Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
I just did and it was apparently turned into the local police department a few hours later. I am wondering if it is safe for me to assume that nobody copied the information off it and is planning to steal my identity. Or should I ask the DOT/DMV to change my number to be safe? I do have a fraud alert my credit report already from a previous incident unrelated to a license issue.
P.S. I would prefer somebody respond who lives in the u.s. and has experienced the same type of thing |
fish1982 | 10 |
|
![]() |
does anybody know what happened with firstrowsports and nfl network?
when I click on it now, it just pops up another page of channel
listings.
|
fish1982 | 2 |
|
![]() |
Why is the government not letting the Sandy Storm homeowners back into their homes or only an hour at time and only to fill one bag worth of stuff? If people want to risk their house collapsing on them, why is that the government's concern? And then the government wonders why people refuse to follow mandatory evacuation orders- it's because people will never be let back in their house if they leave. Where is the freedom in that?
|
fish1982 | 1 |
|
![]() |
replied to
Did you know your employer can make you work 80 consecutive hours WITHOUT having to pay overtime?
in General Discussion Quote Originally Posted by fish1982:
once again another person failing to answer my specific question and going down the "here is an example of something worse or if you don't like it leave" line. |
fish1982 | 41 |
|
![]() |
replied to
Did you know your employer can make you work 80 consecutive hours WITHOUT having to pay overtime?
in General Discussion
and please leave out starting my own business or getting weekends or other days off. they have nothing to do with my question.
|
fish1982 | 41 |
|
![]() |
replied to
Did you know your employer can make you work 80 consecutive hours WITHOUT having to pay overtime?
in General Discussion Quote Originally Posted by thorpe: In places where workers work 7 days a week, most people want the weekends off. If there is a rotation of who gets the weekend off, some 7 day spans you will get more than 40 hours and others less, but you still average 40 hours per week. Why should you get overtime? When my father was a resident at a hospital, he worked 36 hours straight, 12 hours off, then 36 more hours, etc, for 2 years. The only time he missed a shift was when I was born. Your 48 or 56 hour work week is not something you should be complaining about, but if it is that loathsome to you, quit and find a union job. once again another person failing to answer my specific question and going down the "here is an example of something worse or if you don't like it leave" line. |
fish1982 | 41 |
|
![]() |
replied to
Did you know your employer can make you work 80 consecutive hours WITHOUT having to pay overtime?
in General Discussion |
fish1982 | 41 |
|
![]() |
replied to
Did you know your employer can make you work 80 consecutive hours WITHOUT having to pay overtime?
in General Discussion
it could be worse, then we go again.
|
fish1982 | 41 |
|
![]() |
replied to
Did you know your employer can make you work 80 consecutive hours WITHOUT having to pay overtime?
in General Discussion Quote Originally Posted by bill702: I still don't get the problem like salty said there aren't many employers that want you working 10 days straight, but when it happens enjoy your 4 days off. Even if you dont get the 4 days off in a row you're still getting the 2 days off a week you're entitled to without overtime.It's better then having split days off.You go in knowing how the pay period is set up so it's not like they are surprising you. They are working within the meaning of the law what else do you want? Also, it will always come down to the basic argument if you don't like it leave. That's just how life works the laws are in place and you are aware of them it's a two way street. People don't always go into a job knowing how their schedule will work out. They may usually work xyz, but something comes up and their boss forces them work abc and they didn't know or expect that when they applied for the job. Secondly, what do you mean "it's a two way street?" Like you can leave for any reason or they can fire you for any reason? because that is not exactly a two way street because it is usually much easier for an employer to replace an employee than it is for an employee to find another comparable job. Just look at the application process. 90% of the population applies for dozens of jobs waiting for a single offer whereas an employer advertises a job and gets to pick between dozens of candidates. It's not a two way street. It's more like they get 5 lanes and you get 1. What if an employee was being mistreated just because they were black. the laws aside, would you say "if you don't like it leave"or "it's a two way street-at will employment" |
fish1982 | 41 |
|
![]() |
replied to
Did you know your employer can make you work 80 consecutive hours WITHOUT having to pay overtime?
