it was enough for you to jump on the old Woods bandwagon again.

Time will prove one of us wrong. The ravages of time are taking their toll on Woods just like any other human and though he looked good remember who his competition was this past week. No, Ian Poulter and Bubba Watson are not that good and do not make for great competition for the ages.
Can you please look at how many tourneys Phil has won and Majors won then list for me the guys who have at least the same in wins and majors.  Thanks.
Article 134
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 3018
Posted: #268
Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76:

Can you please look at how many tourneys Phil has won and Majors won then list for me the guys who have at least the same in wins and majors.  Thanks.
Give the man a cigar... Sorry but if ANYONE thinks todays fields are not stronger then Jacks field from top to bottom then they dont understand golf.. sorry...In Jacks day the fields were top heavy because the bottom of the field had NC of winning because of  a severe lack of talent. Todays bottom feeders are PLAYERS with game... Golf is now an International game played by a ton of true athletes.. Back in Jacks day it was rich white kids  (mostly fat out of shape locals who shined) playing the game for the most.. Not today because of the money before Arnie there was NO MONEY in golf.. Sure it was loaded on top in Jacks day but after the top ten alot of average talent.. They made the top ten look better then they were.. Look no further then the number of new winners the last three years its unreal and bears out the strength of the fields today..
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 9634
Posted: #269
Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76:

Can you please look at how many tourneys Phil has won and Majors won then list for me the guys who have at least the same in wins and majors.  Thanks.


In head to head competition against Tiger Woods, Phil Mickelson has finished in first place four times to Tiger's second place.

None of those tournament wins over Tiger by Mickelson were in one of the four major tournaments.

Nicklaus finished in second place 19 times in major tournaments alone. Let that stat seep into your brain a moment.

Five times Woods has been beaten in major tournaments and finished in second place and none of those guys who beat Tiger were named Phil Mickelson.

Mickelson has won 40 tournaments in his career with 4 victories in the majors. Palmer had 62 tournament wins and 7 majors. Sam Snead had 82 tournament victories and 7 majors. Billy Casper had 51 tournament wins and only 3 majors. Tom Watson had 39  tournament wins and 8 majors. Mickelson also has come up very small with testicles the size of beebees when he has had to play against
Tiger Woods.

If Mickelson has been the fiercest of Wood's competitors (which is subject to debate) over the years, then Woods has gotten a free ride in his dominance of the sport.

Of course we do not know how much performance enhancing drugs might have played a part in Woods career so his dominance is debatable now also.

Also my original point was that Nicklaus faced much fiercer competition in his day from Palmer, Player, Miller, Trevino, Watson, Casper, Snead et. al. Put together a list of  players that Woods played against that matches those names with their level of competitiveness.

Of course you can't. Watson almost won the British Open a few years at the age of 60. That shows you what kind of competitor he was and those other guys listed were ugly tough to beat in their day.




 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 3018
Posted: #270
Quote Originally Posted by lancer89074:



In head to head competition against Tiger Woods, Phil Mickelson has finished in first place four times to Tiger's second place.

None of those tournament wins over Tiger by Mickelson were in one of the four major tournaments.

Nicklaus finished in second place 19 times in major tournaments alone. Let that stat seep into your brain a moment.

Five times Woods has been beaten in major tournaments and finished in second place and none of those guys who beat Tiger were named Phil Mickelson.

Mickelson has won 40 tournaments in his career with 4 victories in the majors. Palmer had 62 tournament wins and 7 majors. Sam Snead had 82 tournament victories and 7 majors. Billy Casper had 51 tournament wins and only 3 majors. Tom Watson had 39  tournament wins and 8 majors. Mickelson also has come up very small with testicles the size of beebees when he has had to play against
Tiger Woods.

If Mickelson has been the fiercest of Wood's competitors (which is subject to debate) over the years, then Woods has gotten a free ride in his dominance of the sport.

Of course we do not know how much performance enhancing drugs might have played a part in Woods career so his dominance is debatable now also.

Also my original point was that Nicklaus faced much fiercer competition in his day from Palmer, Player, Miller, Trevino, Watson, Casper, Snead et. al. Put together a list of  players that Woods played against that matches those names with their level of competitiveness.

Of course you can't. Watson almost won the British Open a few years at the age of 60. That shows you what kind of competitor he was and those other guys listed were ugly tough to beat in their day.




LMAO ... Sorry my friend if you think even for a minute that todays fields are weaker fron TOP TO BOTTOM then in Jack's day then we cannot hold an informed debate because you are just clueless.. Sorry... go shoot 100 at your local muni ...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 4255
Posted: #271
Many more 2 come for Woods he's got 2 much talent and the networks have2 much at steak....forthcoming next week at the Masters back in the zone now as he will dwarf his foes to the dismay of Stevie & Co...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 3018
Posted: #272
Quote Originally Posted by lancer89074:

As the Juiceman is stumblin' and bumblin' he is making Vegas Veteran look like some kind of Nostradamus. It is almost too painful to watch Woods now.

He has become a shadowy caricature of himself. After that round, need I say that his confidence is shot and I mean in the 'big picture' sense of the word.

I give Vegas Veteran his props and that is as it should be. He put up with all kinds of flack from the assorted ball lickers and 'dead between the ears' dupes of the media.

Woods may indeed never win another tournament again let alone a major as earlier stated by VV. He has met his Buster Douglas and his Waterloo.
  .....  ..... great call....
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 3042
Posted: #273
NICE BUMP ART, YOU JACKASS....  i hate the haters!!!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 4574
Posted: #274
wish this fucker was here for this
 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2001
Posts: 34488
Posted: #275
Tiger is a lock  Major #15 this week...
All Forums | Pro Golf
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.