Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
9/5/2019 5 PM Thursday Season Opener.
|
byroncard | 2 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by MoPinkie:
congrats to Brady, Bellicheck, Edelman, and the Patriots. I'm a diehard Bears fan but man did the Patriots make me alot of money in the playoffs. Or I should say I made myself alot of money because I bet what "THEY" told me to bet and didnt need an explanation why..... ANYONE JUMP ON MY PLAY: EDELMAN SB MVY +2946 BOOM BABY. Nice hit on Edelman! |
MoPinkie | 14 |
|
|
Talk about a game of inches. O FUCK!!! INT! |
Gabbo | 308 |
|
|
The only trend that I saw that was 100% was....you don't fucking challenge a Hopkins sideline catch. 100% loss this year. |
byroncard | 1 |
|
|
LOL at Durant 2 feet out of bounds....play on. |
HungerforMoney | 13 |
|
|
When you are picking dogs and the spread doesn't come into play usually....could you play the moneyline for the dogs and the spread for the favorites? |
smacksmiter | 27 |
|
|
First off! Thank you for this post. Very informative. I'm in a weekly pickem league with some friends, not ATS, winners only. There are 24 of us. I have won a disproportionate, 4 weeks so far. I am 136-70. I have been wondering, if I was betting these ATS what would it look like. This gives me some idea. |
smacksmiter | 27 |
|
|
Don't they have to free kick it? |
Cooler999 | 34 |
|
|
Does anyone have any links to the latest going for 2 math? It was on the forums maybe a month ago. I need to reread this. Thanks. |
byroncard | 4 |
|
|
Bears then Chiefs. |
JetsFan37 | 19 |
|
|
Sorry! Meant Indy/OAK. Was watching NYG when I typed this out. |
byroncard | 3 |
|
|
I can't seem to figure out who wants to lose this game the most. Vegas Raiders are obviously in tank mode, trade 2/3 of their best players and headed to Vegas. Wouldn't be surprised for them to tank trying to move up the draft order. Indy is 2-5 - maybe luck still has something to prove? Thoughts? |
byroncard | 3 |
|
|
I'm looking forward to Minny/Rams on Thursday next week. |
Trump201603 | 5 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by ramboo:
I don't undertand when people say a game is 50/50 and decide then to just take the dog because they're plus money ... who cares if it's plus money if it doesn't win? Might be just me but that never made any sense to me .. Take a quick peak at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expected_value Long story short. In the long run all that really matter is having positive EV. Example if you were betting $100 on an actual 50/50 coin flip except you won $110 if you won and only lost $100 if you lost, you wouldn't have to work anymore if you could play the game as many times as you wanted. Since no one has a crystal ball, the goal is to put your money in well as many times as possible. |
NYBartender | 131 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by NYBartender:
Quote Originally Posted by byroncard: Definitely leaning the Sharks here myself. Just hard for me to back Martin Jones when, despite yesterday, he's had such a mediocre season overall and really bad numbers against Vegas. Knights def don't want to lose here on home ice and face an elimination game in San Jose. But who knows. I'm sticking with the over here, personally. Good luck with San Jose!Posted: less than a minute ago "Quote" Fluery has given up 11 goals in the last 3 games. He seems a little rattle to me since pitching 2 shutouts in a row to LA/SJ. I like the Sharks at + $ and the over. If you take out the 7-0 game, he has a ~1.5 GAA in his last 7 games, including 2 games that went to OT. He is actually playing pretty well. I think the side is a 50/50, but happy to take + $. |
NYBartender | 131 |
|
|
Fluery has given up 11 goals in the last 3 games. He seems a little rattle to me since pitching 2 shutouts in a row to LA/SJ. I like the Sharks at + $ and the over. |
NYBartender | 131 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by bpickin:
Posted: Apr. 26, 2018 - 8:20 PM ET "Quote" EXCUSE ME I MADE A MISTAKE. PLEASE FORGIVE ME...125-1 STANLEY CUP How much $$ do you have at 125-1? |
bpickin | 17 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by VGKfanaticfreak:
Posted: 3 minutes ago "Quote" Quote Originally Posted by skinnycat17: Posted: 4 minutes ago "Quote" Quote Originally Posted by VGKfanaticfreak: Posted: less than a minute ago "Quote" Damn no goal for the real deal!!! ROBBERY! No way, Neal pushed it in with his gloves lol I think that he actually hit it just below his glove on the shaft, but it is too hard to tell. I once scored a similar goal in hockey, but I know 100% it went off my stick. |
VGKfanaticfreak | 66 |
|
|
This is such a dominant thrashing. Sharks shots don't even seem like they have a chance to go in. |
VGKfanaticfreak | 66 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by skinnycat17:
Posted: 11 minutes ago "Quote" Thank-you... Just a heads up, you gotta have "thick skin" to post here. Sometimes, there is a lot of ribbing. Overall, they sure know their stuff... I first did read it as if you said it to me, but then reread it and thought you meant OP. |
JustWinBabyyx | 32 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.