Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Anytime TD scorer - George Pickens +225. 1 unit |
C-70Blues | 1 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Ih8coldweather:
Eagles aren’t beating the Lions You also 'thought' the Jets we're going to win the Super Bowl... |
C-70Blues | 10 |
|
|
Who said anything about Detroit hosting the conference championship??? |
C-70Blues | 10 |
|
|
The Browns are 8-0 at home on TNF s/'09. During the regular season, the home team in the Steelers/Browns series is 12-2-1 SU L15 games. Browns are 6-2 ATS following a loss by 21 points or more under Stefanski. |
begginerboy | 22 |
|
|
Bills vs. Eagles +1800. 10 units |
C-70Blues | 10 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by C-70Blues:
Quote Originally Posted by Ih8coldweather: @BallingLikeNE Exactly this. This is the handicap. Stefanski off extended rest, with a health O-line finally, and a defense where everyone is healthy. Revenge spot for Jamies going up against his old team, which should be flat in game #2 after a big divisional win. Normally bad teams coming off a bye in week 11 are 7-10 point dogs, not 1 point road favorites. Notice when I mentioned this. |
vanzack | 187 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by CravinMorehead:
@C-70Blues Get outta here punk! Your breath stinks Why don't you let vanzack speak for himself? |
vanzack | 187 |
|
|
And I went back and looked at all your future wagers that won't cash. The number is really bad. My favorite predictions were the Browns and Panthers to win their divisions. |
Ih8coldweather | 17 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by C-70Blues:
Quote Originally Posted by Ih8coldweather: Cleveland Browns @ NO Saints The Browns are coming off of a bye which means that Stefanski has extra time to prepare for this NO team which is a good let down spot of a divisional win against Atlanta. I think they will be flat here. The Browns are completely HEALTHY for the first time all year. They have their entire O-line intact which I would argue is a top 5 O-line when healthy (Lions, Eagles, Browns, Colts, Cowboys) and their defense is also healthy. I can't say the same about the Saints who are depleted at WR, and have some injuries on the offensive line with guys banged up. Jamies is also in a revenge spot playing against his old team that let him go, I think he will come out extra motived. As long as he can take care of the ball I see this being a competitive game but I really like the Browns in this spot. Also, the Browns are top 5 in pressure rating this year. Who is horrible against the pass rush? Derek Carr. Myles Garrett will be going up against a rookie tackle... Gimme the Browns. Less thinking. More quantifying. Have you noticed you have so much to say before the game starts and then nothing after? Trust me, it's much better talking after the fact. Remember, don't take really bad teams off a bye if their favored, regardless of what you think.
|
Ih8coldweather | 17 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:
NO BET TONIGHT ON MNF TEXANS / COWBOYS GL to all Since you're not on the monday night game, that's 11 losing weeks in a row. Is it still due to statistical unluckiness? |
vanzack | 187 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Ih8coldweather:
Cleveland Browns @ NO Saints The Browns are coming off of a bye which means that Stefanski has extra time to prepare for this NO team which is a good let down spot of a divisional win against Atlanta. I think they will be flat here. The Browns are completely HEALTHY for the first time all year. They have their entire O-line intact which I would argue is a top 5 O-line when healthy (Lions, Eagles, Browns, Colts, Cowboys) and their defense is also healthy. I can't say the same about the Saints who are depleted at WR, and have some injuries on the offensive line with guys banged up. Jamies is also in a revenge spot playing against his old team that let him go, I think he will come out extra motived. As long as he can take care of the ball I see this being a competitive game but I really like the Browns in this spot. Also, the Browns are top 5 in pressure rating this year. Who is horrible against the pass rush? Derek Carr. Myles Garrett will be going up against a rookie tackle... Gimme the Browns. Less thinking. More quantifying. |
Ih8coldweather | 17 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Rush51:
Quote Originally Posted by paperprophets: Wtf happened to Cleveland? They are Cleveland. Don't you know ? I had to look at Deshaun's box score and was shocked it wasn't him. Who knew ?? Didn't they have a stud defense ? It's a different excuse w these cast of characters every week. Part of smart handicapping is staying away from bad teams no matter the points you are getting ( i. e. They are blackballed from consideration; bet against only). Incorporate this. Most of the bottom feeders ATS have shitty QBs. I said the same thing in a different way. Bad teams that suck before the bye usually suck after it. |
vanzack | 187 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by paperprophets:
Wtf happened to Cleveland? They've sucked all year. What's the confusion? |
vanzack | 187 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by bunny651:
Quote Originally Posted by C-70Blues: You seem to have all the answers except for posting winners. Since you and IH8 both agree on Cleveland I'm putting a little something on the Saints. If you place a bet only based on certain people are on the other side, you are not what you portray yourself to be-- just want to talk football, try to understand his reasoning...ETC. Well, go ahead and spin that, too. After I saw IH8's writeup how could I not? |
vanzack | 187 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Ih8coldweather:
@BallingLikeNE Exactly this. This is the handicap. Stefanski off extended rest, with a health O-line finally, and a defense where everyone is healthy. Revenge spot for Jamies going up against his old team, which should be flat in game #2 after a big divisional win. The issue is you're assuming the Browns are in a good place coming off a bye. |
vanzack | 187 |
|
|
You seem to have all the answers except for posting winners. Since you and IH8 both agree on Cleveland I'm putting a little something on the Saints.
|
vanzack | 187 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:
@C-70Blues This is what I mean about living in different universes. I am talking about statistical "luck". Variance. Call it what you want. I dont believe in luck in the traditional sense. The comment that I made that you are obsessed about is that I have been statistically unlucky this season - and that is a fact. Maybe you and the other moron twin should get together and share notes. So much for heading in the right direction... |
vanzack | 187 |
|
|
Bumped for IH8. |
C-70Blues | 5 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Ih8coldweather:
Dude you’re a clown. You have so much time, go back, figure my record out, post it, and figure out the record and units in I’m up or down. I was down bad the first few weeks and just had a 60+ unit week. I don’t need to discuss my finances or day job with you but I do every well in my career, so believe it or not my entire life doesn’t revolve around sports betting. So go figure out my record and units and post it since you have nothing better to do. Thanks. I went back to all your predictions and bets BEFORE week one and holy crap, you are way, way down. You put way, way too many bets on the Jets and Jets players. |
Ih8coldweather | 28 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Ih8coldweather:
@C-70Blues Have you posted a single play? interested to see what if anything is in this “book” I posted a prop play when the Steelers faced the Giants on MNF in week 8. |
vanzack | 187 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.