Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Surprised no one mentioned GB @ CHI Week 1. I'm a Bears fan, but expect them to get crushed. Packers relatively stable from last year while Chicago is just the opposite. I believe Rodgers has a poor week 1 record, however. Still I'd be very impressed if Chicago manages to lose by less than 5.5 or win outright.
|
DoubleUp4Life | 41 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Amazatron: Well, this exact scenario has happened 5 times in the playoffs this year (series tied 1-1, home team wins game 3), and the team that went up 2-1 has lost every series. Nice find. |
begginerboy | 18 |
|
|
If golden state was 2-1 favorite heading the series against Cleveland, were they really -400 during the last round? -400 seems extreme. Curious at what point the line was that inflated..
|
sunyatsen | 19 |
|
|
Remain calm. GS is down 2-1 in the best of 7. Hedging with the Cavs eliminates your (very) possible chance to profit. Most likely, the series will be all tied up tomorrow night.
If you still like the Cavs to win the series after losing to GS tomorrow, then you could pull off a hedge that wouldn't be quite as painful. But odds are by that point you will be wondering why you ever doubted the Warriors. |
sunyatsen | 19 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by LIanafranks5: Well I apologize for annoying you and others. I dont really care what you guys think though. Was just trying to help you guys win some money. But don't worry I won't post picks here anymore. Learned my lesson today! But I did go 2-0 with my ats picks in this game. I thought rockets would lose by 2. I thought that's how they'd rig it. That's all. I keep it simple. You guys over think a lot of your games and it frustrates me. From an elite capper such as myelf, I'm just tyrin to help you guys win some games and give ya good advice. But most of you don't appreciate it. Keep being sore losers then. I'm happy even though I lost today. I don't go around blaming others because I lose a bet, like most of you do here on this site. You didn't win anything. You bet Clippers and Under Hou total points. You are the most narcissistic, delusional person I have ever known. You are a compulsive liar. You do not win 90% of your bets like you claim. You are not an "elite capper". You do not help people win $, unless they are fading you. PLEASE GO AWAY. |
LIanafranks5 | 261 |
|
|
I'm with you! Locked in at -1. Also like TT points over for ATL. CLE defense is suspect and you know Korver is going to start dropping 3s eventually.
|
prestige33 | 24 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by LIanafranks5: Oh it's definitely rigged you fool. All the money on the clippers here obviously and vegas greed rears its ugly head again. Now the fans have to settle for a boring warriors/rockets series. Like I said everything in the universe is rigged. I knew Rockets would win once it came down to it, because I realized "Why didnt covers move my thread to the penalty box?" They always move winning threads there. So the fact that I got no resistance proved that rockets would win. That's how sad this site is. Real winners aren't allowed here. Excuses for everything. LlanaFranks5 how embarrassing that loss was for you. All you did was talk up your LAC bets and your under bet on HOU total points. You dismissed anyone who disagreed with you. Tell the HOU backers they were right. Own your losses. Stop with the excuses! |
LIanafranks5 | 261 |
|
|
Your point system isn't very methodical. you've picked a handful of factors and assigned point values that don't represent what each category is really worth.
A few bones to pick. DeAndre has outplayed Dwight and CP3 has outplayed Harden. Harden wasn't even in the game for Houston's comeback last game. Then you can add Blake on top for Clippers. That is a serious advantage for Clippers. Also, the match odds do not influence who is going to win, unlike all the other factors. I could show you a huge underdog w/great odds, but I wouldn't award them a point in my analysis of who will win because of it. |
Iainsc2 | 10 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by LIanafranks5: Nah I'm serious. Past Rocket stats mean nothing here. But if you wanna bet them, go right ahead. There's a reason why I win 90% of my bets. LOL. Only stats I like matter and I win 90% so everyone else can stfu. hahahahahaha |
Enjoi | 36 |
|
|
Down to 53% on LAC, btw.
|
UglyKidJoe | 21 |
|
|
Do you have any sources to back up what you are saying? I didn't just make up 56%.. Or are you just guessing?
|
UglyKidJoe | 21 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by AnthonyStarks: The world is apparently a little larger than you seem to be aware of 56% isn't a number, it is a percentage. So, no matter how large the world is, the percent could apply. Apparently you are a bitter stupider than you seem to be aware. |
UglyKidJoe | 21 |
|
|
replied to
stat geeks we know 8 teams have come back from being down 1-3 but how many teams...
in NBA Betting
Excellent question OP! Thanks for the answer AussieDownUnder!!
I gotta lean Clips here. I think Doc is a better coach with more experience winning in the playoffs. And Deandre Jordan has outplayed Dwight, imo. |
begginerboy | 16 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by AnthonyStarks: The whole world is on LA Well, 56% of the world at least. |
UglyKidJoe | 21 |
|
|
man what a game!
|
drozanski | 3 |
|
|
game over.
|
drozanski | 3 |
|
|
lol teague plays so much slower haha
|
gamblorman | 6 |
|
|
lol Schroder made so many clutch layups to fend off every Wiz run. Took over the point when Teague was struggling
|
gamblorman | 6 |
|
|
I have a feeling. but will it be enough?
|
drozanski | 1 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by BornToDie: the right question is how he is a nba player wow you guys are amateurs. probably see a good team have one bad game and then you fade them, when you should expect a bounce back. |
BowmansAddict | 8 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.