Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
David I hope this email finds you well. I'm getting back to you regarding the conclusion of the Investigation. It was stated & confirmed by one of our Partners that you took advantage on your rounds by using a System which benefited you in a non-permitted way, making those winnings possible. The decision is not reversible and your account will remain closed as an attempt of Fraud. The total funds removed & not refundable. I kindly advise you to do not open any other account which STARPAY LTD & MTM CORP hold as you will be immediately blocked & the same procedure applied. We wish you the best in future. Best Regards Fraud & Ivestigation Department The Dublinbet Team www.dublinbet.com For your information, I have been playing mostly baccarat, but also roulette and blackjack. I won the money fair and square by playing by their rules. I don’t have a problem with a casino wanting to ban a player. That’s fine, I’ll play elsewhere if they don’t want my business. But stealing my money? That’s where I have a big problem. In summary, I want the $18,000+ USD that I won, as well as the $1979 USD payout which seems to have been canceled (even though they approved it a while ago). I am aware that posting on online
forums won't get my money back, but I thought I would let you know about
them. Avoid Dublinbet, period. I have filed a complaint with their license provider, Curacao e-Gaming, and got in touch with a lawyer from over there so that I can sue them (to get my money back + punitive damages). We'll see how it plays out. |
Professor-MJ | 4 |
|
|
When I woke up on March 22nd, I had received the following email: Dear David, I hope this email finds you well. I'm writing regarding your Account on Dublin Bet & it's temporary Closure. We were notified by one of our Providers about your GamePlay. For the same reason, your account has been redirected to the responsible Department for further investigation. Your account will remain closed until the investigation is concluded and settled. This process should not take longer than 72 hours & you will be informed along the way. We apologize for any inconvenience, but we would like to point out, this process will help us to ensure the greatest standards in our Casino. Thank you for your understanding regarding this matter. Best Regards, DublinBet Team - www.DublinBet.com Finally, on March 26th I got this message from them: |
Professor-MJ | 4 |
|
|
Hello all, On February 25th 2018, I funded my Dublinbet account with $5029 USD. Over the next few days, my balance went as low as $500; I bet it all on a single baccarat hand and won it. Then, I proceeded to make a nice comeback. My balance reached $13,102.90$ on March 15th. I requested a $1979 payout, which was approved promptly (although as of March 29th it still hasn’t reached my bank account). After deducting this amount, my balance now stood at $11,123.90. I won more money over the next week or so, such that my balance went to $18,973.13 USD on March 21st. I lost a few hundred bucks in the evening and did not log the exact amount, but the balance was definitely above $18,000 USD. |
Professor-MJ | 4 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Streakcash: Will se next year great job auuuu thanks mj $$$$ you have reason$$$$$ Thanks buddy, we'll talk again next year for sure!!
|
Professor-MJ | 13 |
|
|
Good luck all on your bets!!
|
Professor-MJ | 13 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by zebrakiller: Professor i wsh i could get you to risk a few bucks on the Eagles i have proven superbowl facts of past superbowl winners. and i'm not afriad to say the word LOCK Guarantee winner in possibly a DD win for eagles Bad Karma coming in ON Patriots The hand Injury to brady. The Concussion to Gronk other players limping in. with hammy that will pop up in game and Pats weak defense thee worst ever in superbowls will get steam rolled YOU give this eagles team a 10 point lead at half and again in 3rd quarter more points like maybe 28 - 10 or 28 - 17 forget about your 4th quater come backs Brady fina;l score i predict if all passing more than ground Eagles 38 Patriots 21 or 24 - or 28 I totally despise the words "lock" or "guaranteed winners". Doesn't mean anything, unless you are God and know the final score in advance. The Pats have the weakest defense ever in Super Bowls?? My gosh, I had read enough, that's not serious, come on.
