Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
+6 KC was the number you wanted to grab it at. Spread moved way too much for my personally liking. Staying away, BOL to all tonight.
|
PHaNToM_CaPPeR | 9 |
|
|
Good Luck-Liam Neeson
|
ercem | 28 |
|
|
gotta take Illini here who are 12-1 at home. MSU 1-7-1 ATS in the last 9 meetings.
BOL |
dlasko71 | 5 |
|
|
Rutgers have lost the last 10 games and went 3-7 ATS. Indiana on a roll. I say keep rolling with them. Hoosiers -7
|
Shanegocards | 4 |
|
|
Ohio St 2h
|
mac39bps | 4 |
|
|
Just terrible defense toward the end. Gave up 2 3's to the same dude and the give up a 3 with 2 seconds left. Bunch of scrubs, should win that game by 10.
|
dlasko71 | 2 |
|
|
following
|
Cantiflas23 | 20 |
|
|
I spoke too soon..... Maybe
|
dlasko71 | 8 |
|
|
figures they implode 2h. The only time I bet against Kentucky on the road all year and now they decide to cover spreads. This forum is a curse, everytime I see more than 60% of the forum on one side, it always goes the other way. There is no profit in betting sports. In the end, the house ALWAYS wins. Stop wasting your money.
|
dlasko71 | 8 |
|
|
Happens almost every time. I see a ton of people on here taking a team and guess what, that team loses. Put me down for Calgary to win. BOL
|
dlasko71 | 11 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Digitalkarma: PHI +15 Sixers ML Why waste your money? |
Covers | 17 |
|
|
Same activity happened yesterday with OKC/Houston. Houston was -1.5 the night before, then a PK in the morning, then by game time, OKC was -1.5. Houston won. Not saying the same will happen tonight, but i think point variances apply only to special situations. Pistons play well on the road.
|
TheGreatSean | 8 |
|
|
Memphis -4.5
Cavs ML Lakers +6 Call me crazy. BOL to all |
dlasko71 | 1 |
|
|
Cinci 6-15 ATS last 21 road games
|
jquickfootball | 3 |
|
|
because they're going to win by 7
|
jquickfootball | 3 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Bizzey: Van Gundy lucky. LOL this guy. A top coach in league. Never said Van Gundy wasn't a great coach, but, win STREAKS are not easy to come by. Everyone needs a little bit of luck, and what I'm saying is that Van Gundy has some LUCK riding on his side at the moment considering how terrible the Pistons were to start the season. Pistons might not have won if Dallas had shot better but they got LUCKY. |
dlasko71 | 7 |
|
|
I can't tell you how many times this happens. I can guarantee anyone who looks at this game almost AUTOMATICALLY think Atlanta will win. I mean, how could they not, right? Top 5 defensive team in the league, playing out of their minds right now.
And then you have Detroit also playing hot, but if we look at who they have beat, only 2 wins really stand out. mavs and spurs. If we look closer into those games, we see that the mavs shot atrocious and the spurs basically had their B squad out on the court the entire time. I personally HATE betting on the side that has 70% or more of the action but I all signs are pointing to that 70% or more, for once, being correct. With that said, Things to consider, 70% or more will be on Atlanta tonight, yet the line opened at Atl -3 (most places) and is now down to Atl -2.5 Andre Drummond has been a nightmare in the paint for other teams. Yes, Atl defense is great, but who's going to stop him? Both teams are on win streaks and DO NOT want tonight to be the end of those streaks. Van Gundy has made a deal with the devil and has LUCK riding on his side. Both teams coming off 1 days rest. I have a gut feeling that this game will be decided by 1 or 2 points. Personally, im laying off. But, i see MORE value in betting the pistons than the hawks. And this is ONLY because more often than not, spreads that go unchanged or in the direction of where money is coming in, instead of going away from it, tend to NOT hit. Just my 2 cents. But betting against favs on the road with more than 70% riding on them, has been profitable. BOL |
dlasko71 | 7 |
|
|
This happens everytime. I see a bunch of people on one side and it almost always loses, yet i always bet it. And guess what, im gonna do it again.
|
justlol | 11 |
|
|
What do you guys look at? Because apparently stats have nothing to do with it. I cant win more than 2 on any day. Everything looks good on a match-up, and then a team loses by 6 when they were favored by 8. I don't understand betting College ball, way too inconsistent. Anyone have some insights they could share? I hate these stupid invitationals to begin with, its impossible to cap them. Example, Purdue's defense was SUPPOSE to be one of the best, yet look at the score. I know thiers two halves, but what about the first half would lead you to think purdue is going to come out hot the 2nd. It makes no sense betting on these games.
|
dlasko71 | 1 |
|
|
Lions D is a million times better than the colts against the Run. Do you look at stats?
|
911TruthNow | 22 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.