in General Discussion Quote Originally Posted by Gunners: get a salary. then work 80 hours a week and you won't have the option for overtime. gets you over it quick-like While I appreciate the the comments made by MaineRoad the comments by Gunners quoted above is another example along the line of the "if you don't like it leave" argument. His goes along the line of comparing something bad to something worse as a way to justify the bad thing. Both fail to address the issue and instead denigrate the presenter or go off topic. The question simply is to do you support employers who manipulate employee schedules to avoid the legal obligation to pay overtime rates? |
fish1982 | 41 |
|
![]() |
replied to
Did you know your employer can make you work 80 consecutive hours WITHOUT having to pay overtime?
in General Discussion Quote Originally Posted by Skipbone: Well, you could always keep bitching. That's an option. The first step in change is usually informing people and the second is getting support which is what I was trying to do. It is very difficult for a single person to change public policy by themselves. |
fish1982 | 41 |
|
![]() |
replied to
Did you know your employer can make you work 80 consecutive hours WITHOUT having to pay overtime?
in General Discussion
for those of you using the "if you don't like it leave" type of argument, how about the person that is wrong leaves or better yet, what is broken gets fixed. you could use that argument for anything. the laws aside, If my employer was beating us with whips and paying us a quarter per hour your solution would be "if you don't like it leave."
|
fish1982 | 41 |
|
![]() |
replied to
Did you know your employer can make you work 80 consecutive hours WITHOUT having to pay overtime?
in General Discussion Quote Originally Posted by SALTY: Having filed an overtime claim personally with the Arkansas labor board and won. Resulting in my boss/owner of company having to legally cut me an extra check for $1500 when he told me I would never get a dime originally. He never thought I was capable of reading laws and backing up what I said because he was the type of Guy who thinks he is smarter than everyone. I can't click your link but I just do not see how your logic works cause in Arkansas, that would not fly. so copy and past the link |
fish1982 | 41 |
|
![]() |
replied to
Did you know your employer can make you work 80 consecutive hours WITHOUT having to pay overtime?
in General Discussion
What it says: got cut off:
Most people think it is 40 before being forced to pay 1.5X normal rate, but because it must be over 40 in a WORKWEEK and an employer is given the freedom to make up whatever workweek they want (as long it is consecutive days) they can manipulate your schedule to split those 80 hours in half. For example, let us say you always work 8 hours a day for the sake of argument. Your employer makes the pay period Thursday to Wednesday. You could be made to work Saturday August 25th to Monday Sept. 3rd (10 straight days at 8 hours a day for a total of 80 hours) an NOT be legally entitled to overtime. They do this because THEIR WORKWEEK ends after Wednesday Aug. 29th and cuts that 80 into two 40s. So basically assuming you work 8 hours a day the only way to guarantee overtime pay (federally, at least) is to work at least 11 straight days. https://www.dol.gov/whd/regs/compliance/whdfs23.pdf |
fish1982 | 41 |
|
![]() |
created a topic
Did you know your employer can make you work 80 consecutive hours WITHOUT having to pay overtime?