|
Professor-MJ | 13 |
|
|
Hello my friends, yes, the Super Bowl is finally upon us! This two-week delay is killing me every year. The Patriots overcame a 14-3 deficit to beat the Jacksonville Jaguars to punch their ticket for an eight time in the Brady/Belichick era. Meanwhile, the Eagles destroyed the Vikings 38-7 despite being home underdogs for the second straight week. Speaking of underdogs, according to Sports Interaction’s weekly article dogs have been 8-1-1 against the spread during the current playoffs! I was also surprised when I heard that the Patriots are the biggest favorites over the past 9 years in a Super Bowl game. All right, it’s now time for my very last pick of the 2017 NFL season! PICK #1: Philadelphia Eagles +4.5 vs New England Patriots Let me be 100% clear to you: I am not going to bet this game because I don’t see enough value in this line. In other words, I’m not confident enough to put money at risk. But like I said at the beginning of the postseason, I am still going to make picks on every playoff game for entertainment purposes. My analysis tells me to bet Philadelphia, but I’m wary of fading New England considering they have been covering machines for a long time. I absolutely love Doug Pederson’s play-calling offensively. I believe the Eagles’ offense is playing better than they normally should, based on the talent level. I’m not saying they don’t have good players, not at all. They do have some good playmakers. But smart play calls and blocking schemes are helping Philadelphia to score more points than they would under many other coaching staffs. Historically, when Tom Brady loses a game it often happens because he got pressure in his face coming from the middle of the line. That’s exactly one of Philadelphia’s strengths, namely because of Fletcher Cox, who is literally a beast. I do believe the Eagles’ defense will be able to disrupt the high-octane New England offense and keep this game close. A straight up upset is also possible. The Brady/Belichick duo has been to seven Super Bowls in the past. They are 5-2 straight up, but 3-4 against the spread. All of these games were decided by exactly three or four points, except last year’s overtime win which ended by a six-point margin. In other words, all of them were close. I don’t see why this year should be any different, especially considering how solid Philadelphia’s defense is. But the NFL sometimes finds ways to surprise us, so we’ll see! Before New England’s comeback against the Falcons in last year’s Super Bowl, the underdog had covered 8 of the previous 9 Super Bowls. Is that just randomness, or are favorites feeling more nervous? In this case, the Patriots are used to playing the Big Game, so I’m not sure this stat is super relevant, albeit interesting to note. The latest news regarding tight end Rob Gronkowski indicate he will be out there against the Eagles. He has been practicing fully, and is expected to be cleared from a concussion pretty soon. This is it for this year’s NFL picks by Professor MJ, I really hope you were able to profit from them. It was a great season and I hope I can duplicate the results next year. Thank you very much for your attention, enjoy the game with your loved ones, bye guys! Professor MJ
|
Professor-MJ | 13 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by FallopianTuber:
QUOTE Originally Posted by spotslife1: NFL playoff teams coming off a SU home underdog playoff win (Eagles) are just 1-16 SU and 2-15 ATS in follow-up games. Posting these stats make me chuckle as if the poster is bringing something to the table. This kind of info is irrelevant. I see it as the team is due. I see different players in different situations. Each game is unique, stop wasting others time with this crap. It makes me chuckle every time you post because it seems like all you do is bash people and try to ridicule them (as if you're trying to show you are superior to others). Just say what you have to say; no need to laugh at people. I'm sure you can do it. |
Professor-MJ | 18 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by zebrakiller: what were these teams rankings and how many wins that year i recall one 7-9 div winner Seahwks beat saints as a 10.5 home dog then ousted @ bears on the road as a 10 point dog SO i disregard your trend LOL you recall just one game, and based on that you "disregard the trend". Wow, I'm just speechless.
|
Professor-MJ | 18 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by spotslife1: NFL playoff teams coming off a SU home underdog playoff win (Eagles) are just 1-16 SU and 2-15 ATS in follow-up games. What??? If true, that's very good to know. Thanks for the insight.
