Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
created a topic
I was forgotten in the penalty box - thanks you geniuses occupied and employed by Covers - so, I will respond from here to 14allall41's Super Bowl thread from the NFL Forum
in Penalty Box 14allall41 wrote: "Hey there. Long time no see. two weeks. We have some game to handicap. Let's get to the point and without sentiments and fear: 1. Bucs First Quarter Team Total: Over 5.5 2. Chiefs First Quarter Team Total: Under 6.5 3. Bucs +0.5 First Quarter 4. Time of the first score: Before 6 minutes 5. First Half Totals: Under 27.5 6. Bucs +3 7. Bucs ML Short explanations: 1. Brady has been 9 times in the Super Bowl first quarters. The only time his team scored was against the Eagles three Super Bowls ago. And those were the only 3 points scored in Brady's 9 first quarters combined. Why? Because he was quarterbacking the close to perfect team he could activate at any time and win or lose as he wanted to. He was in total control. I saw all those Super Bowls and I can tell you there is no one else who reads the defenses the way he does or manipulates them at his will. But, this is a new situation and he has Patrick Mahomes opposing him - the other new "Brady" that can win or lose at his will. Therefore Brady won't take chances here. He will be at full gear from the first snap. 2. Mahomes - the new "Brady" is quarterbacking the "new New England Patriots". Same mentality. See the above. 3. See the two above. 4. See above. 5. The line tells it all. It asks for under. 6. Reid wants to erase Belichicks legacy. Brady wants to prove he is the only cause the Pats won 6 Super Bowls in last 20 years. The goals of both are matching. What is losing one Super Bowl for Reid if he can prove with that the only reason the Pats won was Brady. So, Reid will be the greatest coach after winning five more Super Bowls or even more with Mahomes while like Michael Tal -one of the greatest chess masters - he will sacrifice one battle to win the war. Today is the battle he will throw and Brady will gratefully grab it. 7. See 6 BOL "
And I say: GL Since I can't even respond to my own thread. Unbelievable job Covers. Hooray. |
austrian | 4 |
|
|
created a topic
I was forgotten in the penalty box - thanks you geniuses occupied and employed by Covers - so, I will respond from here to 14allall41's Super Bowl thread from the NFL Forum
in Penalty Box
14allall41 wrote:
"Hey there. Long time no see. two weeks. We have some game to handicap.
Let's get to the point and without sentiments and fear:
1. Bucs First Quarter Team Total: Over 5.5
2. Chiefs First Quarter Team Total: Under 6.5
3. Bucs +0.5 First Quarter
4. Time of the first score: Before 6 minutes
5. First Half Totals: Under 27.5
6. Bucs +3
7. Bucs ML
Short explanations:
1. Brady has been 9 times in the Super Bowl first quarters. The only time his team scored was against the Eagles three Super Bowls ago. And those were the only 3 points scored in Brady's 9 first quarters combined. Why? Because he was quarterbacking the close to perfect team he could activate at any time and win or lose as he wanted to. He was in total control. I saw all those Super Bowls and I can tell you there is no one else who reads the defenses the way he does or manipulates them at his will. But, this is a new situation and he has Patrick Mahomes opposing him - the other new "Brady" that can win or lose at his will. Therefore Brady won't take chances here. He will be at full gear from the first snap.
2. Mahomes - the new "Brady" is quarterbacking the "new New England Patriots". Same mentality. See the above.
3. See the two above.
4. See above.
5. The line tells it all. It asks for under.
6. Reid wants to erase Belichicks legacy. Brady wants to prove he is the only cause the Pats won 6 Super Bowls in last 20 years. The goals of both are matching. What is losing one Super Bowl for Reid if he can prove with that the only reason the Pats won was Brady. So, Reid will be the greatest coach after winning five more Super Bowls or even more with Mahomes while like Michael Tal -one of the greatest chess masters - he will sacrifice one battle to win the war. Today is the battle he will throw and Brady will gratefully grab it.