in General Discussion Most people think it is 40 before being forced to pay 1.5X normal rate, but because it must be over 40 in a WORKWEEK and an employer is given the freedom to make up whatever workweek they want (as long it is consecutive days) they can manipulate your schedule to split those 80 hours in half. For example, let us say you always work 8 hours a day for the sake of argument. Your employer makes the pay period Thursday to Wednesday. You could be made to work Saturday August 25th to Monday Sept. 3rd (10 straight days at 8 hours a day for a total of 80 hours) an NOT be legally entitled to overtime. They do this because THEIR WORKWEEK ends after Wednesday Aug. 29th and cuts that 80 into two 40s. So basically assuming you work 8 hours a day the only way to guarantee overtime pay (federally, at least) is to work at least 11 straight days. |
fish1982 | 41 |
|
![]() |
Using excel does anybody know how to make a new row after 3 column cells of data?Here is what I have got: First I
had a string of data that was in one big column, but I wanted it to
run horizontal instead of vertical so I got that by copying, selecting
paste special then checking box "transpose". That was step 1, now I
need to get to the second step which is figure out how to make every
three columns break up and go to the next row since that starts a new
record. For example, let us say that I have 10 students in a class and
I have there first name in one cell, last name in the second cell and
their age in the 3rd cell. The problem is that they are all in one
long row so if I have 10 students, it is all in row 1 and goes from
column A to all the way to column DD or whatever and I need it to start a
new row after going to column C so instead of the table running from
row 1 to column DD I need it to run from row 1-10 and column A-C. got
it? There are a few things to keep in mind:
1. I am currently using Excel 2003, but I am sure 2007 or 2010 is much the same 2. I do NOT need the data WITHIN the cell separated. Each piece of data is already separated into each cell 3. There is no unique character like a colon or comma at the end of each cell so I can't use that as some sort of marker to tell EXCEL when to break into a new row 4. I basically need to tell it to go to a new row after so many cells or columns, how do I do that??? 5. I have tried the DATA-TEXT to Columns feature I don't think that is the answer |
fish1982 | 6 |
|
![]() |
I am doing a contest at work where we have to pick one team each week
straight up to win and can't re use a team. Longest streak wins. We
must submit all picks before the season though. I am thinking of just
picking the team with the biggest spread but leaving out division games
and road teams because I know if a team is home or playing a familiar
foe they can more easily pull the upset. Any other type of game I
should leave out? Also, anybody have a good link where I can get the
spread for all games til the end of the season. Thanks.
|
fish1982 | 1 |
|
![]() |
created a topic
Any idea why some podcasts will play on my phone from iTunes and others won't?
in Technology
I transfer them from iTunes on my desktop by simply dragging them onto a
folder that I get by inserting my phone's computer memory card into the
desktop. I then take the memory card out of the desktop and put back
into the phone and every podcast seems to play except the Dave Ramsey
podcast. What is the deal? At first I thought it was because it was
pre set to open with Windows media player instead of the usual iTunes,
but then I right clicked and went to properties and changed to default
open to iTunes, but it still won't work. When I try to play on my phone
it just quickly pops back to the folder screen from the player screen.
I don't see any difference between those that do play and those that
don't when I look under properties. Both seem to be the "MPEG Layer 3
Audio (.mp3)" file type. Any ideas?
|
fish1982 | 1 |
|
![]() |
Just look at how the Arizona Immigration law is still being challenged:
https://news.yahoo.com/ariz-immigration-law-opponents-file-offensive-003808158.html With the majority votes of the people, the signing off by the governor, ready law enforcement and the passage by the highest court in the land, there are STILL legal avenues to challenge the law. This whole system of check/balances, separation of powers, court overseeing, endless bureaucratic appeals does more harm than good. Nothing can get done in this country. At some point efficiency has to be given some weight what say you? |
fish1982 | 10 |
|
![]() |
I
have an idea of how to solve these contract problems where guys think
they are out performing their current contract. Every year have every
player re-negotiate their contract according to how they performed the
past season. This way guys would not feel under appreciated and owners
would not feel they are over-paying for a under performing player. Here
would be the rules: 1. The current team has first negotiating rights so guys wouldn't be switching teams every
year 2. To
prevent the extra work required by the general manager and other team
personnel you could have a statistical/pay chart to help automate the
process (e.g. you gain this many yards you get paid X, you get this many
tackles you get Y, etc) 3.
Position coaches could also be asked to rank their respective players
in terms of value to the team as another factor to help alleviate the
problem of guys being important to the team, but not putting up big
numbers 4.
Players that get injured could keep the same salary from the previous
year 5. Guys would also be less inclined to switch teams a lot which would make the fans happy because it is unlikely there are going to be 2 or 3 receivers who put up huge numbers on one team and unlikely there are going to be multiple linebackers who have huge tackle numbers or multiple DEs who put huge sack numbers because there are only so many plays, yards, sacks, tackle, etc. opportunities in a game. -Joe Iowa
|
fish1982 | 3 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.