Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Bulls #2 player, Luol Deng, has some affiliation with the UK. |
Paul19 | 10 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Paul19: What team should i support and why? Im from the UK so locality doesnt mean anything, i did want to support the Raptors as i like dinosaurs but they are Canadian and i want to support a US team (not that there is anything wrong Canada) LOL, "because you like dinosaurs." I would go with the Bulls or Thunder.. the Heat if you like rooting for the evil empire/bad guys. Two of these 3 teams are likely to be in the finals.
|
Paul19 | 10 |
|
|
Remember to be conscious of halftime hedges on these plays. Hedging is part of bankroll management, and an integral part of risk management. Hedging sells part of the risk associated with your play for a chance of hitting a middle to cash both your original and hedge bet.
|
capperintuition | 44 |
|
|
Good analysis, best of luck.
|
si1ly | 28 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by bigDe1002003: In regards to the Cleveland game, everything you stated makes plenty of sense; however, in this particular situation, do you not feel that the urgency level of Boston is much higher now that they are past the All star break? Also, they were able to practice more over the break, which is something they really needed as a team. Bass and Wilcox also practiced. I don't think O'Neill joined the team for practice though. I agree that earlier in the year when they played dallas (1/11/12) after 4 straight days of no games, they should've been "rested", but that last time they were originally out of shape and doc rivers made them do conditioning during their days off. So, their very next game they were sore and exhausted. This time around, the celts players are in game shape and they had ample time to practice together, which they didn't really have much of before. Also, Rondo and Pierce stated over the break that their team was lacking offensive and defensive discipline and they planned to work on that during the break. Anyways, I completely agree with you on much of what you said because the fact of the matter is the Cavs are competitive enough to be favorites in most of their home games. But, the Celtics are a veteran team that is actually rested this game, lol (first time all year). Also, do you think the "look ahead angle" matters for Cavs? Boy, that's a lot of unquantifiable analysis. Cleveland has one of the best 1-2 punches at PG in the league with Irving and Sessions. They are a surprisingly deep young team with guys like Thompson and Gee trying to prove themselves as everyday players. The Cavs are not a team that is going to look past anybody because their goal is improvement, not a deep playoff run (although that would be a nice bonus.) As you said, the Celtics have a sense of urgency that borders on desperation. This is an old team who's championship window narrows every day. They don't have the luxury of playing day-by-day with an aim on improving. Boston against an dog on the first leg of a b2b will always be a look-ahead/save your legs game but Cleveland is looking to get this win so they can play with house money in New York tomorrow. |
capperintuition | 44 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by mlesnet: Which one of the 3 picks is your favorite? It's a tough call between the Hornets and the Cavs. Hornets hold the better ATS edge, but I don't think the Cavs will have much issue winning this home game. |
capperintuition | 44 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Stew Baker: So being a home non-dog, you would need a 4 1/2 pt. edge for Sacramento to be playable, making them a play at -1/2 (which in reality is pick)? Similarly, being a road dog, you would need a 4 1/2 pt. edge for Washington, making them a play at +8 1/2? Everything must be 5-points to elicit a play, except for home dogs. home teams and underdogs have been shown to be undervalued by ~2% each, so there is enough implicit value to tip the scales. Home favs and road dogs do not hold additional implicit value, so they must have a 5-point ATS edge. |
capperintuition | 44 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by capperintuition: You must be new to my threads if you think there tic-tack injuries hold any weight. Varejao is the only injured play we have mentioned that hold any real weight for his team, but he has been gone for long enough that his injury is accurately accounted for in this line. Wilcox is a net -2.7 (+/-), O'Neal is a net -5.3 (+/-) and Bass just barely contributes positively for the Celtics at +1.2.. The injuries are absolutely negligible in this match-up. Just so the injury mavens out there don't think I am speaking blasphemy. When I say that the injuries are negligible it means that there is no market edge to be gained by factoring these injuries. Of course the injuries will affect the game, but Vegas is dialed-in on their assessment of the injuries in this game because they are run-of-the-mill and Varejao has been out long enough for them to quantify the line adjustment, which is still very small. If anything, Varejao's injury still ever so slightly pays to the Cavs ATS value because people like you are still lingering over an injury that occurred 7 games ago. For that reason, Vegas may need to inflate the line a bit because of the irrational Boston money basing the play on an old injury that has been properly quantified. |
capperintuition | 44 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by 308655406: Wilcox will play, and Bass is back for the Cs too. You must be new to my threads if you think there tic-tack injuries hold any weight. Varejao is the only injured play we have mentioned that hold any real weight for his team, but he has been gone for long enough that his injury is accurately accounted for in this line. Wilcox is a net -2.7 (+/-), O'Neal is a net -5.3 (+/-) and Bass just barely contributes positively for the Celtics at +1.2.. The injuries are absolutely negligible in this match-up. |
capperintuition | 44 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by jaredms: what's ur twitter handle? I would like to follow. lost 500 on Nd tonight only have 1k to work w for the week need some help. Ty pal. Tough luck, cut those units down in size. No such thing as a sure shot. My handle is @mrchandman |
capperintuition | 44 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69: Good read. Like the picks. Also think Detroit at home is under valued vs Philly. The 76er offense has been sputtering and the Pistons have quietly been playing some nice ball. Also like the T Wolves catching 7 against the Clips, whos All Star tandem spent the weekend with the best of the best. Dont think they will be focused...
