Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
[Quote: Originally Posted by C-70Blues]Quote Originally Posted by undermysac: Jayden Daniels in one year, as a rookie, has more games with zero punts and zero interceptions than Joe Montana, Tom Brady, Peyton Manning and Patrick Mahomes, COMBINED. Yea I'll take him plus the points and ML. With his VR goggles and Kingsbury calling plays. Vs Sirianni and a gimpy Jalen Hurts. Where exactly did you pick that stat up?[/Quote] Puntingstats.com |
GMoneyGTown | 30 |
|
|
Awfully quiet in here... |
undermysac | 29 |
|
|
@C-70Blues Awesome, I can't wait for the info. I'm sure it'll be truly ground breaking. You see as for me, all I know is punting stats. My whole life I've only known espn, and it's the only way for me to handicap games. It's about time we got a poster over here that knows the real stuff. Thank you |
GMoneyGTown | 30 |
|
|
Good Luck |
Buffalobob89074 | 21 |
|
|
@JOHNNY_ODAE Good to see you doing well |
undermysac | 29 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by LarryJone45:
@justliketoplay They would still be dogs if the beat the eagles 30-10 hypothetical line which is currently 4.5 would move to +3.5 IMO This. That's how books do it. A slight adjustment from the previous week's results. Then they let bettors move the line. |
justliketoplay | 30 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by C-70Blues:
Let's come from a different angle regarding your 'punting' stat. Joe Montana, Tom Brady, Peyton Manning and Patrick Mahomes won 16 Super Bowls COMBINED but didn't qualify for your punting stat. You've been tooting your horn a lot around here. lately. There isn't a thread in the nfl forum where you don't show up, you must do really well at betting. But, you missed the point entirely. Jayden Daniels is a rookie. As bettors, we bet on future outcomes. Things that haven't been done yet. So yes I'll take a shot on him here getting points |
GMoneyGTown | 30 |
|
|
Jayden Daniels in one year, as a rookie, has more games with zero punts and zero interceptions than Joe Montana, Tom Brady, Peyton Manning and Patrick Mahomes, COMBINED. Yea I'll take him plus the points and ML. With his VR goggles and Kingsbury calling plays. Vs Sirianni and a gimpy Jalen Hurts. |
GMoneyGTown | 30 |
|
|
@Rush51 Also, there's no way of knowing if a guy is capable of motivating a team or not until it happens, or doesn't. He will have to lead and change the culture as you said. Fwiw, he stood in the same room, practice field, and game field alongside Dan Campbell for 3 years. If he didn't saturate any of that part of the game from him, I'd be damned |
Rush51 | 17 |
|
|
Rush51 | 17 |
|
||
Quote Originally Posted by Rush51:
I don't think he is the right guy at all to try and change the culture of this team. He has "never" been a head coach at any level of football, and to me that means something. Running an offense and the creativity that comes with it is one thing, "leading" the guys day in and day out, being that motivational person, and changing the culture of a team is quite another. (Kirk Herbstreit did a recent interview, and expressed almost the exact same concerns w/ B. Johnson) I want to know CHI what happened with the interview(s) with Pete Carroll. He expressed interest in getting back into coaching, and he seemed to be the exact type of coach that CHI needs right now,... one that has HC experience... and a lot of it. Carroll is a rah rah type of guy, and is a clear leader. The jury is still out if Ben Johnson is that type of person, or can/will develop into one. The other part that makes Carroll really special is his talent at developing QB. He and his offensive coaching staff did a phenomenal job developing QBs at USC. Caleb Williams, interestingly enough from USC, is still a project and his skills need honing with the right teacher at CHI. I'm not a Bears fan (or hater), but I do like to see the right people in place to help turnaround a franchise.... He may, or he may not. There are a lot of guys in the league who were never head coaches before becoming head coaches. Andy Reid, Shanahan, Lafleur, Sirriani, Mcdermot, Mcvay, and O'Connell were all coordinators before becoming HC's. What if they never got a chance at it? There's no way to really know. Hiring guys like this with a higher ceiling has proven better success than going with a re-tread HC. |
Rush51 | 17 |
|
|