|
Professor-MJ | 18 |
|
|
PICK #2: Philadelphia Eagles +3.5 vs Minnesota Vikings Most bookies are posting a point spread of 3, but Bovada still has 3.5 at -115 (or 1.87 in decimal format). Both defenses are great. In terms of yards allowed per game, Minnesota finished first while Philadelphia finished fourth. The ranks were the same in terms of points allowed. It’s been two weeks in a row where I have recommended betting the under in a specific game, and both picks hit. This week, I’d probably go with the under 38.5 points in this one. I have mentioned previously how I don’t trust Nick Foles too much. He did pretty well last week against tough opposition, but facing Minnesota is up a notch. I believe it will be difficult for the Eagles to move the ball, just like it will be hard for the Vikings to score points too. If you only look at the stats, Case Keenum had some pretty good numbers against the Saints last week. But I didn’t like his overall play, as his decision making was questionable in many cases. The interception he threw was horrible; he floated a pass that was basically up for grabs for anybody. You should never do that when you are up 17 to 7. He threw at least two more passes that were very dangerous, and he completed just 3 of 11 passes when under pressure, a situation that is likely to occur quite often this Sunday against the Eagles. It’s interesting to note that neither team has ever won a Super Bowl, and that Minnesota has lost five straight NFC Championship games. To be honest with you, I don’t see much value in this line. At +3.5 points, I like the Eagles a bit, but the majority of online bookmakers have tagged the Vikings as 3-point favorites, in which case I would personally stay away. My prediction is a very close Vikings win, which is why I’m not overly excited about my Eagles +3.5 pick. Like I said earlier, I would feel more comfortable betting the under in this game. CONCLUSION All right, that’s it for today, as usual I want to say a big thanks to you, my readers, I really appreciate you. I hope you’ll get a chance to watch the games with friends or family and have a good time, that’s the most important. So this is Professor MJ from Quebec City, thanks for reading and good luck with your sports investments, ciao! Professor MJ |
Professor-MJ | 18 |
|
|
Hello guys, this is Professor MJ, I’m really excited about this weekend’s games which will determine who will make it to the Super Bowl. Last week our picks were 1-2-1, so our record in the playoffs is now 3-4-1. As I said before the postseason began, I did not necessarily expect great results since I usually don’t make picks on every single game, because I’d rather choose the ones that provide the most value. But it can still be fun to give it a try, though! Without further ado, here is my analysis of both Conference Championship games! PICK #1: New England Patriots -8.5 vs Jacksonville Jaguars The Patriots have beaten the spread on 9 of their past 10 games, so it’s hard to pick against them. As a matter of fact, according to Jason Logan from Covers.com, the Pats have covered the chalk 57.5% of the time over the past 10 years, which is amazing. If the rumours are true that there is some dissension among Robert Kraft, Bill Belichick and Tom Brady, we did not see any impact on the field last week against the Titans, as the Pats easily handled them at Gillette Stadium. One of my arguments in favor of New England is similar to last week when justifying my pick on the Pats against the Titans. Jacksonville pulled off a great upset in Pittsburgh last week, and that might have been their version of the Super Bowl. Deep down inside, they might feel like they’ve already accomplished something great. New England also has much more playoff experience; they have been through Conference Championship games before, whereas Blake Bortles and Leonard Fournette haven’t. Can you believe it will be the 7th consecutive year that the Pats make it to the AFC Championship game? I really love what the Jags defense has done this year and it would make things interesting if they could bottle up the high-powered Patriots offense, but it won’t be easy. They forced key turnovers in Pittsburgh last week, but keep in mind that they still ended up allowing 545 total yards. I was super impressed by the way Jacksonville handled the situation with the lead last week. You would expect them to try to run the ball and play conservatively to run out the clock, but they knew how dangerous the Steelers could be so they kept throwing some passes and it paid off big-time. I really tip my hat off to their coaching staff. Tom Brady injured his right hand during practice this week, but it’s considered a minor injury and it should not affect him this Sunday. Speaking of injuries, another reason why I am leaning towards New England is because star running back Leonard Fournette aggravated an ankle injury in Pittsburgh last week. He left the game, and he was much less effective when he came back. They need him in top form for the Jags to have any chance of winning this match. Even though it may not be super relevant from a betting perspective, I just want to point out that New England has won its last seven meetings with the Jaguars. Jacksonville’s last win over the Pats occurred back in 1999.
