Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pittsburgh -10 here... Playoff experience, all their weapons healthy, at home... I smell a fish filet here. Steelers too much for the phins..
Pittsburgh - 27 Miami - 13 |
Covers | 30 |
|
|||
Nearly everything in me says "Take the points", but just cannot... CenturyLink, January, Seattle's defense? Taking the Seahawks -8 here.. Seattle - 31 Detroit - 10 |
Covers | 21 |
|
|||
In the meeting in Mexico City, Brock & Co. had it... let the Raiders, with Carr, off the hook at the end.. I don't see much from the Raiders on this one. Houston with the playoff experience for the win..
Houston - 23 Oak - 9 |
Covers | 35 |
|
|||
I'm on GB and leaning the over... GB 27 NYG 17 |
Covers | 38 |
|
|||
Quote Originally Posted by vegasoddsgod: Patriots -165 patriots tease +3 patriots -3
Didn't even have to blink to make this choice. Money so easy with all the broncos future bets and vegas dave touting his behind off all over the internet. There's more than enough sharp money to cover the public win. Don't be a fool. Don't bet with your heart. Just bet smart. Trust your eyes. Broncos defense #1 left out of all 4 teams. But their offense is easily the worst. Weather won't matter in this matchup-if anythING the colder and worse conditions the better for brady and company.
With that being said. I'm truly sorry if you are not sold. I have no allegiance to either side. It's a good thing I'm a lions fan and love my garbage teams. Because when it comes to making money atleast I can do that without feeling bad for either side. It's GREAT to be a Broncos fan ! Your analysis, much like your team, is crap! |
Covers | 88 |
|
|||
Quote Originally Posted by Supercharged: No Edelman, no Amendola, 2 key players on defence did not play the last game in Denver. I witnessed New England open up a 14 point lead heading into the 4th and then witnessed for the first and only time ever New England blow a 14 point 4th quarter lead because CJ Anderson ran all over them.
Belicheck is not letting this happen again!
Easy money here, NE -3. Bankrolling this one! RIP to your "Bank Roll" Go Broncos !!! |
Covers | 88 |
|
|||
Quote Originally Posted by Toolarmy1972:
...i cant even read these cheesy posts anymore, denver this and denver that. .. has anyone been paying attention this year?...Mannings arm is done and the Broncos almost lost at home to the Steelers last week....take away the fumble and Steelers would be palying this sunday. ...they didnt even have A.Brown and they still almost won in Denver. ..Manning lost me $ in the blow out loss in that superbowl , several home playoff games, he choked against the Ravens at home. ...never again am i burning $ on him. Pats at half..Pats fôr game..nickel on money line!!!
I'm collecting today.... i'm guessing you aren't. Down with the Chowda Heads! |
Covers | 88 |
|
|||
I must add my Broncos have Mr Brady's number at Mile High.. Turd Boy12 is 2-6 at Mile High in his career. 0-2 in the playoffs and his 2 wins came against the "formidable" starting QBs Danny Kannell and Tim Tebow. I'll be wishing all Chowda Heads at Mile High Sunday a welcoming Colorado "Hello". ;-) Broncos 23 Pats 20 |
Covers | 88 |
|
|||
What do you think about Oakland laying 13.5?
Thinking they're far too much for Northern Kentucky, win by 20'ish.. |
biggs33 | 25 |
|
|||
Quote Originally Posted by j-walk:
Well my main point (and the articles point) is that this line can be explained. Oddsmakers reasoning here makes sense. So if USC covers I hope people dont get on here and start talking about "the fix was in!" Haha.. you're right. But I can't promise I won't say it if the Trojans win.. |
NickyZ5er | 21 |
|
|||
Quote Originally Posted by j-walk:
There's an article about this, good read... https://www.sportsline.com/insiders/25348709/vegas-top-10-not-feeling-the-utes-at-the-books/
Oddsmakers aren't sold on the Utes. Just because all of us squares here see that #3 ranking and think they are legit, doesnt mean the spread is gonna reflect that.
