Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
You are obviously unaware of why you should never hedge:
https://www.covers.com/forum/nfl-betting-21/to-hedge-or-not-to-hedge-here-is-the-math-and-why-hedging-is-a-bad-idea-740779 |
geniussavant | 13 |
|
|
If you are considering hedging, then why did you include that last leg on the parlay card at all? If you had left it off, you would already have won your bet and made your profit and could now bet all of that profit, or all of the initial bet and the profit, on this last leg.
If you find yourself in a position to hedge, you have already made a fundamental error.
|
geniussavant | 13 |
|
|
Any belief there is a "script" is based upon poor reasons.
There's no evidence there is a script. There's no evidence the game is fixed.
The time to believe in something, anything at all, is after there is evidence and a valid justification to warrant that belief. Not before.
|
SHMACK | 40 |
|
|
@unplucked_gem
Can I see wifi?
No, I can't "see" wifi. I also can't "see" air. But we have can demonstrate both exist. We can make tests on wifi. We can make tests on air. Others can make the same tests and arrive at the same results. We have actual evidence both of them exist.
Not sure what your point is, since you don't have to "see" something to be able to demonstrate it exists. Good grief.
There is no evidence the NFL is "fixed" or "rigged." None. Zero. And thus, there's no valid reason to believe it is. There's no valid justification to warrant that belief.
Of course, if you do have actual evidence that none of us are privy to, please submit it so it can be peer-reviewed. Thanks.
|
badiola | 22 |
|
|
@Bill7 Of course I'm serious. Please demonstrate and provide this evidence that you seem to believe exists that the NFL is fixed. I'll wait. And what does Tim Donaghy have to do with the NFL? He was an NBA referee who bet on games he officiated. We have evidence for all of that. When you have evidence for something, that's a valid reason for belief. That's a valid justification to warrant that belief. We have absolutely no evidence this same thing is happening in the NFL. None. Zero. Thus, any beliefs the NFL is "fixed" is currently completely unjustified. The time to believe in something, anything at all, is after there is evidence and a valid justification to warrant that belief. Not before. There might be a teapot orbiting the sun, in between Earth and Mars, that is just too small to be seen with our telescopes. But until we have evidence for such an object, there is no valid reason to believe it exists. |
badiola | 22 |
|
|
There is no evidence the NFL is fixed. None. Zero.
And thus, your beliefs are unfounded and unjustified. Your beliefs are most likely based upon ignorance, confirmation bias, and personal incredulity.
The time to believe in something, anything at all, is after there is evidence and a valid justification to warrant that belief. Not before.
|
badiola | 22 |
|
|
If you "firmly believe" the referees try to "control the flow of games" then you most certainly are "rigged / fixed" guy.
There's no evidence at all for your beliefs. None. You're a victim of confirmation bias and personal incredulity.
|
aussievegas1777 | 5 |
|
|
There is no evidence any games are fixed. What are you talking about?
|
LVPrince | 11 |
|
|
The problem for me has been replying to posts. One, I lose all paragraph breaks... everything is run together and makes it difficult to read. Two, the "Quote Post" links don't work for me. I click it but the post I want to quote is not entered into this REPLY box. I've tried multiple browsers and it's the same with all of them. I've contacted the site and I've asked them what can I do to fix this issue... and I've heard nothing back from them.
Only if I EDIT my post after I submit it, can I then enter paragraph breaks... assuming I see that 5-Minute EDIT box. (Sometimes I don't.) |
lajohn | 18 |
|
|
"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence."
|
theMatrix24 | 15 |
|
|
There is zero evidence NFL games are rigged/scripted/predetermined, etc. Zero. Zilch.
|
RSampsell | 31 |
|
|
rosswin97: just because I flip heads 5 times in a row doesn’t mean the 6th time gonna be heads
Actually, that's a bad analogy.
You have a 50-50 chance of flipping a head or tail and the prior flips have no bearing on the next flip.
But if the Lions were 17 out of 20 on 4th down of three yards or less during the regular season, that's far, far from a 50-50 proposition. Furthermore, because humans are involved, the high percentage of prior successes could indeed come into play. (Confidence factor, etc.)
Your post seems to imply going for it ob 4th down, with a prior 17/20 successful percentage was not the right call. If that's the case, how high does the prior percentage have to be before you do think it's the right call?
|
Espn80000 | 34 |
|
|
replied to
To hedge or not to hedge, here is the math and why hedging is a bad idea....
in NFL Betting "If you find yourself in a POSITION to hedge, you've already made a fundamental error." |
vanzack | 735 |
|
|
replied to
To hedge or not to hedge, here is the math and why hedging is a bad idea....
