jowchoo

12. DEN under 55

13. SF under 57.5

10. KC +4

11. PITT under 49.5

8. MINN over 42

9. NO under 46.5

Anchor :

LAC under 49

Satellites:

1. TENN under 46

2. NYG over 33

3. NE +11.5

4. TENN +8

5. NYG +14

6. CLEV +12

7.SF +10

Week 16: SMASH

All 5 anchors won 5-0

Satellites (18-6) with 1 pending

So, 5x (18-6)=90-30

YTD: 435-281 (61%)

the YTD will go up 5 or down 5 with my MNF of GB -7 pending.

Due to your generosity in sharing insights into SDQL protocols, I was able to tweek

MY regression teaser model. Week 16 results were 90-30 without spending juice higher than -121.

YTD:   (435-281) 61%

Came into this season with projections of 58% on 450+ plays

SDQL allowed me to drastically expand than number of plays and looks like increase my ROI.

Absolutely over the moon and my friend SPIRO from back in the day would be proud of my research

MERRY XMAS

@JoseAlonso787

 No, it is for HOME games

@vanzack

@SwampThingg

season>=2020 and team and week>13 and H

By tweaking this query, we find teams in the NE play (17-39) 70% under the posted total.

Teams are: Bears, Packers, Jets, Pittsburg, Browns, Giants and Ravens.

When combined with a regression status and embedded into a Teaser model, you could well be ahead of the curve.

This idea will capture some week 17 action for me. Btw the Viking are 10-0 to the over in this query.

Synopsis: In past seasons week 16 and beyond we have seen heavy regression on what has transpired for the season-to-date.....will it happen this year?....we'll see.

I believe this to be the case throughout the season..REGRESSION, especially teams that go OVER the total.

season=2024 and tA(RFD)>oA(RFD) and A and D and total>36 and line>1

(26-13)

25. CLEV +14.5

season=2024 and week>1 and tA(drives)>oA(drives) and HD and line<7

(7-28)

23. SF +7.5

24. ARZ +3

@chicubs09

#6 should be WASH +9.5

22. LAC+4

19. should be LAR +3.5

19. MINN +3.5

20. JAX +7.5

21. TB +3

17. MINN +3.5

18. MINN over 37