Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by SexyChoc:
I don't know -- With the Refs protecting Mahomes and throwing flags for PI and Personal Fouls against the Bills all game long, KC wins by 3 Who says Mahomes finishes the game? |
Interstellar | 30 |
|
|
replied to
The last time a team went for a 3-peat and hosted the conference finals, this happened.
in NFL Betting Quote Originally Posted by C-70Blues:
Montana was never the starter for the 49ers again. Oddly enough he went to Kansas City. Does the same thing happen to Mahomes on Sunday? 1990 NFCCG - Joe Montana Hit Scroll the video back to the beginning. |
C-70Blues | 5 |
|
|
replied to
The last time a team went for a 3-peat and hosted the conference finals, this happened.
in NFL Betting That was removed quickly. Nice job covers. |
C-70Blues | 5 |
|
|
replied to
The last time a team went for a 3-peat and hosted the conference finals, this happened.
in NFL Betting Quote Originally Posted by Galcott:
I invite you to visit my website: againstbookmakers.com Today, I’m celebrating my 10th wedding anniversary with the most amazing woman in the world. I’ve decided to make today’s promotion truly special, especially since it’s the last one before Valentine’s Day. To celebrate our anniversary, anyone who sends us their wishes at againstbookmakers@gmail.com will have the chance to purchase a 1000-fix package for $2000 or 500 fixes for $1000. This is truly a once-in-a-lifetime offer! I’m sure many of you will appreciate the opportunity to earn big money with this promotion. I’ve often shared my fixes for free, so those who know me will recognize this as a generous gesture. Don’t waste the opportunity! Who is this ass hat? |
C-70Blues | 5 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Interstellar:
The chiefs were 11-6 last year and won on the road in the playoffs. Now this year at 15-2, they have home field, well rested after the bills had a war, you think they’re going to lose? If the bills were home this is a different story. Chiefs ML IMO They did not look like a 'well rested' team last week against the Texans. |
Interstellar | 30 |
|
|
All the games, some of them against very bad teams, that were decided on the last play comes back to bite them in the ass. |
Interstellar | 30 |
|
|
Right now the Bills are clearly better than the Chiefs, regardless of what KC has done in the past. If the Bills show up and play they way they have been playing all season, they win. They have already beat the AFC team that finished second in the NFL in defensive yards allowed per play (Broncos) AND the team who finished first in offensive yards per play (Ravens). Last week the Chiefs looked like a tired team, and that was after a week off. They had 212 yards of offense, the lowest in any game Mahomes has started and the third worst output with Reid as head coach. This is not the Chiefs team that has won in the past. |
C-70Blues | 70 |
|
|
created a topic
The last time a team went for a 3-peat and hosted the conference finals, this happened.
in NFL Betting Montana was never the starter for the 49ers again. Oddly enough he went to Kansas City. Does the same thing happen to Mahomes on Sunday? |
C-70Blues | 5 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:
@C-70Blues Awesome, I can't wait for the info. I'm sure it'll be truly ground breaking. You see as for me, all I know is punting stats. My whole life I've only known espn, and it's the only way for me to handicap games. It's about time we got a poster over here that knows the real stuff. Thank you It won't be anything ground breaking. It will be common sense based on historical playoff results. Also, why did the punting stat choose those 4 quarterbacks? |
GMoneyGTown | 28 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:
Jayden Daniels in one year, as a rookie, has more games with zero punts and zero interceptions than Joe Montana, Tom Brady, Peyton Manning and Patrick Mahomes, COMBINED. Yea I'll take him plus the points and ML. With his VR goggles and Kingsbury calling plays. Vs Sirianni and a gimpy Jalen Hurts. Where exactly did you pick that stat up? |
GMoneyGTown | 28 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by C-70Blues:
Baltimore is not a super bowl team. They always do well during the regular season but once it comes to the playoffs, Baltimore shows their true colors. |
C-70Blues | 70 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by C-70Blues:
Who said anything about Detroit hosting the conference championship??? |
C-70Blues | 70 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:
Quote Originally Posted by C-70Blues: Let's come from a different angle regarding your 'punting' stat. Joe Montana, Tom Brady, Peyton Manning and Patrick Mahomes won 16 Super Bowls COMBINED but didn't qualify for your punting stat. You've been tooting your horn a lot around here. lately. There isn't a thread in the nfl forum where you don't show up, you must do really well at betting. But, you missed the point entirely. Jayden Daniels is a rookie. As bettors, we bet on future outcomes. Things that haven't been done yet. So yes I'll take a shot on him here getting points I didn't miss the point at all. Once we get closer to Sunday I will be posting, in my super bowl participant thread, what Washington and Buffalo need to do if they want to win their games and I won't be bringing up that punting stat. |
GMoneyGTown | 28 |
|
|
Let's come from a different angle regarding your 'punting' stat. Joe Montana, Tom Brady, Peyton Manning and Patrick Mahomes won 16 Super Bowls COMBINED but didn't qualify for your punting stat. |
GMoneyGTown | 28 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:
Jayden Daniels in one year, as a rookie, has more games with zero punts and zero interceptions than Joe Montana, Tom Brady, Peyton Manning and Patrick Mahomes, COMBINED. Yea I'll take him plus the points and ML. With his VR goggles and Kingsbury calling plays. Vs Sirianni and a gimpy Jalen Hurts.
