Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Due to birth of his son
https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/18334708/draymond-green-golden-state-warriors-thursday-birth-son |
coldbrew1130 | 3 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by killaman78: The line is right where it should be, but don't worry it will go up a half a point or so. There was no Paul Millsap the first time they played and like you stated they were on a back to back. The Hawks are well rested this time around, being this is their 3rd game played in the last 8 days. With that being said I'm all over Toronto!!!!!!! This is the correct answer |
davemsh | 27 |
|
|
Tailed you on the spurs/suns under. Loved that one, good call
|
koreatine | 24 |
|
|
rigged??
|
yorosan | 22 |
|
|
Got the +14 ! Nice !!
|
nbascout888 | 23 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by kir: If Nyk will play good tomorrow, it will be a close fight that GSW will not be able to cover the -14. Yeah I think I'll just take +14 Knicks. Warriors coming back home from a five game road trip and flying across the country.....right? |
coldbrew1130 | 5 |
|
|
Algorithms that come from offshore. I'm intrigued and would like to understand this a bit more.
|
coldbrew1130 | 24 |
|
|
Never say a team is "due" or that today will be different. When a team isn't playing well, why would you bet on them?
|
Osho1111 | 13 |
|
|
Vegas knows what they're doing. That's the only explanation.
|
AweIN | 15 |
|
|
Point total for the UCLA/UCSB was 164. Final score was 102-62. Unbelievable. How does it all work? Do they run simulations or something?
|
coldbrew1130 | 24 |
|
|
Warriors did lose to the Spurs and Rockets this year on TNT already.
Soooo.....Knicks ML tomorrow anyone? |
coldbrew1130 | 5 |
|
|
Ban
|
kellyp3 | 59 |
|
|
Everyone on here seems to be on Denver. Should I pick Oakland then?
|
datboy86 | 24 |
|
|
Is there any reason why I shouldn't play the under at 54? Would like to hear some thoughts/analysis
|
coldbrew1130 | 3 |
|
|
I'm leaning towards the obvious with Rams -3. But am I missing something?
|
coldbrew1130 | 11 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by flutie: You are wrong and reveal your lack of knowledge on the sport of pro football. Rogers called a time out. Then he tried to call another time-out which is against the rules. GB still had a time out when Rodgers called the second succesive TO. You obviously didn't watch the game or simply don't understand. I can sense some anger and frustration in this post. Are you ok? :( |
flutie | 33 |
|
|
I'm thinking the under at 41.5 could be a decent play. Thoughts?
|
coldbrew1130 | 7 |
|
|
wrong forum
|
coldbrew1130 | 2 |
|
|
I'm thinking about taking the under at 41.5. Thoughts?
|
coldbrew1130 | 2 |
|
|
What's the payout for this?
|
jwheels86 | 19 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.