Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
I don't normally post here, but so far, I've got a decent win loss. I'm giving a lot for Friday:
Indiana -5.5 Dallas -6.5 Parlays: Miami, Cleveland, Atlanta ML (3 play) Miami, Cleveland, Atlanta ML, with Indiana -5.5 and Dallas -6.5 (5 play) This will potentially be my biggest payoff this season. Good luck to us all.
|
bugrimmar | 1 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Shaner2003: anything under 2 minutes or in overtime can be reviewed bud, including basket interference called or not called. Why do you think the GSW coach was out on the court yelling to the refs for a review. And a those 5 fouls in a row in the 4th quarter change the entire game. Putting a team in the bonus with 9 minutes left changes how your team can play defense. Not only that, it put Lee in foul trouble, (5) I think there were three fouls called on him in like a minute in the fourth. Now he can't play as aggressive as he wants to, and neither can the whole team in fear of giving the spurs free opportunities to score. And we all know that a foul in general disrupts the pace for the GSW and also deflates any kind of momentum. Classic charge foul called on curry when it looked as though the GSW could start taking over in the 4th. The man was still moving, and curry slipt his shoulder. This had the crowd on their feet and could have swung the momentum over GSW way, nope, another foul called by the refs. Please dude, i've never complained about a fix before, this one was just obvious. All of your arguments are based on opinion, not facts. 1.) You can only review a call if there was a call in the first place. There was no call in the first place. Have you ever seen an instance wherein a call was manufactured when there was none? Never ever. 2.) The charge could have gone either way. Mills was outside the restricted area with his hands up, and on the replay, it looks like a charge to me. The refs are calling on a second that something happens. You can't blame them just because your opinion is different, especially since it was close. 3.) Stop complaining about fouls when the numbers clearly show that the free throw discrepancy isn't that big. 19-11 is something we see every day. Don't let your love for your Warriors or your lost money cloud your judgment. 4.) Look at the numbers and tell me if any of them can be doubted. Tell me, did the Warriors play well enough to win? No they did not. They sucked in that game and you know it.
|
bugrimmar | 14 |
|
|
Here are some notable game stats:
Warriors had 24 turnovers Spurs scored 31 points off turnovers Warriors had 9 fast break points Spurs had 23 fast break points Warriors shot 11 free throws Spurs shot 19 free throws -meaning there isn't much of a foul discrepancy. if anything, it just means that warriors don't play defense properly and spurs are well known for their defense (and we all know that). fouls = poor defense. Warriors were 8/31 (25%) from three point range Spurs were 11/27 (40%) from three point range None of these key stats could be influenced by the refs. These happened simply because the Warriors played badly, and the Spurs played great. Seriously, how can you blame the refs when Warriors are basically giving the ball away from stupid shot selection? It's not fair to blame the entire game on a tip in btw. It's extremely hard for referees to see things like that, which is why you only see offensive interference called very rarely. When's the last time you saw that call? It's very hard to make. AND YOU CAN'T REVIEW A PLAY IF THERE WASN'T A CALL IN THE FIRST PLACE. Anyway, please don't insult the intelligence of people by saying it's a fix just because your team sucked so bad. It was all their fault and they played like shit.
|
bugrimmar | 14 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Flush1: Reddick can shoot the ball , Griffin can now also . I agree with the pick Reddick can shoot the ball, one night in three. Griffin can shoot the ball, one night in five.
|
bugrimmar | 4 |
|
|
Got a 3-0 sweep yesterday with Ind, Was, and OKC. Today, this is what I've got:
Lal +13.5 - The Lakers don't suck, but they're being treated by bookers as pieces of meat that are to be fed to the Rockets. 13.5 is too much for Houston to go over. Mia -5.5 - The Clippers are overrated. That's how simple it is. The defending champions can easily cover 5 points against a team that doesn't have any reliable scoring options aside from Paul. Even if Bosh doesn't show up, this should be doable.
|
bugrimmar | 4 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Mazuka: My proposal of fix matches is directed to big players. People playing a few dollars please don’t clutter my mailbox. Today I have information game in NBA is fixed (Chicago Bulls - Indiana Pacers). If you are interested please contact me. Price for information – 330 USD (240 EUR). *I don't know when mod from covers forum block me again. No service which is sponsored by bookmakers don't like people who give fixed-games. ralf.bromer@aol.com Go to hell with your scam lol
|
bugrimmar | 3 |
|
|
Btw, I'm 5-2 YTD
|
bugrimmar | 3 |
|
|
Going for:
Ind -3 - Bulls are struggling on offense and Pacers have the best defense in the league. Was -2 - Teams surely have figured out by now the holes in 76ers game. They just surprised people at the start and their last loss showed how weak they are in reality. OKC -7 - Dallas is b2b, and OKC is 10-0 SU in their last 10 meetings.
|
bugrimmar | 3 |
|
|
Looking to open with Hou +5 @ lac. Seems like the safest bet, considering how overrated lac's line is. Hou is the better team, and with the spread, I'm pretty confident about the odds.
|
bugrimmar | 2 |
|
|
I'm the type who only bets on 1 thing every day. This year, I've made an account here for the first time to track my progress. So far, I'm 4-1 in the first NBA week:
Oct. 29 - lac @ lal +9.5 W Oct. 30 - mem @ sas -5 W Oct. 31 - ny @ chi -7.5 L Nov. 1 - tor @ atl -3.5 W Nov. 2 - -skip- Nov. 3 atl @ lal +2 W From today, I'll be posting my picks as well. Good luck to us all. :) |
bugrimmar | 2 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.