So you're saying that is some kind of parameter to measure Daniels to those 4 quarterbacks? Sounds like a 'stat' you heard on ESPN. |
GMoneyGTown | 28 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by GMoneyGTown:
@EastsideBangers LOL, too bad with these written forums, one cannot detect the sarcasm or humor one tries to convey in the message. As someone else pointed out, i was trying to be funny and sarcastic but may have failed in my attempt. I am a Skins fan so excuse us having been through 10 or more years of futility, being made fun of (rightfully) and be the laughing stock of many NFL fans if this year we are a bit over the top )) But yeah, not emotional just trying to be funny. @LGG79 You get it....i am a tongue in cheek type when writing in my posts here more often than not. I forgot about that that stat or what someone said about playing a game after Detroit, was it Detroit, how they were so physical? I don't think that game against Skins was that physical or at least Skins didn't come out with too many injuries other than our center which is a bad one for the offense. I don't think you we're being sarcastic or humorous. If you we're trying to be funny why are you doing it here? What does your nonsense have to with betting on the NFL??? |
GMoneyGTown | 28 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by GMoneyGTown:
@Battalion74 I thought Detroit has been the best team all the year....and what happened when they played the Skins. To be honest Eagles-Skins game this weekend reminds of Detroit-Skins game last week. You thought wrong fan. |
GMoneyGTown | 33 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by GMoneyGTown:
@C-70Blues Nope, can't coach a team but can answer some of your sarcastic comments. @C-70Blues You obviously didn't watch the Redskins-Detroit game last week or you don't understand the stats....Detroit's Gibbs had 14 rushes for 105 yards with a long run of 33 yards. Therefore take that long run away he had 13 rush attempts for 72 yards for an average of 5.5 yards an attempt. Montgomery their other RB had 7 attempts for 28 yards or 4 yards a rush. Williams was the other guy who had a reverse run for a TD which again skewered the stat you are quoting last week. Did i say we will shut down Saquon or did i say we stand a better chance if we stack the box in an attempt to limit his success. Don't want to continue this back and forth with you, you are entitled to your opinion....i am sure there are many who bet Tampa Bay Bucs and Detroit Lions quoting the stats you have against the Skins, the same people who will be betting the Eagles this weekend. F*ckin' fans! |
GMoneyGTown | 33 |
|
|
Washington's rush defense during the regular season allowed 4.8 yards per rush, 29th in the league. Last week they allowed 8.7 yards per rush against the Lions. This is the defense that will absolutely shut down Saquon Barkley??? |
GMoneyGTown | 33 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by GMoneyGTown:
@C-70Blues I am here on a betting forum cause like you I presume you like to gamble and i presume you don't watch every Redskins game and play like i do through the year so perhaps i would give you some insight. And hence why I started off saying that, give you my reasoning and then tell you why I don't think Philly -4.5 is a good bet. At least, I tell you why i like something rather than some people here on come on and say they like something without any reasoning or justification and people jump on them cause they see some posting of a record which no one can confirm. LOL....LOL.... Feel free to ignore that I am a Redskins fan and go right ahead and bet Philly -4.5 sir.
You are full off assumptions and presumptions aren't you? You probably assume you could coach an NFL team with your 'stack the box' philosophy. |
GMoneyGTown | 33 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.