Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kaepernick 1st career start monday night football against the Bears who were at the time playing the best defense in the league. He carves up the d and gets the win, @ NE Sunday night football in december and they get out to a 31-3 lead... Yeah they got complacent and let NE catch up, but then he hits crab for the game winner! All i hear is talk about the Seattle and St. Louis games, but everyone forgets they are division rivals so games should be tight, and they got it handed to them by a pumped up Seattle team in the toughest place to play in nfl. He already had his down moments on the season, and his high moments are why harbaugh made him the starter and he is one of the best young qbs in the league. The flight doesn't matter in this case since SF have been home since Dec. 24th! Harbaugh, Greg Roman, Vic Fangio > Mike Smith, Dirk Koetter, Mike Nolan (Not even close) 49ers 4 losses and 1 tie their Defense gave up 143 yards/game rushing... in their 12 wins (including GB playoff game) opponents ran for 74.5 yards per/game. Atlanta offense averaging 87.1 yards/game rushing @ only 3.7 yards/carry. I see atlanta staying near their season avg and niners rolling 31-20 |
LeagueCapper | 83 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:
Man....im done responding to the same subject.
You people are funny. You keep saying take away a couple plays or a couple drives and they didnt do anything..... I mean come on???? You cant take away anything.... Its unfair to say take away a few plays or drives to talk about what a team did during THE GAME..... Gb isnt a running team.... They arent going to pound the ball 25+ for 150 yds.... Rodgers gets big runs often....Cobb gets big runs often....you cant not count those
And, if you think that if Rodgers scrambling on 25% of his passes means pressure from the D...you dont watch GB enough
Dude! Who the FUK said take away their plays?? i said they did ok on the 1st drive with the 1 run for 18 yards... After that GBs best running play was a scramble by aaron rodgers! thats not success!! Rodgers scrambling was not by choice, it was forced! I tried taking you serious, but youre a joke like everyone is saying bro! And you look like a douche bag! |
LETGOPACK1234 | 130 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:
I think Harris had a 18 yard run up the middle not getting touched for a TD Rodgers had a run that led to points Do those not count???
Yes, I think they ran enough to keep the D honest.....how many sacks did SF get???? ALOT LESS than you thought going into the game correct??? Yeah i already stated in my last post on their 1st scoring drive they ran ok, after that drive they had no success... If Aaron Rodgers scrambling on a pass is the best run the pack had all night then thats not having success running the ball!! I think they only had 1 sack, but the pressure was there all night... i would say 25% of his dropbacks he was scrambling out of the pocket or taking a hit... 1 sack, but they did get plenty of pressure |
LETGOPACK1234 | 130 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by riq:
Hahahahahahahaha the clock does stop until they reset the ball. Way to call someone out without knowing anything. Epic ok clock stops to reset ball, then starts back up again... It doesn't stay stopped like an incomplete pass, change of possession, etc... |
Gambleholic | 23 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by BarrelledIn:
LMFAO at the know it all tard boys here acting like it's a dumb question. The clock stops on a sack EXCEPT in the final 2 minutes of a half. dude youre an even bigger idiot than the guy asking the question... Sack is like a run play, so clock continues to run at all times! dont respond if you dont even know the facts |
Gambleholic | 23 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:
Yeah....we get it man.... Like I said....Not many people thought Gb would run the ball at all....I am willing to bet MAJORITY of people would say GB WOULD NOT get 100 yds for the game on the ground.... If more people thought they would, then I am wrong....but I am willing to bet people didnt think they would get that Im not saying the dominated on the ground, but they did MUCH better than most people thought Who cares about 100 yards and if anyone thought they would?? My question is were they meaningful yards? Did they convert any short yardage 3rd downs, did they have any big runs to set up scores? Did they run consistently to keep the Defense honest? My answers to all those are NO! Youre way off base with your statement that the packers had success on the ground! |