7. See 6
BOL "
|
austrian | 2 |
|
|
replied to
LogCottage is the biggest no DickMOFO on covers. He just got therightthebright banned
in Penalty Box Quote Originally Posted by LogCottage:
Watch yourself. You’re hardly out of the woods...He was another of yours that you referred to as a “class act”. Watch myself? Really? What? Are you threatening me with something you miserable piece of shit? You have no idea |
austrian | 10 |
|
|
Why are you being so lenient with that miserable piece of crap? You want us to believe that therightthebright was someone elses alias? Someone who is not on covers for years just because he used same public domain avatar (which I do not recall seeing as all I remember was his first avatar saying Why Now and then one with MJ). Why are you so weak and meak listening to LogCottage who never posted a pick and never attracted any ausience while therightthebright was one of the most popular posters here in NFL playoffs? Why Weebs is not heard after he himself said LogCottage's claims were not true? Why covers is shooting its own legs by letting trolls like LogCottage thrive and great handicappers and really class acts like therightthebright be banned? Why? |
austrian | 2 |
|
|
created a topic
LogCottage is the biggest no DickMOFO on covers. He just got therightthebright banned
in Penalty Box Fuck you you fucking asshole for wronging that person for nothing but your short and invisible dick |
austrian | 10 |
|
|
I don't believe Covers. You banned thewrightthebright for what? Because LogCottage MOFO said he used some avatar that resembled someone elses avatar? I read the help forum and can't believe it. Phixer avatar? As much as I remember as anyone who was round that time Phixer was using Arnold Rothstein promo pic from Boardwalk Empire. That's a public domain. Are you guys crazy? thewrightthebright is banned? Best handicapper here? No wonder you chased away likes of him who were great handicappers. LogCottage you cocksucking motherfucker. You harmed so many people who were his grateful followers you bitch |
WrightTheBright | 37 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by kcblitzkrieg:
@austrian "The most successful handicapper this postseason 14-5 needs to have his thread bumped up." No, sorry that would be AMD... You're missing the point. Besides - 14-5 and 10-1 are not that far away. |
WrightTheBright | 111 |
|
|
Nice info -but this season is different than the others |
Bigballer | 12 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by carl42:
@austrian Just asking is all. Relax. It's a forum. Oh. I'm relaxed. But, once you voiced your opinion about my reaction to LogCottage - I expect you to do the same towards that person's bully behavior towards other members of covers and posters in the forums |
WrightTheBright | 111 |
|
|
@carl42 How did you come to that brilliant conclusion buddy? Just asking I'm not running from one thread to another, never posting any plays and only accusing people of being each other's aliases. And when LogCottage is in a really bad mood following his losses - than he goes accusing people of running binary scams. Binary scams???? Give me a break. Now he chose a new target - thewrightthebright. He implied in his post that the other dude - passenger - bumps up wthewrightthebrights thread... Like it needs to be bumped up. The most successful handicapper this postseason 14-5 needs to have his thread bumped up. That means he has aliases too? Ones that bump his threads up? Doesn't that sound ridiculous to you? For what purpose? Each playoff stage he created a dedicated thread: one for wild card games, one for the divisionals - and I expect him to create a new one for the conference finals. So, before opening "peacefully" delivering your biased reaction on my comment - why don't you address the phenomenon called LogCottage? Cause the way I see it he is the most bitter poster on Covers and anyone teaming up with him is exactly like him or him - judging by his own medicine |
WrightTheBright | 111 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by OneWhoKnows:
Are you posting this weekend Sir? Wait few minutes and LogCottage will accuse of being someone's alias. For him it is enough that you and the previous poster registered both in April 2013 to determine that you are both the same person. And, yeah, thewrightthebright followed you in month after on may 2013. So, it must be a world wide conspiracy running for almost 7 years now. Right Loggy? |
WrightTheBright | 111 |
|
|
