mortex2

Never mind. I misunderstood the Prop. Basically, the prop means Thiem to win 3-0. Forget about it.

Hi all,

I am looking at Jokovic - Thiem line and there is a Prop - Match Result and both players to win a set:

If I understand correctly option No for Dominic Thiem means that he loses match and does not win a set. Which pays +1300. Please tell me if I understand the Prop correctly.

Here is my idea of playing this bet: If I play this line for $200, I am risking $200 to win $2600.

Thiem to win 1st set is +300. So, I can play the Prop and then just drop $100 to break even pretty much at the start of each set, playing the Thiem to win the set. 

I will be risking about $600 to break even to win if Djokovic wins match with a line 3:0.

Am I missing something?

Please let me know if I misunderstand the Prop.

Thank you. 

Well, Thiem has shown great form, but the intimidation factor coming from big 3 is absent when playing Zverev. I mean Zverev has nothing to be afraid of when playing Thiem, he already got far enough in this tourney. I think it is Thiem's semi-final to lose. I also think that Thiem will lose it. Zverev's biggest foe is his own belief in himself. He loses, when he loses self-belief, there is just some sort of lack of character. I actually believe he will win AO title this year. All he needs to do is just not give a flying f.ck and he will be good. Just like he did when he beat Jokovic in Nitto finals. 

I am betting Zverev will get past Thiem. If he does not, well then.. I was on the wrong side. Kudos to Thiem backers then. Let's see who gets it right.

Enjoy the game fellas.

Cheers to all.

From here on choke will only worsen. 

May I ask why?

Nothing to get excited about. I am pretty sure Medvedev will shave off a set from Rafa.

Hey packers,

Why is no one giving Medvedev a chance to claim at least one set. Is this going to be such a one-sided beating? I mean come on, at this point in time Medvedev got nothing to lose...

Your bet is still on!

wagers, i respect you as a forum dweller, and I have no beef with you. I was just expressing my opinion, it had nothing to do with betting. Let's just leave it at that. 

Now, that is what I call sound judgement.

Nothing brings more pleasure than watching agonizing face of Williams. I am enjoying every game she loses. It is as if she is entitled to win and something goes wrong.

Dude, you seem to get it all personal. I was just wondering, why do so many people cheer for her. If you strip away nationality (e.g. Americans supporting their home hero), I do not see why many people would cheer on a girl who is physically bigger than her opponents. It is the David vs Goliath match-up, so why not cheer for underdog who is humble and shows excellent tennis.

And above all "shows no drama". I can not take Serena seriously after Osaka match last year. I wonder why others do. It is that simple.

LOL at the call. Priceless!

You know. It so AMERICAN with that she inspired BLACK women. WTF. Black woman is the same as any woman, and you sound RACIST in that comment. Who cares what color a woman is. I was talking about a particular character - SERENA. I expressed my feelings, you seem to have a problem with the way i view her?

I suggest you reserve your judgement for your children. You may need that for their upbringing. I was strictly asking about athletic aspect and aesthetics of any given athlete. You seem to take personal. I understand you may have a failing bet on Serena, but she still got a fat booty! I am not betting based on the looks. My question was why do people cheer for athletes that are not even likable despite their record.

If you were to choose a shag partner would it be Serena or Bianca? Anyways, chill bro.

You expect BUBBLE BUTT - one hit wonder to win? Anyone strong enough to return her service games ownz her!

Nope, she sucks when it comes to adversity. Over and out. It is gonna be 6-2 or 6-3 second set as well. Cash out if you can.

Why do people even like Serena. Not bashing but, here are the things I see when i look at her:

1. Out of shape (bubble butt, etc)

2. Bigger than most women, hence the serve (e.g. women's version of Isner, although he got no bubble butt, stick boring as FU CK)

3. Not very attractive or likable (e.g. queen complex, as witnessed in Osaka match)

4. Overall not a charming character to look at.

Once again, I am not bashing, just my observations. These are the things I see when I look at her.

Dimitrov will take it, by making Medvedev run from side to side. Eventually he is gonna tire out.

You are saying it, like getting destroyed by Federer is something offensive. Federer thrives on grass, and Berrettini can not pound his serve on grass.