Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
The bluster pre-game about how overrated ND is? The fact OK is playing at home? What quality teams has OK beat lately?
|
KautoStar | 90 |
|
|
The Sooners lose big games over and over and over again. They beat up poor and mediocre teams, but when quality competition comes they fold. That's no heart.
|
KautoStar | 90 |
|
|
How any of you idiots can give ND 10.5 points is beyond me. Sooners don't have heart.
|
KautoStar | 90 |
|
|
(A) I agree completely with your analysis of this game.
(B) Big fan of your picks in general. (C) Where do you get your stats? E.g. Bradford's completion rate vs. different receivers? Looking forward to more of your Week 6 picks.
|
cam2smitty | 40 |
|
|
I think Seattle is good at home for a couple of touchdowns. Leaving the remainder up to Brady and company. And while the Seattle defense is legit, the Patriots offense is even more legit. Can Brady be stopped cold? No way. I'm loving the over more and more.
And yeah, I think I'm going to add the Giants +6 to my list.
|
poltergasm | 11 |
|
|
The initial lines I like a lot are...
Patriots/Seahawks Over 44 Miami -4 Any thoughts or other early line likes? |
poltergasm | 11 |
|
|
Sides 3-5-1
Pick 9/20: Carolina +1.5 vs. Giants
|
poltergasm | 10 |
|
|
Sides 2-5-1
9/17 Atlanta -3 vs. Den
|
poltergasm | 10 |
|
|
Sides 1-2
Adding: Washington -3.5
|
poltergasm | 10 |
|
|
Sides 1-2
Totals 0-1 9/16 Cowboys -2.5 vs. Seattle Cincy -7 vs. Cleveland Houston -7 vs. Jax NE -13.5 vs. Arizona
|
poltergasm | 10 |
|
|
I feel, after watching every Dallas game for the last 15 years, that this team is finally legit. Their theme for this season is "Finish." Finish the play, the drive, the tackle, the game. They did that last week versus the Giants. Even their inexperienced O-line came up big.
Does that equate to covering vs. Seattle? I think so. Seattle looked unimpressive against an unimpressive Arizona. Wilson had flashes of greatness preseason, but this is for real. And he's no RGIII. Seattle has some weapons but Dallas has more. But for me, the matchup that matters most is the Dallas defense. It's hungry and well coached. They've had extra days to prep for just this game. Their defensive line will (mostly) slow down the running game, forcing the jittery Wilson to make some plays. And he will. Maybe even a couple of big ones. But not enough, not enough to sustain drives. I see Seattle kicking 3-4 field goals, not scoring touchdowns. And let's face it: they're going to need TDs to win. Because Dallas' offense is explosive. And DeMarco Murray might have another field day. I bought the half-point and am taking Dallas -2.5 versus a mediocre Seattle squad who can't overcome a smothering Dallas D-line.
|
cowboys4949 | 46 |
|
|
Sides 0-2
Totals 0-1 9/13/2012 -Thursday GB -6 vs. Chicago 9/16/2012 - Sunday Dallas -2.5 vs. Seattle (bought 1/2 pt.) Cincy -7 vs. Cleveland |
poltergasm | 10 |
|
|
Sides: 0-0
Totals: 0-0 9/10/2012 - Monday Cincy +7 v. Baltimore Oak pk. v. San Diego Oak/SD over 47
|
poltergasm | 10 |
|
|
I'm using this thread to document my picks for the 2012 NFL season.
|
poltergasm | 10 |
|
|
Hello all, I told myself I would wait until Week 3 to bet. But, being a degenerate, I can't. So let's talk Monday Night Football.
I'm leaning heavy toward Cincy +7. They tend to play Baltimore close. I'm still not sold on Flacco. And Cincy is more loaded than they've been in a long time. That's my gut. I'm completely on the fence about Oakland/SD. Is there any edge in this game??
|
poltergasm | 2 |
|
|
IT WASN'T A FLAGRANT.
I'm sorry your poorly coached Wisconsin team lost. Don't take it out on me. :)
|
shawnp | 56 |
|
|
I don't think I'm a fucking moron, but some may disagree with me on that.
(Are you really that fat?) They didn't DESERVE the flagrant call. Moreover, my point was that too many people on these boards blame the refs for costing them a game when the truth is the TEAM they BET ON played poorly.
|
shawnp | 56 |
|
|
I'd take Baylor at -9, so no, I think -6 is fine. I got it at -5.5.
|
Jaysvdubwhat | 7 |
|
|
Please stop saying "Haters gone hate." It's a retarded sentence for a couple of reasons.
First of all, "gone"? Don't you mean "going to" or at least "gonna"? The word "gone" means "no longer present, having departed, left." Second, it's just redundant and self-evident. It's like saying "Breathers gonna breathe" or "Gamblers gonna gamble." In other words: No shit, Sherlock. That said, you're mega super fade material.
|
mikeru3 | 111 |
|
|
What about Xavier makes you think they'll cover?
|
poltergasm | 20 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.