LETGOPACK1234 | 130 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:
Funny....people said all I do is make excuses. Defense is part of the game. Fact is....with 7 min left in the 3rd qtr...it was 24-24. SF didnt shut-down GB. People said GB WONT run the ball....GB CANT PROTECT Rodgers.... Maybe SF dominated time of poss and on offense, but it doesnt change the fact that it was 24-24 in the middle of the 3rd qtr yeah 24-24 mid 3rd quarter and 7 pts was pick 6, and gb barely had 200 yards of offense to that point... they did shut gb down, the total points doesn't tell the whole story on how the game was going. Rodgers was under pressure mostly all game with only 4 pass rushers. yeah they had 104 yards with 53 from harris most on the 1st scoring drive, 28 from rogers 23 from cobb.... thats not exactly being successful on the ground! tell me when the packers ran the ball in a critical situation and were successful! numbers don't tell the whole story so yeah 100 yards is ok, but watching the game, there is no way you can say GB had success running... you try and be classy, but make ridiculous statements like San Fran didn't shut GB down! What game were u watching?? Whole 2nd half rodgers and co were going 3 and out, 26-39 257 yards is not a good game by rodgers standards... They just got exposed in the playoffs for 2nd year in a row. no run game, and allowing Kaep to run for most yards in history for a qb... Your team is built to be a juggernaut in regular season, but that style of play fails miserably in playoff football |
LETGOPACK1234 | 130 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by SwishSwish1234:
The line opened up at SF -3.5 +105 on pinnacle within 30 minutes down to -3 -115, Now sits at -3 +106, The sharps seem real confident in SF. I know Green Bay has 61 % on covers consensus and you have this wannabe contrarian mentality where anything that looks square you won't touch but i've got news for you, Sometimes the square bet wins, Plus it can't be too square when you have everyone on this forum agreeing with you regards to SF.
Betting on a rookie QB making his first play off start against a side that is in the play offs year in year out, Really smart and not at all risky. Packers have been in playoffs 4 years in a row with 2 of them going one and done, so lets not make it like the pack is some juggernaut... Russell Wilson made his first playoff start on the road and looked pretty good so i guess the Seattle backers were not very smart huh? Home start in the playoffs much easier than road start, plust the best defense in football makes it that much easier on Kaep |
LeagueCapper | 216 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by amd:
Thats a pretty subjective statement to make to define the health of the Packers. How many receivers do the Packers need to be considered 'healthy?" James, Jennings, Finley and Cobb are enough for me. darn it...throw Crabtree in there and you have a full house. Cobb had 1 catch for 4 yards... I dont think thats subjective at all... Finley and Crabtree are actually TE's so if I said pass catchers then yeah you could bring them up... if nelson isn't healthy and cobb is slowed by ankle then you got jennings and james jones, so thats not healthy |
LeagueCapper | 216 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:
WOW....be careful with those kind of "excuses".....I get KILLED on this site because I said GB had a game off against NY this year after a big win at Detroit and I STILL GET CREAMED for it.... I 100% understand where you come from, but 90% of people on this site dont understand how that happens... As for your comments I disagree....many teams do it without the run now. GB does plenty of screens to the RB, and WR screens and swing passes that have the result of runs. They run just enough. As for the SF run against us. Call me crazy, but I think the pistol favors GB. As seen, GB cant stop a power runner right at them. They are smaller upfront, but they have crazy speed on the outside. I know Webb isnt kaep, but we shut down the Qb run while also shutting down AP.