What side do you think oddsmakers are more worried about, the sharp side or public side? Therefore which side do you think they'd shade the line to? Think about that whenever you see these "fishy" lines.
I understand all that, but the sharps have got to be all over the Utes on this one... USC stinks. Utah's already got 3-4 good wins on this years resume topped with a W in a trip to Eugene.. Beat Michigan at home early, beat Cal and AZ St.. i'm still at a loss here and probably just chalk it up to a no play as I'm scared. haha
|
NickyZ5er | 21 |
|
|||
Is the fix in on this one? Why's UU +3.5 in this matchup? The better squad all around.. Maybe not on paper, but we've seen what' paper championships win.
Any thoughts? |
NickyZ5er | 21 |
|
|||
Packers get another win at Lambeau tonight..
Don't like the spread, or the ML odds, so probably no play for me. KC isn't all they're hyped to be. Each and every year it seems "this is the year for the Chiefs"... and i'm still waiting. As a Broncos fan i don't mind it. Might take GB on a prop "Team to score first" but still undecided there. Save your money for next week. BOL if you do test the waters.. |
Covers | 51 |
|
|||
Quote Originally Posted by holly66140: I LMFAO at any moron that says Harbaugh will not succeed at UM. I am playing UM +200. Why? 1) His resume is not a misprint. He could have gone anywhere but chose to go home. 2) Unlike his first year at Stanford, he did not inherit an empty cupboard at UM and finally 3) No one and I mean NO ONE in the mainstream media, not even the homers in AA are picking UM in this game. If you like contrary plays, UM ml is good value IMO. Simma down a little, Miss Holly.... ML plays are only good if the team you bet has a chance to win. Yes, Harbaugh is a good coach, yes he's a grand motivator, yes he wears khaki's... but the cupboard and more importantly the culture at Michigan is bare.. Harbaugh will eventually bring all the goods back to UM, and you may see a bit of that spirit tonight... but it won't be enough in SLC.. Turnovers from either of their underwhelming Qb's will be the dagger.. could get ugly quickly... I'm rolling with: Utah - 34 Harverines - 13 |
Covers | 43 |
|
|||
Well... 3 outta 4 ain't bad.... UNLESS it's a 4-teamer. Then it's crappy. Cubbies hosed me last night.. (BoSox, Mets,Tigers, Cubs)
Back at it today though with another ML 4-team special. Risking .5 units to win 6units
GET YOU SOME !!! |
NickyZ5er | 1 |
|
|||
|
NickyZ5er | 2 |
|
|||
All over the Tigers today... haven't trusted Burnett the last 4 years or so.. haha.
|
JonEphotBall | 10 |
|
|||
Poking around and spotted a nice little 4-teamer for today..
Hit, but did not post on Sunday.. although it took 2 extra innings game to get'er done. 4-team ML Parlay... risking 0.5 units to win 4.25 Mets over Phillies Cubbies over Reds Red Sox over Nats Tigers over Bucs GETCHA SOME and BOL !!! |
NickyZ5er | 2 |
|
|||
replied to
Maybe now that West Virginia guard can smack talk Floyd Mayweather, Satan and the IRS..
in College Basketball Quote Originally Posted by JonnyTwoTime: lol. yeah Kentucky won that big because of what the freshman said. It has nothing to do with how good they are and nothing WV could do about it, like the other 36 teams. How dare a player have some confidence and talk a little crap. So wrong of him to do. I'm sure the entire game and every timeout they were reminded of those daring words from a WV freshman. Apparently you didn't listen to the UK press conference and what they were saying after the game... The "freshman's" comments lit a fire under their a$$... they said they wanted to beat them by 50. It's true, they do come out flat sometimes... Why make sure that doesn't happen and run your mouth? The WVU kid definitely got taught a lesson last night. |
joepa510 | 12 |
|
|||
I like the plays...
The UCLA line scares me a tad as it's close to the "Too good to be true" category... Also leaning firing in on Utah ML... I think they've got the fire power to take the Dukies out. BOL ! |
Dabullz23 | 7 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.