|
Professor-MJ | 18 |
|
|
replied to
NFL Picks for the Divisional round by Professor MJ (35-23-3 regular season)
in NFL Betting
Ok 1-1 Saturday (2-1 if you include the under on Atl-Phi), let's see what happens Sunday!
|
Professor-MJ | 24 |
|
|
replied to
NFL Picks for the Divisional round by Professor MJ (35-23-3 regular season)
in NFL Betting Quote Originally Posted by ProvoloneJoe: 3 out of 4 Which one do you disagree with? (just out of curiosity)
|
Professor-MJ | 24 |
|
|
replied to
NFL Picks for the Divisional round by Professor MJ (35-23-3 regular season)
in NFL Betting Quote Originally Posted by Mcmanus: I wonder if the whole Patriots are a dysfunctional team thing will moviate them for a big win here...The Hoodie and Brady love these situations historically ..We Shall see That's exactly what I'm thinking too. When you believe they might be down, they tend to rebound strongly.
|
Professor-MJ | 24 |
|
|
replied to
NFL Picks for the Divisional round by Professor MJ (35-23-3 regular season)
in NFL Betting Quote Originally Posted by Dogjimbo: Good results this year, MJ. Like the Steeler play. and riding N.E.. Saints/Vikes should be a close game and I'm leaning Philly at home. BOL Thanks for the input and good luck to you too!!
|
Professor-MJ | 24 |
|
|
replied to
NFL Picks for the Divisional round by Professor MJ (35-23-3 regular season)
in NFL Betting Quote Originally Posted by themyth: Thanks alot MJ, I really love your in depth analysis every time you post. Please keep posting! - Best of luck and Happy New Year my friend! ---- THE Myth Happy 2018 to you too The Myth, I hope it brings good health and profitable sports investments!!
|
Professor-MJ | 24 |
|
|
replied to
NFL Picks for the Divisional round by Professor MJ (35-23-3 regular season)
in NFL Betting Quote Originally Posted by bettingson: I just registered solely to say how much I enjoy your predictions. Every Thursday I'm on here waiting to read them. Always insightful always thoughtful, and I certainly appreciate it. Keep sharing with us! WOW, thanks a lot buddy!! I always appreciate such nice comments; it helps keep doing it. Thanks again!
|
Professor-MJ | 24 |
|
|
replied to
NFL Picks for the Divisional round by Professor MJ (35-23-3 regular season)
in NFL Betting PICK #3: Pittsburgh Steelers -7 vs Jacksonville Jaguars Back in week #5, the Jaguars came to Heinz Field and stunned the crowd with a 30-9 win, a game where Leonard Fournette ran for 181 yards and Ben Roethlisberger threw five interceptions and said after the game that he wondered “if he still has it.” Big Ben had a solid year after this match, and the team went on to win 11 of its final 12 games, the only loss being a heartbreaker against New England, a game they could have easily won. There is no doubt the Jaguars defense is great. They finished 2nd in points allowed, yards allowed and total sacks. Guess which team finished first in terms of sacks? That’s right, the Steelers. Pittsburgh’s defense did a nice job, too. But their offense is much more trustworthy, not only in terms of how well they performed, but also with respect to playoff experience. The Jaguars offense is just too one-dimensional, in my opinion. They rely on their running game too much, which makes game-planning much easier for opposing teams. Jacksonville scored 10 points last week against Buffalo and 10 points in their final regular season game at Tennessee. But seven of those points happened on a fumble return, so the offense has only generated 13 points over the past couple of games. Blake Bortles has been really horrible, there is no other way to put it. In case you are wondering, in the earlier meeting in Pittsburgh Bortles went 8-for-14 for 95 yards, no touchdowns and one interception. It was Fournette and the defense that did all the damage. All-Pro wide receiver Antonio Brown is set to return after missing two games. He practiced in full this week. Whether he is 100% or not remains to be seen, though. But at the very least he should draw a lot of attention and could make the running game better. One more thing to consider is the impact of Ryan Shazier. After suffering a scary spinal injury, he showed up at practice this week and he will probably be a source of inspiration for his teammates. PICK #4: Minnesota Vikings -5 vs New Orleans Saints It almost feels like this game will decide who moves on to the Super Bowl in the NFC because the #6 seed Falcons and the Eagles minus Carson Wentz appear like weaker teams. Minnesota will try to become the first team ever to