bol Agreed. I gave the Pistons a 3-point ATS edge, so they were just outside the bubble as well. If that line hits 5, I would consider taking them. I'll give a home dog the benefit of falling just short of my ATS edge threshold. |
capperintuition | 44 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by afgking4life: What do you think of Sacramento? Pegged them at a 3-point ATS edge. 5 points is my minimum for a play, so they are pretty close. I consider the Kings and Cavs games to be very similar, so the Cavs are a much better bargain but both have good ATS edges. |
capperintuition | 44 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by 308655406: Cleveland Cavaliers +3.5? even Anderson Varejao won't play? Varejao has been absent for the majority of Cleveland's past 10 games. Vegas has made adequate adjustments for his injury by now, it is negligible. Injuries to Wilcox and O'Neal carry more weight than Varejao's injury at this point. |
capperintuition | 44 |
|
|
As always, you can find my documented February ATS record and my full daily scoring table of mathematically projected scores in my covers space.
|
capperintuition | 44 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by si1ly: Great read. I can appreciate your style. We're both going after the same thing. My updated power ranking are up, you should check them out. My models agree with everything you said. New Jersey does play better on the road. The Cavs should be favored against Boston. Dallas should only win by 5. If I bet on value alone, these three games would be at the top of the list on my card. Good luck CI! Appreciate it, we definitely have similar perspectives. |
capperintuition | 44 |
|
|
Nice work, very similar to my power rankings, with a few exceptions.
Most notably: Not sure why you kicked the Spurs so far down the road rankings, they are my #5 road team and they have beaten more top-10 teams on the road than anyone else (4) You boosted Boston's road ranking quite a bit, they've gone 1-5 against top-15 teams on the road. Boston is my #25 road team. According to my rankings, more road teams play better on the road than you mentioned. I attribute the disparity to several factors, Weak/embarrassing home crowd: Phoenix New Orleans Road teams bring their "A" game to your arena: New York Hate their arena: New Jersey Nice work, all-around. Criticism intended to be nothing but constructive. Good luck. |
si1ly | 102 |
|
|
Last Thursday extended my streak of .500 or above nights to
9-straight. That streak includes 3 100% nights, but I still consider it
a bit of a cold streak. I did turn Thursday into a winning night by
hitting my second-straight middle in as many nights, with a 15.5-point
middle that odds makers allowed us to hit on the Hawks/Magic game. As
I’ve mentioned, I will release all halftime hedge bets for my official
plays via twitter, follow if you need help tracking and assessing hedges on the plays I post.
