![](https://images.covers.com/covers/emoticons/cool.gif)
![](https://images.covers.com/covers/emoticons/an_light.gif)
![](https://images.covers.com/covers/emoticons/smiley_3.gif)
does the big favs cover at this rate? the dogs is 100%
does the big favs cover at this rate? the dogs is 100%
First off! Thank you for this post. Very informative.
I'm in a weekly pickem league with some friends, not ATS, winners only. There are 24 of us. I have won a disproportionate, 4 weeks so far. I am 136-70. I have been wondering, if I was betting these ATS what would it look like. This gives me some idea.
First off! Thank you for this post. Very informative.
I'm in a weekly pickem league with some friends, not ATS, winners only. There are 24 of us. I have won a disproportionate, 4 weeks so far. I am 136-70. I have been wondering, if I was betting these ATS what would it look like. This gives me some idea.
When you are picking dogs and the spread doesn't come into play usually....could you play the moneyline for the dogs and the spread for the favorites?
When you are picking dogs and the spread doesn't come into play usually....could you play the moneyline for the dogs and the spread for the favorites?
When you are picking dogs and the spread doesn't come into play usually....could you play the moneyline for the dogs and the spread for the favorites?
When you are picking dogs and the spread doesn't come into play usually....could you play the moneyline for the dogs and the spread for the favorites?
None of it matters though....you still have to be on the right side. With possibility of a tie, you have less than a 50% chance of being right. That's great that the spread doesnt come into play most of the time, but you still got to pick the right side. The lesson here I think is money line betting. Fuck the spread, bet the ml dawgs!
None of it matters though....you still have to be on the right side. With possibility of a tie, you have less than a 50% chance of being right. That's great that the spread doesnt come into play most of the time, but you still got to pick the right side. The lesson here I think is money line betting. Fuck the spread, bet the ml dawgs!
Right on SMACKSMITER!!! DOGS CAN WIN GAMES TOO!!!
Right on SMACKSMITER!!! DOGS CAN WIN GAMES TOO!!!
They have to stay same or ahead of Rams both 11-2, so every game is a must win if they want trip to the Super Bowl to go through the SuperDome! Cam is not right, McCaffrey not enough to carry team. Cam has the Saints twice so give up on playoffs.
If you do play Panthers play the ML as points come in to play only one, two or three times a weekend so Saints cover or Panthers steal the game. Two games this past weekend the points made a difference KC -6.5 won by 3 lost ATS & LAC -13.5 won by 5 lost ATS. Steals like Miami, Oakland, Colts, Niners, Jets all won their games as dogs. Miami @ +9 and OAK @ +11.
My Live Dogs this weekend are LIONS JETS BROWNIES & BOTH BAY AREA TEAMS OAK & NINERS
They have to stay same or ahead of Rams both 11-2, so every game is a must win if they want trip to the Super Bowl to go through the SuperDome! Cam is not right, McCaffrey not enough to carry team. Cam has the Saints twice so give up on playoffs.
If you do play Panthers play the ML as points come in to play only one, two or three times a weekend so Saints cover or Panthers steal the game. Two games this past weekend the points made a difference KC -6.5 won by 3 lost ATS & LAC -13.5 won by 5 lost ATS. Steals like Miami, Oakland, Colts, Niners, Jets all won their games as dogs. Miami @ +9 and OAK @ +11.
My Live Dogs this weekend are LIONS JETS BROWNIES & BOTH BAY AREA TEAMS OAK & NINERS
I think it's also important to find out what RANGE the profitable moneyline (ml) plays were IF flat betting 1 unit and no more. Rationally thinking, I would think ml plays from the range of +200 through -400 would be "profitable." Anything ml higher than that, would involve a scenario of multiple wins being wiped out by a huge favorite loss, say for example, a -800 ml bet losing. They can and do happen. Also, some sports are more volatile than others. In my opinion, NHL, baseball and college basketball are very volatile and should be bet less or completely avoided whereas the NBA, NFL and college football are more consistent with pregame predictions.
It would be interesting if somebody did a mini-experiment on this with EACH American sport (NFL, NBA, NHL, College bball, college football, MLB, MLS but NOT international soccer. Sorry international soccer/"football" fans) and a small bankroll with 1 unit equating to $20. The results would be updated daily on a thread on each forum for everybody to see. Of course, there would also be more specific rules like how many games to bet per day and the types of bets that they can make. (Full game, 1st half, 2nd half, etc...)
I might have to do this next season with a $1k bankroll/$20 a unit side project...
I think it's also important to find out what RANGE the profitable moneyline (ml) plays were IF flat betting 1 unit and no more. Rationally thinking, I would think ml plays from the range of +200 through -400 would be "profitable." Anything ml higher than that, would involve a scenario of multiple wins being wiped out by a huge favorite loss, say for example, a -800 ml bet losing. They can and do happen. Also, some sports are more volatile than others. In my opinion, NHL, baseball and college basketball are very volatile and should be bet less or completely avoided whereas the NBA, NFL and college football are more consistent with pregame predictions.
It would be interesting if somebody did a mini-experiment on this with EACH American sport (NFL, NBA, NHL, College bball, college football, MLB, MLS but NOT international soccer. Sorry international soccer/"football" fans) and a small bankroll with 1 unit equating to $20. The results would be updated daily on a thread on each forum for everybody to see. Of course, there would also be more specific rules like how many games to bet per day and the types of bets that they can make. (Full game, 1st half, 2nd half, etc...)
I might have to do this next season with a $1k bankroll/$20 a unit side project...
They do come into play much more... You have to first look at rate underdogs win... if they win half, your 88% just became 75%... underdogs win less than half but you get the math... still, very very strong point by Smacks!!
They do come into play much more... You have to first look at rate underdogs win... if they win half, your 88% just became 75%... underdogs win less than half but you get the math... still, very very strong point by Smacks!!
Going back to 1989, regular season games only.....
Favorites have a record of 4841-2347-12, winning straight up 67.3% of the time.
The favorites have an against the spread record of 3445-3556-199, covering 49.2% of the time with an average line of -5.6.
So betting a favorite, you would not have won (you either lost or tied) 27% of the time when the favorite won the game outright.
This obviously means that a favorite that wins the game outright covers 73% of the time.
Going back to 1989, regular season games only.....
Favorites have a record of 4841-2347-12, winning straight up 67.3% of the time.
The favorites have an against the spread record of 3445-3556-199, covering 49.2% of the time with an average line of -5.6.
So betting a favorite, you would not have won (you either lost or tied) 27% of the time when the favorite won the game outright.
This obviously means that a favorite that wins the game outright covers 73% of the time.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.