in NFL Betting kimberton: i guess it’s personal decision, but I don’t know how your saying it’s a bad idea to hedge and not guarantee a win. "Guaranteeing a win" is not always a smart move. It can cost you money. If your goal is to win as much $$$ as you can, which is usually the case, then yes, it's a bad idea to hedge. Let's say your chosen football team, a team that was favored by just a single point, is leading by ten points with just two minutes left to go in the game. If they cover the spread, which it look like they will almost certainly do, you win $1,000! (Your risk was $550.) I come along and offer to buy your ticket from you, right now, for $700. Do you sell it to me? If your answer is no, they why not? I'm offering you guaranteed money! There's still a few minutes left to play! Anything could still happen in this game! You paid $550 for it and I'm offering you $700 right here and now! It's guaranteed money! It's a guaranteed profit! Well, of course you shouldn't sell it to me or anyone else. At least not for $700. The reason is simple - that ticket, at this moment in time, is worth much more than $700. Depending upon exact game scenario (exactly how much time is left and who has the ball), that ticket is probably worth closer to to $950 or $1,000... or more. This is EXACTLY what happens when you hedge. You sell something for less than what it's worth. You normally do NOT want to do this, whether you're selling a car or a house or whatever. Hedging comes at a price and YOU have to pay that price. You will make more money in a very short period of time if you never hedge. Let's say you bet a four-team parlay each and every weekend, for the next two years. Let's say you are fortunate enough to win the first three legs of your parlay each and every time. So you, with your logic to "guarantee a win," hedge your bet each time. Let's say I also bet a four-team parlay each and every weekend, for the next two years. I am also fortunate enough to win the first three legs each and every time. And yet I chose NOT to ever hedge and let it ride. You won 104 weekends in a row. You won every single weekend. You guaranteed a profit each and every week. And yet I, most likely, only won half of my bets. (In all probability, I lost that last leg about half the time.) And yet who has more money, me or you? Yes, I do. Do the math. Despite you not halving a single losing weekend, because of all of your hedging, I have more money than you. |
vanzack | 735 |
|
|
Ah. Division winners. (And not just making the playoffs.) Thanks. Either way, you really should do the math. Estimate the overall probability of the event occurring. Give it an actual percentage, even though you don't see it happening. (Few people "saw" the Eagles losing at home to the Cardinals this past weekend, for example, but it happened.) After estimating the probability of the event, determine how much it will cost you to accept the buyout. I suspect you will be selling your ticket at a value far below what its true value is. You don't want to do that. If you do that regularly, you will not be a winner. Oh, sure you might be a winner short term, but that's not the goal. You want to be a winner year in and year out, not just on any particular weekend. |
unplucked_gem | 17 |
|
|
The buyout is a type of hedging. If you want to maximize your long-term profits, do NOT hedge. Let's say your chosen football team, a team that was favored by just a single point, is leading by ten points with just a few minutes left to go in the game. If they cover the spread, which it look like they will almost certainly do, you win $1,000.00! (Your risk was $550.00.) I come along and offer to buy your ticket from you, right now, for $700. Do you sell it to me? If your answer is no, they why not? I'm offering you guaranteed money! There's still a few minutes left to play! Anything could still happen in this game! Well, of course you shouldn't sell it to me or anyone else. At least not for $700. The reason is simple - that ticket, at this moment in time, is worth much more than $700.00. Depending upon exact game scenario (exactly how much time is left and who has the ball), that ticket is probably worth closer to to $950. This is EXACTLY what happens when you hedge. You sell something for less than what it's worth. You normally do NOT want to do this, whether you're selling a car or a house or whatever. Hedging comes at a price and YOU have to pay that price. You will make more money in a very short period of time if you never hedge. To put it another way, if you and I bet on the same teams/games, and you hedge whenever you can and I never hedge, I will very soon have more money than you. Maybe not that weekend... maybe not that month... but very soon. |
unplucked_gem | 17 |
|
|
I'm not sure I understand the bet. You win the bet if Buffalo and Dallas and New Orleans all make the postseason? If so, you have to look at what happens long term. In order for the Saints to make the playoffs, they have to defeat the Falcons, and the Bucs have to lose to the Panthers. (Actually, there are other ways for the Saints to make the playoffs. For example, they can win and the Packers lose or tie plus the Seahawks lose or tie. However, we can ignore these other ways for the moment.) The Saints are favored by about 4. This corresponds to a winning percentage of about 63%. https://wizardofodds.com/games/sports-betting/nfl/ The Panthers are underdogs by about 5 points. This corresponds to a winning percentage of about 25%. The chances of both events happening are the probability of the two individual events. .63 x .25 is roughly 16%. 16% of the time you will win $1,596, for a total of $25,536. 84% of the time you will lose $11, for a total loss of -$924. Your net for these 100 events is $26,460. This $26,460 is what you can expect if you let the bet stand, and played it out 100 times. (Naturally, you can adjust the winning percentages a tiny bit, if you don't feel they are accurate.) OR, it appears you can take the $156 buyout offer right now, for a total of $15,600. $156 x 100 = $15,600) This is what you can expect if you take the buyout, all 100 times. As you can see, the buyout offered to you is far short of what you would receive long term. Many posters here, like the1toturn2, will tell you to take the "guaranteed" money. Taking "guaranteed money" is not always a smart move and I can prove it with very simple examples. You have to think long term. (My apologies if my paragraphs are lost when I post this. I still am having a formatting problem when posting.) |
unplucked_gem | 17 |
|
|
Cowboys likely the #2 Seed. Lions likely the #3 Seed. If they meet in the playoffs, it will be in Dallas.
|
Irisheric777 | 30 |
|
|
And again, my paragraphs are lost once I hit SUBMIT. I wish I knew why.
|
ActionMagnet | 11 |
|
|
There are three times when the game clock will stop when a ball carrier goes out of bounds after making a catch:
After a change of possession
After the two-minute warning of the first half
Inside the last five minutes of the second half
There is one situation when the runner will step out of bounds, and the game clock will continue to run in the last two minutes of the first half or the last five minutes of the second half. That situation is this: The clock will continue to run if the runner goes out of bounds BACKWARD after being contacted by a defender.
However, when a runner goes out of bounds at any other point in the game, the game clock will BRIEFLY stop to give the officials time to spot the ball. The game clock will resume as soon as the official gives the signal when the ball is spotted.
NFL owners approved the current clock rule for a runner going out of bounds after the 1990 season. (Before the rule change, the clock stopped whenever a runner went out of bounds. This was done in an effort to speed up the game. Halftime was reduced from 15 to 12 minutes at the same time.)
|
ActionMagnet | 11 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.