Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by DogbiteWilliams: Please somebody check the ATS history of teams in PIT's situation - a home favorite off a road blowout loss of 20+ points vs. the road team off a home blowout win of 20+ points. https://goo.gl/RyTTkD
|
lajohn | 20 |
|
|
ManUtd07: thank you, it was 50% of my under bet, i was thinking betting props 20-25% of the larget bet next time.
Also my apologies to theclaw, since I provided no info on what kind of research (if any) I did. Didn't mean to sound like an behind, but I clearly overreacted there.
|
Kebabking | 7 |
|
|
Yes, I am inexperienced, thanks for pointing out what I already said in the first post. The 'alot of rookie mistakes' part made me chuckle, though. Not saying you're not right, but you literally judged it from one bet. But I guess it is to be expected that I'm friggin up on regular basis.
I did research regarding how these teams play lately - though I did not look into how defensive grind fests in general work out, that's true. But, among other things, there were 9 sacks in the last meeting. I was asking if it's common at all, that defensive grinds (more importantly, EXPECTED defensive grinds) end up with lack of sacks, or was there the 'both QBs got wasted in that game, lets look into that before rematch' factor. I'm sure it's common sense for you, but I'm not exactly seasoned in the sport, so any pointers would be great... ...or just be arrogant, that works too. I guess I can take 'learn the hard way' as a pointer enough. Thanks none the less and have a wonderful weekend.
|
Kebabking | 7 |
|
|
Best to stay away from it then. Thanks for your input.
|
Kebabking | 7 |
|
|
Hey guys, I'm new to the forums and so far I'm excited seeing so many nfl bettors / advisors - crazy amounts compared to Central (more like Eastern-ish) Europe. Anyway, I have a question for more experienced guys, than I am (which at this point, I believe, would be everyone on this forum).
I made a bet on UNDER in this Cards-Rams game and put a total sacks over 5.5 side-bet along with it. Now here's my question, since there were only three sacks and I analyze the hell out of my KO bets, how bad of a bet was it? Now when everything is said and done, it seems crystal clear Cards would go in with the gameplan of getting rid of the ball quickly and rather have little to no gain, than to lose yardage - because hey, they have a good defense to back them up in case they have to punt. So my questions are: 1) is it a bad idea to go with these side-bets on heavily defensive (from both teams) games? From your experience, are there lack of sacks in games that are expected to be a grind? 2) does it even make sense to combo UNDER with this? it's kinda similar bet after all - you trust the D (no pun intended) Thank you for your input.
|
Kebabking | 7 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.