All the little biatches using this thread to let their hidden punk characters out - those "protecting" me and those attacking me - you better stop. @LogCottage I wasn't the one who ratted you out and put you in the box - in case you're wondering. But, I gladly enjoyed seeing you there. Anyway - welcome back and hope you won't cause anymore trouble of the kind that put you there whatever that trouble might have been |
austrian | 78 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by saintsfan1977:
Quote Originally Posted by austrian: So, the Bucs won't be in the Super Bowl for an obvious reason the home teams do not reach the Super Bowl. The Chiefs won't win the Super Bowl for an obvious reason no team since 2004 Pats have won consecutive Super owls. The thing about no team hosting the Super Bowl ever getting there, might have something to do with the city. You had fans from all over the country spending money on merchandise, tickets etc. With Covid there are no fans or not as many so I don't believe we can apply the same rule as before. The Bucs could well get in but we'll see. Im just thinking out loud. I hear you and agree there is a possibility in absence of merchandising the game has changed. But, following the pattern since the NFL initiation - I don't see Goodell up to making any new moves |
austrian | 78 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals:
I'm wearing a Priest Holmes jersey around the house. Tomorrow. My Bucs #12 Dilfer Jersey! The true Bucs number 12 Youre a Cardinals fan walking with Bucs jersey? |
austrian | 78 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Frank the Bank:
Bills Bucs SB bank it If you so sure why don't you bet them both s outright winners. You can't lose with the current odds. Especially on the Bucs getting +420. The Bills are at +300. So, you cant lose |
austrian | 78 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet:
Quote Originally Posted by gutinstinctus: @austrian If u are still allowed to bet large sums at B365, you are not very good. Thats actually the worst argument u could give. what does this even mean??bet365 is well known as a square book,but is notorious for banning even small-time winners from all accounts i have read/heard.nobody that wins there is normally allowed to continue..but i cant speak for austrian obviously.he has his own experience that may differ. I'm not sure how nj.bet365 operates, but the one I have an account with - the regular Surray UK based bet365 is fine with me and my account. I'm not a high roller. My bets never exceed 500 euros. In outrights I'm betting "bet max" feature and it is usually up to 5000 euros. Never had a problem. But, I do remember that some dudes used to have problems there but I do not think that is because of the winning. |
austrian | 78 |
|
|
@StumpTownStu Quote Originally Posted by ThePassanger69:
You right. You're not an internet tough guy. No. You're just a clown. From an Opera going and Prussian History scholar you instantly became a Gun Collector from the age of (NEVERTHELESS) 12 Are you aware just how fucked up you sound? You're just making dick jokes, you're a village guy who travels the world and even has a favorite Opera in German language nevertheless. And, all at the same time you're handicapper, a gun collector and the dick rider by your own admission.... Now listen here PUNK... You are a dick and will always be one as long as you will try to belittle others so you can feel better about yourself. I pity you. Go get a real life punk Oh my..... Seems like you pissed the wrong guy Stu. Prepare to be had |
austrian | 78 |
|
|
@lancer89074 @Grunger1972 Thanks you both for being stand up guys. But, I can handle those weasels myself. First - those three clowns, CanadaCup, StumpTownStu and gutinstictus - they sure have a comprehension problems. I showcased two different approaches to handicapping this weekend games and tried to argue a point that both approaches bear the same fruits. But, those trolling hungry stooges chose to attack just like that. Out of respect to a sad event we all heard of - I will hold a day or two and then will pay with the same coin in those three stooges threads wherever they will be posting unless I see and hear the voice of reason. |
austrian | 78 |
|
|
RIP Lippsman. The kindest of the moderators. Hockey person really. |
Polar_Bear | 19 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
Austrian, people like you are the reason "the house always wins". I love the part about the best cappers "disregarding stats". That's good stuff. people like me have money made on betting and the last time I had to deposit into my bet365 online account was.... I don't remember. Years ago. What about you asswipe? |
austrian | 78 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.