3 plays for Tuesday: Cleveland Cavaliers +3.5 Mathematically projected score: Celtics 91 Cavaliers 93 Looks like the public is bullish on the Celtics coming out of break. Maybe everyone has forgotten the Celtics forgettable start to the season. I’m expecting to read a lot of people say the Celtics are “rested” so that is the reason they will cover. Ah, the public and their futile attempts to explain why they make bandwagon bets on road favorites. The fact of the matter is that the Cavs are competitive enough to be favored in most of their games at home, why would this Boston team be an exception? A good way to evaluate this line is by looking at the UTA/SAC game tomorrow, Sacramento is laying 2 at home against a Jazz team that is quite similar to this Celtics team, I actually rank the Jazz a bit higher than the Celtics. Cleveland and Sacramento are my #23 and #24 ranked teams, respectively, so they are as similar as it gets. However, there is a 5.5-point disparity between the lines in these games. It’s a simple case of line-inflation for a road favorite with a strong tradition. I expect this line to improve with time. New Orleans Hornets +13.5 Mathematically projected score: Hornets 92 Bulls 98 The Hornets are quietly becoming one of the most undervalued teams in the NBA. They’ve snuck into my top-15 road teams and lines are still inflated despite the ATS cover streak they took into the break. Chicago holds a trend advantage on New Orleans, but that isn’t nearly enough to offset the resounding ATS edge the Hornets hold in this match. Chicago is a major contender that took a 60% cover rate into the break, books tend to evaluate themselves at the midway point and try to correct some of the teams they undervalues in the first half. Chicago is one of the teams that is likely to see far less ATS covers in the second half of this season, because the books lose money on popular teams that cover at a high rate. Another reason for this inflated line is the trouncing that Chicago put on the Hornets last time out, in NO. Every game is an independent event when it comes to probability, the public doesn’t understand that so you can always get value with a team that got blown out in the last match-up against a given team. The most recent memory I have of this situation is when we were on the Suns +2.5 at home against a Laker team that beat them by 12 points 2 days earlier. To jog your memory, the Suns won that game by 12 points.. I don’t expect the Hornets to beat the Bulls, but they will hang tough in a game where most of the Bulls focus will be on heading to San Antonio on the following night. This line has already moved a full point in the Hornets favor, so just let it push it’s way higher and higher. New Jersey Nets +10.5 Mathematically projected score: Nets 92 Mavericks 97 As you know, I love betting on New Jersey when they are on the road. They are on of the few counter intuitive teams that plays better on the road than they do at home (based on my weighted power rankings.) Also, the Nets are on Vegas’ midway evaluation as a team that needs to be boosted in order to avoid profitable blind fading. They covered only 43% of their games in the first half, anything that is outside the 48-52% range is a huge deal to Vegas odds makers. Keep in mind that most teams land within that 48-52% range by the end of the season, in terms of ATS win pct. On the other hand the Mavs are covering 58.8% of their spreads, an
alarming figure that should be priority #1 for odds makers to move on.
You CANNOT undervalue the defending world champions if you are trying to
minimize loss and maximize profits.. and Vegas undervalued the Mavs in
the first half of the season, don't expect them to continue making that mistake. This is another look-ahead game. Dallas is on the first leg of a b2b against a seemingly harmless Nets team and they have to head to Memphis the next night to take-on a divisional foe. The only issue is that the Nets have arguably the best point guard in the game, second-chance points from Humphries’ efforts, a top-5 rookie in Brooks.. oh, and they just got their 7-footer back. If the Nets are firing on all cylinders they have a shot with any team in the league, I’ll take a double digit cushion any day on the Nets. Once again, we are opposing public perception with this play so we can wait for a better number. |
capperintuition | 44 |
|
|
Barry is also the only white guy to win the past 27 years.. I don't see how anyone could take Budinger.
|
Realism | 18 |
|
|
I am taking George too. Not to be racist, but the last white guy to win the dunk contest was Brent Barry in 1996 so I consider George far more likely than Budinger to win.
|
Realism | 18 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by BigJohnStud: Knicks/Heat Under 202 Hawks +4.5 Spurs/Nuggets Over 203 in conclusion.. 3 - 0 today 74 - 51 ytd underrated for sure..nuff said.. Nice work on the plays. One question, though.. why is your documented YTD covers contest record 44-55 (44.44%) if your YTD record otherwise is 74-51 (59.2%)? I would understand a slight discrepancy, but 14.76%? https://contests.covers.com/Sportscontests/profile.aspx?user=527171&sportid=9 |
BigJohnStud | 40 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.