Either way, its going to be an awesome game. Like I said, I think this winner, wins it all If SF wins, they will need to score 24+. Im not sure they can do that Yeah i know what youre saying, no excuses just letdown spot... Seattle ran them out the stadium, thats not debatable, just the circumstances of that game being changed to primetime changed the dynamic... but anyways, Green bay throws quick bubble screens all the time on 1st downs as a different way to "run" the ball, but they are counting on YAC yards... San Fran has the best tackling team in the league, and hardly ever do you see missed tackles by that defense... Team speed is crazy on their D with Willis and Bowman all over RBs and quick screens so thats not gonna get them much yardage, and goldson and whitner are two of the best hitting safeties in the league. Niners don't run the pistol all the time, and when they do it was with kendall hunter, now LaMichael James. The read-option is not a very big part of the offense, just another added dimension. 49ers play power football. They pull guards and tackles all the time and run down hill between the tackles. So if GB can't stop power then how are they gonna stop Gore? Yes, they were able to stop Webb's option and contain peterson, but webb can't throw well enough to keep 8 out of the box.... if GB puts 8 in the box, crabtree, moss, davis, walker, someone will make a play. Since Kaepernick has become starter niners points 32, 31, 13, 27, 41, 13, 27... Only 2 teams were STL and SEA both division opponents. Throw those 2 games out and niners avg 31.6 pts/game with Kaepernick, so I think 24 pts is easily possible... I think its the best game of the week just like niners saints last year. |
bpbeelen | 101 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by StoneColdNinja:
GB's o-line has been shakey lately. Rodgers could be running around a lot, but with his receivers all healthy now he should be able to score 3+ tds. I'm liking the over. Cobb didn't look like himself against Minny, and Jordy Nelson got shaken up again... I wouldn't consider them completely healthy |
LeagueCapper | 216 |
|
|
NFC West Division holds the 2 most complete teamse in football... Crazy how bad they were 2 years ago lol... 49ers love playing pass happy teams (GB, Det, NO, NE)... The 49ers want to make you one dimensional by taking away the run, and they will succeed at doing that this weekend... Only teams that give niners problems are teams with balance ( NYG, Sea, STL)... Rodgers will be there leading rusher with 30 yards, and niners will be up by 2 scores whole game with rodgers trying to play catch up... Vegas rolls with niners double-digit win killing all packer teasers and MLs Niners 34-20 |
LeagueCapper | 216 |
|
|
First of all, throw the Seattle game out the window because that was a bad letdown spot for niners... Back to back primetime games after flying cross country beating Captain America at home in December and having the emotional roller coaster that game was then playing in the toughest environment in the NFL against a division rival trying to clinch a playoff spot! I don't think anyone wins both those games, granted they got spanked but the blocked field goal was a back breaker. Those of you that say running game isn't important are tools! Yeah maybe on the season teams that don't have running games can win, but anyone making a run in the playoffs have to have some kind of running game. You have to keep a defense as good as San Francisco honest with some kind of run game, or Rodgers will be put under pressure all game and be forced into making bad throws. SF has 2 very good pass rushers on the outside in Aldon Smith and Ahmad Brooks (who is very underrated IMO)... SF is by far the best tackling team in the league and the packers like to get a lot of yards after the catch which won't happen against this d... Harbaugh and his staff knew who they were playing this week, they're not stupid! Everyone knew Green Bay Frisco 2nd round was a lock and they are THE BEST STAFF IN NFL! They will have a great gameplan to make life easy on Kaep in the get go to shake off the playoff nerves... I believe they will put him in a great position to succeed and will give the packers a look they haven't seen all year! Joe Webb is no Kaepernick, and he will give them fits with the read option (LaMichael James anyone) and playaction (Frank Gore anyone)... Michael Crabtree is a legit # 1 reciever playing the best football of his career and Randy Moss will make a play against the Packers ( he may moon their sidelines afterwards too lol) This game reminds me so much of last year's game 49ers vs Saints... Brees > Smith was all I heard going into that game, but there is much more to football then just a qb. Niners D is best in the league, and the run game favors 49ers big time... |
bpbeelen | 101 |
|
|
Louisville pick em (+160) Really??? Up 14? I'll gladly jump on that |
GMoney247 | 1 |
|
|
LOL didnt post the team... LOBOS -10 |
GMoney247 | 2 |
|
|
-10 (-115) Played sloppy 1st half with SDSU shooting lights out from 3... Lobos defense only giving up 62 pts/game SDSU on pace for 76... I expect alford to get on his boys, and they come out with a lot more defensive effort to win by 8-12 pts. Hope you guys follow this play |
GMoney247 | 2 |
|
|
-10 (-115) Played sloppy 1st half with SDSU shooting lights out from 3... Lobos defense only giving up 62 pts/game SDSU on pace for 76... I expect alford to get on his boys, and they come out with a lot more defensive effort to win by 8-12 pts. Hope you guys follow this play |
GMoney247 | 1 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by gamblerdevil911:
what wrong trucky what letting so down bro you make me worries you alway seeking for the true b4 clicking the trigger now you have no fate in you what happen tell us dude learn how to type proper english |
LVTruck | 42 |
|
|
WOW!! just barely covered!!
|
GMoney247 | 8 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by siberian81:
... is getting pounded by state.... what a bunch of wussies Lobos have been winning game since end of 1st half |
siberian81 | 5 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.