Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
@unplucked_gem
Yeah lots of words can be quite difficult to deal with, that is awful for sure.
So I will make it easy for you- Did Trump exit the military occupation during his term? Could he have?
How is that for less words? She was not the commander in chief btw just so you know............................
What a shitty thing to say by a moderator who is supposed to be setting a good example. But his partisanship is always shining through and he allows more fuckery to go on. Before you complain Ben, people that have been boxed can't reply to threads, we can only start one, so GFY (as you like to tell people) if you don't like seeing another thread.
|
Jarrett75 | 7 |
|
|
You love telling people to go fuck themselves. Internet warrior you are. How about you fuck off mate and don't respond to my shit. I know you are obsessed with me, but I'm straight. Stop stalking me sweetie.
|
Jarrett75 | 19 |
|
|
I think he's been boxed long enough. I'll even extend my stay for him to be released. All he did was talk shit to Cd329 or whoever, who thinks as long as the person isn't a member of Covers, it's ok to wish them dead. What a POS. Plus that "non-partisan" mod boxes me if I breathe wrong, so let Stu out.
|
Jarrett75 | 18 |
|
|
So you think it's fair I've been boxed for posting stupid videos and now for calling Zeusforpar, Kelly, you think that makes any sense or is justfiable?
|
Jarrett75 | 5 |
|
|
in response to your 80's wrestling challenge, I have an even better simple idea. How about you get your other communists, I mean Democrats and simply if Harris wins, I will never post in the politics forum again and if Trump wins, you and your cronies have to leave the politics forum and not post. I know they will never go for it, because Xi Jinping needs them on here to sew discontent and misinformation. But it's as simple as whoever wins the presidency, the losing party leaves the politics forum. I know WScrapper won't go for leaving the site, because it will drive traffic down. Either accept or you and the rest of them are cowards, because you know Harris is going to lose. And in spirit of this 80's wrestling challenge I leave you with a Ric Flair WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
|
Jarrett75 | 4 |
|
|
maybe not. But I'm sick of their bullying. Midnight calls people POS and they talk shit to anyone who doesn't see thing their way and this WSC person boxes me for questioning posting "a letter" someone wrote. I get boxed for calling Zeus, Kelly saying that's an insult. I guess I can see how it would be viewed as an insult, I wouldn't want to be called Kelly either. But they have been fucking with anyone who doesn't share their ideology. And Midnight is just as bad as the rest. So not cool, maybe not. But I don't give a shit anymore about peoples feelings. Fuck em.
|
Jarrett75 | 30 |
|
|
You come off real shitty knowing you can say whatever you want and WallStreet has your back, You both are POS as you like to say so often. I take solace in knowing you will sooner than I will depart this earth. And I look forward to that day. Night Night to you too, hopefully for a dirtnap you POS CRYBABY
|
Jarrett75 | 7 |
|
|
why don't you two go practice playing leap frog like you both are known to do.
|
Jarrett75 | 6 |
|
|
Logan Roy has some words for you. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_lIZ2Lg_iY
|
Jarrett75 | 2 |
|
|
So because I think Kelly and zeus are the same person, kelly is currently boxed is insulting someone? Where does it say that's against the rules? And why does Midnight get a pass for directly calling me a fucking crybaby? You are totally partisan and biased and twisting these rules as you see fit. I stand by it's a bad precedent to post someone elses words and say they were from them. But I guess that's A OK in your book along with calling me names directly, but me calling Zeus, Kelly is a step too far. Oh fuckoff with that logic.
|
Jarrett75 | 8 |
|
|
I simply said this post was a slippery slope...https://www.covers.com/forum/politics-87/nature-1970-political-comments-103867505 Then I asked for the explanation of why I was boxed the previous two times and he deflects and won't answer specifically. Then that old ass Midnight calls me a fucking crybaby and I get boxed lol. What a fucking joke.
|
Jarrett75 | 3 |
|
|
I can't simply state we shouldn't be posting others thoughts attributing them to them. Then that POS Midnight calls me a crybaby and you box me. You still haven't told me what rule I broke, you deflect so you can continue to box me without reason.
