5 early golf plays (2 are 1/2 units against same guy Henley) could t decide if I wanted Zalatoris or Kokrak so split it in 1/2
I like to get down early before lines move
Sabbatini +125 v Todd 1 unit Zalatoris +100 v Henley 1/2 unit Kokrak -115 v Henley 1/2 unit Pereira -110 v Schwartzel 1 unit Macintyre -115 v Scott 1 unit Simpson -120 v Matsuyama
will writeup later
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
5 early golf plays (2 are 1/2 units against same guy Henley) could t decide if I wanted Zalatoris or Kokrak so split it in 1/2
I like to get down early before lines move
Sabbatini +125 v Todd 1 unit Zalatoris +100 v Henley 1/2 unit Kokrak -115 v Henley 1/2 unit Pereira -110 v Schwartzel 1 unit Macintyre -115 v Scott 1 unit Simpson -120 v Matsuyama
no good reason as Henley should be ok but I am not a Hugh Henley fan. I think Henley should be ok this week so wouldn’t be surprised if I lose. just think both Zalatoris and Kokrak are better
adding
Gooch -110 v Van Rooyen
so here is my abridged analysis in order but not necessarily how much I lime
Sabatini +125 v Todd
Sabbatini wasn’t good heading to Olympics having MC 4x in a row but Sabbatini has a good history here if 3x Top 8 or better last 5 starts.Todd hasn’t been sharp. MC 4 of last 5 events and MC 4 of last 5 at this event. Not sure why but line went up to Todd -160. Bad sign?
Bets against Henley (1/2 Kokrak & 1/2 Zalatoris). Not a Henley fan. He shows up occasionally so who knows what happens this week but I just feel these 2 are better than Henley
Pereira -110 v Schwartzel. Now -120. Think you make money betting in Pereira every week. So here we go. He’s good
Macintyre -115 (now -120). Macintyre is a star . Live him and keep betting him. Making money. Scott hasn’t been sharp and as proof he needs a good tourney to make next weeK top 125.
Simpson -120 v Matsuyama. Actually like em both but how can you not go with Simpson who has finished Top 3 here each of the last 4 years and Top 6 in 6 of last 7x here and Top 11 8 of last 10x here!!
Gooch -110 v Van Rooyen. Gooch has come on making cuts his last 5 events none worse than 44th. Van Rooyen win a BS event last week against Korn Ferry class players and had a baby recently. I’m thinking he lived up to his commitment to play but is no good this week
0
Gutinstinctus
no good reason as Henley should be ok but I am not a Hugh Henley fan. I think Henley should be ok this week so wouldn’t be surprised if I lose. just think both Zalatoris and Kokrak are better
adding
Gooch -110 v Van Rooyen
so here is my abridged analysis in order but not necessarily how much I lime
Sabatini +125 v Todd
Sabbatini wasn’t good heading to Olympics having MC 4x in a row but Sabbatini has a good history here if 3x Top 8 or better last 5 starts.Todd hasn’t been sharp. MC 4 of last 5 events and MC 4 of last 5 at this event. Not sure why but line went up to Todd -160. Bad sign?
Bets against Henley (1/2 Kokrak & 1/2 Zalatoris). Not a Henley fan. He shows up occasionally so who knows what happens this week but I just feel these 2 are better than Henley
Pereira -110 v Schwartzel. Now -120. Think you make money betting in Pereira every week. So here we go. He’s good
Macintyre -115 (now -120). Macintyre is a star . Live him and keep betting him. Making money. Scott hasn’t been sharp and as proof he needs a good tourney to make next weeK top 125.
Simpson -120 v Matsuyama. Actually like em both but how can you not go with Simpson who has finished Top 3 here each of the last 4 years and Top 6 in 6 of last 7x here and Top 11 8 of last 10x here!!
Gooch -110 v Van Rooyen. Gooch has come on making cuts his last 5 events none worse than 44th. Van Rooyen win a BS event last week against Korn Ferry class players and had a baby recently. I’m thinking he lived up to his commitment to play but is no good this week
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.