Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
all 5 6pm games went Over. Had a couple on parlays. |
capdatazz | 7 |
|
|
@NavyDog Good points. Memphis @ 57 looks most enticing. Phoenix at 55.5 is a lean also. |
capdatazz | 7 |
|
|
Celtics, Brooklyn and Memphis games are early targets. The first 2 should be 57 and Memphis 59. |
capdatazz | 7 |
|
|
7 of 10 games went over on Monday and all 3 on Tues. Seems like an easy trend and is hitting often due to the style many teams are embracing. |
capdatazz | 7 |
|
|
I trailed on all these except the O's, your easiest win. Thanks for posting man, these were A+! |
mw_caps | 11 |
|
|
I really liked these, trailed on all but O's doh! |
mw_caps | 11 |
|
|
I've been playing a lot of in game totals. By waiting a couple innings you can get 5.5 if no score. |
sportswagers | 18 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:
Lucky? Here's two that might need some...Rangers ML(+212) *1/2.12Rangers TT OVER 3.5(+115) *1/1.15Sampson/Price listedOne of these pops, maybe both? GL I like this and trailed on the TT. Easiest bet of my life |
undermysac | 29 |
|
|
Great start! Love the Totals players |
pipedoctor | 9 |
|
|
This is looking good. Missed it, but great job breaking it down |
StraightWagers | 23 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by satchmo76:
and if you had in-game betting you were able to get a much better line...167.5 for me
Yep, love those "wrong" lines. |
mikeru3 | 20 |
|
|
Clippers are a good team. They're winning and playing very hard. Portland is tough but Clips are rolling and at home. |
Okladood | 10 |
|
|
Llana and Bob are the 2 biggest fukTards on covers.
|
Tomkopec | 27 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Jailbait7127: thanks guys i do not see warriors winning back to back .. this is the nba cavs +8.5 next game looks real nice as well........ good luck everyone Ugh, not your starting to sound like those retards llana and bob who talked sh.it in your thread. The Knicks.. I mean Cavs are seriously overmatched. Its a miracle they won 2 games this series.
|
Jailbait7127 | 14 |
|
|
All the calls going to GSW - big turnaround
|
mikeru3 | 34 |
|
|
Nice start. Rooting for the underdog here.
The better team doesn't always win, this sure looks like a prime example.
|
mikeru3 | 34 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by LIanafranks5: No way the league will risk cavs losing this series. If it gets tied 2-2 it would be tough for the cavs to come back and win Just like they wouldn't "risk" Clippers losing or Houston losing? For someone who gets it wrong so often you still have a lot of confidence in your conspiracy theories.
|
agutierrez129 | 6 |
|
|
A bet on either side is a shot in the dark. If GSW play up to even 75% of their ability they can't lose.
James is a force of nature that wills his team to play better then they are. Its pretty incredible to see this guy take a bunch of Knicks players and have them compete against an 11-deep squad of ballers.
|
mikeru3 | 17 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by RodWoman: All you have to do is explain how it's done. I've askled many times, and no one has answered, let alone come up with a reasonable explanation. Please, please tell us how Las Vegas controls Curry, Thompson, James, Delly, Smith, Green, Mozgov, Bogut. How does it happen? As lanafranks says 'I don't know how but it just does'. Then provides anecdotal evidence from past games that 'proves' her point. Similar to how religious fanatics point the Bible or Quoran to explain everything. Their reasoning is based solely on ideology - it makes them feel good believing things don't 'just happen', that everything has some fixed outcome controlled by a 'destiny' or God. That's how these kooks think. Facts: - Vegas casinos sportsbetting accounts for only 2% of revenue. - Books make their money off the 10% juice and higher profit margins from teasers/parlays Phixer's had a nice stretch in the playoffs and I applaud him and all those who have followed. The logic is pretty nuts, but whatever helps make you pick the right side is all that matters. As for Phixer's $350 Bill claim, here is a 2010 white paper that states online gambling was only $30 Bill in revenue - and doesn't detail what percentage of that was on just sports. https://www.americangaming.org/sites/default/files/uploads/docs/whitepapers/final_online_gambling_white_paper_5-18-11.pdf |
phixer | 189 |
|
|
Looking good. The 'TV' angle logic doesn't make sense since the networks have already paid the league for however many games end up being played.
And you didn't fall into the 'anti-public' play. But your chances to win are 50% on any individual play. Since you've already won 7 in a row, this doesn't get factored in. Of course if you were starting from game 1 trying to win 8 straight, the chances are way less.
|
phixer | 1191 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.