|
Jarrett75 | 5 |
|
|
Box me and not a person who directly insulted me directly, you are a joke.
|
Jarrett75 | 3 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par:
STOP WITH THE FRICKIN WHINING AND INSULTING OUR MOD ALREADY!!!!!! YOU ARE HIJACKING AND RUINING THIS THREAD!!!!!!!!! just simply asking for an explanation Kelly. He's obviously seen my posts asking for an explanation, he just refuses to provide an answer. |
Midnight1 | 31 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:
Quote Originally Posted by Jarrett75: So we can post ramblings from someone now? Lots of debunked information in there. If this is allowed it sets a precedent, but you know lots of things go on here that shouldn't be allowed, while others get boxed for nothing. So I am sure it won't go anywhere. WTF is your problem??? The man wanted to express his views & I helped him do so. Get a fucking life crybaby!
And now we wait. Let's see how this gets handled. |
Midnight1 | 31 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
@Jarrett75 Not going to fall for your bait and whine tactics, you posted the guidelines yourself the other day so you know full well what the expectation is. If you like being boxed then keep being antagonizing to other members, keep complaining about the political injustices which you have created in your mind. If you like being out of the box then avoid combative retorts, complaining, antagonizing, and especially member to member combative responses. Its ok for you to run your crazy in the box but it is not ok out of the box, I would have fully expected that at this point the concept would have stuck in there but maybe that isnt how you want this to go and if that is the case dont be surprised that you get boxed (or banned) for cause quite soon. The only way I can avoid being boxed is for you to do your job and explain what specific rule I broke. I think you are deflecting and intentionally being vague so as to do as you please |
Midnight1 | 31 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
@Jarrett75 Not going to fall for your bait and whine tactics, you posted the guidelines yourself the other day so you know full well what the expectation is. If you like being boxed then keep being antagonizing to other members, keep complaining about the political injustices which you have created in your mind. If you like being out of the box then avoid combative retorts, complaining, antagonizing, and especially member to member combative responses. Its ok for you to run your crazy in the box but it is not ok out of the box, I would have fully expected that at this point the concept would have stuck in there but maybe that isnt how you want this to go and if that is the case dont be surprised that you get boxed (or banned) for cause quite soon. I'm asking for specifics, not for you to deflect. |
Midnight1 | 31 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
@Jarrett75 You just got out and posts like #5 show you really dont get what is allowed and what isnt. Messages like in #5 have no place anywhere outside the box. I think you undersand these things but just cant stop yourself from blurting out whatever comes to your mind. while you are here, since you ignored my posts in the box, but responded to KC, what specific rule did you box me for the previous two times? The videos? You allow people to direct insults towards Maga's with backhanded comments. You know clearly who they are talking about. |
Midnight1 | 31 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
@Jarrett75 You just got out and posts like #5 show you really dont get what is allowed and what isnt. Messages like in #5 have no place anywhere outside the box. I think you undersand these things but just cant stop yourself from blurting out whatever comes to your mind.
what specific rule does that post break? It doesn't seem like we should be posting stuff and attributing it to another poster for 1. And 2 it points out that plenty goes on here that shouldn't. If it hurts your feelings, then I am sorry. But you have allowed this forum to become what it is. So what rules is that breaking specifically? |
Midnight1 | 31 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par:
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson: Quote Originally Posted by Beasttrain: @Midnight1 Project 25 is has been debunked Trump has failed to distance himself from controversial project 2025 because many of the writers worked for his administration. For example, Vance. @thirdperson TRUE. Trump lies all the time, including when he made everyone laugh when he claims he knows nothing of the fascist Project 2025. He even falsely claims he has the endorsement of Taylor Swift. Last week we heard the whopper about being in a scary helicopter ride with WILLIE BROWN, quickly debunked as false. Then the huge lie stating Kamala used AI to create fake images of her crowd size, also easily debunked as a lie. Then there is the big lie. This fake? Also they are posting ads for actors online to be paid to show up at the rally's. Her rally in NC last Friday had like 45 people
|
Midnight1 | 31 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.