The Bears had to make this hire. He kind of just fell in their lap, they're rather lucky. They had no plans of firing a Waldron and Eberflus when the season started. They'd be onto another complete rebuild if Ben Johnson didn't get this job. Caleb Williams has 2 more years on his rookie contract, and this guy has the only real shot in making him work out imo. Also, if they do indeed get Dennis Allen as DC(reports say it's most likely), they all ready have the pieces in place for him to run his 4-3. If any players had any notions of leaving this team before, I think that this hire will change their minds. |
Rush51 | 17 |
|
|
@kcblitzkrieg Well I'll have to watch that game again then, maybe my eye test failed me. If Taylor had his best rated game of the year, how good was it? Perhaps the bar isn't that high since he's been so bad all year. Mahomes was sacked 3 times, and only had 162 yards passing. The run game was nearly non existent getting 2.3 yards per rush. Jawan Taylor had one penalty for a false start. This is an upgrade for him since he's usually committing multiple penalties per game. Good points about the Bills D line, they aren't as good as the Texans. But they're built differently, smaller but speedy, and they like being in the Nickel. The Bills defense is one where you want to get the run game going against, it's the best way to attack them. |
undermysac | 29 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by ActionMagnet:
BILLS vs CHIEFS for the Lombardi this Sunday. I reluctantly bet KC -1 last night because it's tough to beat KC and the officials on the road. They will get every fucking call again, when needed. The NFC is a disaster. Either team will get slaughtered in the big game. |
ActionMagnet | 21 |
|
|
Bears signing Ben Johnson as new HC. Reportedly Dennis Allen will be the DC. |
undermysac | 29 |
|
|
replied to
Question: honestly do you think Mahomes and the Chiefs Get Favored Treatment by the Refs
in NFL Betting The questionable roughing the passer and unnecessary roughness calls on Mahomes are one thing. What gets me the most is when you see all the other qb's in the league get blasted to oblivion and there aren't any flags. Call it the same for the position, not the name on the jersey. |
GMoneyGTown | 55 |
|
|
Turnovers determined the who lost in every playoff game so far except the Texans. Turnovers are mistakes, so yes you are correct. |
C-70Blues | 20 |
|
|
85-89-10 (+1.21) YTD 7-6-1 (+0.62) PLAYOFFS 2-4-1 (-1.34) LAST WEEK
Commanders +5.5(-108) *1.00/.93 I think it still goes up slightly until injury reports round out. Bovada hit +6-120 for a little bit. Gonna play this line just how I did the Rams. Patience for now. |
undermysac | 29 |
|
|
For the record, if the Eagles and Chiefs make it to the SB for a 2023 rematch I think it will suck. For me at least. There's no other 2 teams that I didn't want to make the SB as bad as these 2. Gimme Josh Allen vs Jayden Daniels, I think that would be awesome. |
undermysac | 29 |
|
|
Only 2 games left, this will be short n sweet. Commanders @ Eagles -5.5 (48) Round 3 between nfc east divisional foes. The Eagles have the better O and D lines, and overall better roster top to bottom. Hence their better power rankings. Saquon is a unicorn. I just have to say that the Commanders have the better QB, albeit a rookie. And a slight edge to Dan Quinn over Sirianni. I most definitely think that Kingsbury is the better OC over Kellen Moore. If you haven't noticed, the Commanders have won 7 games in a row. The Eagles have won 4 in a row, with their last loss vs the Commanders. As a matter of fact, the Eagles haven't lost any other game since week 4 going 14-1. The Commanders get a one day rest advantage. The Eagles are banged up including Hurts. There's only one bet to make for me, I'll be on the Commanders. I will understand anyone who backs the Eagles though, they have proven to be a solid team this year. Bills @ Chiefs -2 (48) The Billls are the better team. The thing is that the Chiefs have played many teams this year who have been better than them, and still won. A lot of the time it doesn't make sense. The thing with the refs is getting ridiculous. We watch week after week every other QB getting laid out with no penalties. If someone sneezes on Mahomes it's 15 yards. The Chiefs continue to win with absolutely awful play from their offensive tackles. No other teams are successful with bad offensive tackles. The Chiefs win. I could talk about this game from x's and o's to stats and analytics for hours. It would lead me to a Bills +2 and ML bet any which way. I don't want any part of this game. Good Luck guys |
undermysac | 29 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.