play the Super Bowl at home. The Saints had the #2 offense, while the Vikings had the #1 defense. We have witnessed seven occurrences of a top 2 offense facing a top 2 defense since 1990; the strong defense shows a 6-1 record. This is the only game where I have observed a fairly clear reverse line move. The line opened at 3.5 and moved to 5 despite more than 60% of spread and money line bets going on New Orleans. In other words, sharp money is backing the Vikings. The Vikings beat the Saints 29-19 at home in their season opener. But both teams underwent significant changes since that game in terms of player personnel. At that time, Sam Bradford was the Vikings’ starting quarterback and Dalvin Cook was their starting running back; both went down to injuries are were replaced by Case Keenum and a mix of Jerick McKinnon and Latavius Murray. As for the Saints, they got rid of ex-Viking Adrian Peterson, a decision that turned out great as the duo of Alvin Kamara and Mark Ingram had a stellar season. Minnesota is pretty healthy, while New Orleans is battered which is a source of concern for them because depth could be an important factor when facing such a strong opponent. CONCLUSION Wow, can you believe I’m actually picking all favorites this week? As a sports investor that tends to pick more underdogs than favorites, even I am surprised by this phenomenon. I am very grateful that you guys are there every week to read my reports, and please remember to take a look at my sportsbook reviews and clicking my affiliate links the next time you decide to do business with a new bookmaker. So this is Professor MJ, thanks again for your attention, I’ll be there next week to make picks about the Conference Championship games, see ya! Professor MJ |
Professor-MJ | 24 |
|
|
replied to
NFL Picks for the Divisional round by Professor MJ (35-23-3 regular season)
in NFL Betting PICK #2: New England Patriots -13.5 vs Tennessee Titans One thing we have learned over the years about the Patriots is you don’t want to poke the bear. Don’t make them mad and even more motivated for a game. New England had to deal with a controversy about potential dissension among owner Robert Kraft, head coach Bill Belichick and quarterback Tom Brady. They’ll want to quiet the critics, and that’s not good news for Tennessee. I also feel like the Titans might run out of gas after playing back-to-back games where they basically needed a win to survive. Their comeback in Kansas City last week was great, but deep down inside they might feel like they’ve already accomplished something great. In injury news, running back DeMarco Murray has been ruled out of the game, which is not necessarily a huge blow to the Titans considering how great Derrick Henry has been playing, but having him to keep legs fresh would have been nice. In contrast, the Patriots are likely to welcome back James White and Rex Burkhead in the backfield. With Dion Lewis already playing great, they will be loaded at this position. Surprisingly, New England might need their running backs playing great because Tom Brady’s play has been dropping recently. The drop-off between his numbers over its first 12 games of the season versus the last 4 is jaw-dropping. During the first 12 games, he completed 68.5% of his passes compared to just below 60% the rest of the year. Brady threw 26 TD passes and 4 picks throughout the first 12 contests, while he got 6 TDs and 4 interceptions in his last four games. In other words, half of his interceptions this season occurred over the final four games. There is a 16-year age difference between Brady and Mariota. Still according to Dan Hanzus from NFL.com, in 7 previous playoff games since 1970 featuring opposing quarterbacks with an age difference of 13+ years, the older guy went 6-1. The Patriots have defeated the Titans on six straight occasions with Tennessee coming on top in Foxboro for the last time back in 1993. I am fully aware that players have changed over time, but I still thought I’d mention it even though that’s not a main justification for this pick. I just don’t trust the Titans too much. New England finished the year with a +162 point differential, which is a lot better than Tennessee’s -22 point differential. Mariota threw just 13 touchdown passes versus 15 interceptions. Sure, he is great running the ball, but the Patriots are known for smart game-planning. And the playoff experience factor plays largely in favor of New England. |
Professor-MJ | 24 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.