Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Obvious typo:
Not worrieDDD about Antropov and Kane being out for ATL? |
hitterno24 | 27 |
|
|
Not worries about Antropov and Kane being out for ATL?
|
hitterno24 | 27 |
|
|
Points taken. Thanks guys. Let's see what I can come up with.
Cheers |
SmboInc | 16 |
|
|
Everyone,
You guys are the best. Thanks so much for the responses. They are all really appreciated. Guess I'll just take a step back and hold on with the actual placing of bets until I can consistently pick some winners. johnnyfry: You're post helped out a ton. Thanks a million. phat03: I will continue to make sure that link is the first thing I look at every morning. Thanks again everyone, Sam |
SmboInc | 16 |
|
|
Guys,
I need some help here. Are there any of you that just kill it in other sports, and just can't seem to even come close to breaking even in another? My bread and butter is the NFL, and apparently the NHL just kills me. I put in the same time, effort, and unbiased research into both, but this damn sport doesn't want to reciprocate the love. Even when the picks are "solid" based on the numbers, it goes nowhere. For example, yesterday I had: CHI ML Dal/Nash (under 5.5) - for some reason my book had it at 5.5. Out of the the two, I had CHI being the more questionable one, but at +105, I couldn't not take it. The under was supposed to be the money maker. Of course, 1-1 until the 3rd, then 4-2 final score. The reason I bring this up is because I see a bunch of people on a regular basis here that have opposite picks of mine and do well. What I don't get is how do you come up with those picks when everything goes against them. Maybe I just don't get this sport. Can anyone give me some threads or people who post on here that are reputable? I would just like to tail them...I think I'm going to throw in the towel... |
SmboInc | 16 |
|
|
Sorry, this is what I was talking about:
QUOTE Originally Posted by Getty3: In their last 8 road games in an outdoor northern stadium after November, Saints games have averaged 56 ppg. Only 1 of the 8 played less than 45. |
Lar1212 | 90 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by kkkwinner: good point,merry christmas from dr. stupid stupid question - but where the hell can I get obscure stats like these at? |
Lar1212 | 90 |
|
|
@ TSW...
I personally don't think the motivation is an issue. However, the Rex Grossman point has been the only thing that has been eating me up. I didn't like it one bit since it happened, but I'm thinking this rookie QB (in addition to the fact that they can't score a damn TD) is making me overlook that fact. |
riceboy004 | 12 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by tsw: And why exactly will Dallas care about this game ? Because they are all playing for their jobs next year pretty much. And even if they have nothing to play for, they sure as hell have more to play for than AZ. I'm not even talking about the fact that AZ blows. Sure, Cowboys defense is off and they allow points to be earned, but remember AZ is one of the worst offenses in the NFL right now. If they can't generate points, the awful defense of the Cowboys doesn't matter much now does it. Cowboys all the way. |
riceboy004 | 12 |
|
|
lol that was funny. So what are your reasons for picking AZ?
I'm with Raven on this one until you can tell me something I don't know. :) |
TheFortuneTelle | 13 |
|
|
I'm with ya. You are right, I am over thinking this.
Thanks, Merry Xmas, and BOL to you! |
SmboInc | 15 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by kcobra: Can't overthink this. Ask yourself who is going to win this game straight up. The winner covers this game. No doubt Dallas. AZ offense is crap, but Dallas defense sucks a whole bunch as well. I'll go with my gut and pop one with Dal. Thanks kcobra. |
SmboInc | 15 |
|
|
... I hate the fact that Dallas is horrible ATS (1-5) on the road when they are favorites.
Arizona, when a home dog is 9-3 ATS. In my honest opinion, it seems too good to be true...how can an offense as potent as Dallas not blow out a horrible defense like Arizona's? Maybe I should just pass this up. Something seems fishy. |
SmboInc | 15 |
|
|
Guys,
This honestly looks like a trap game. I really want to unload on Dal @ -6.5, but I see why anyone would also want to unload on Arizona covering the spread. Thoughts? |
SmboInc | 15 |
|
|
Barber is playing. Williams is doubtful.
|
BaseballCoach | 5 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by PrimeTimeBoys: Whenever you post, I gotta get out my secret decoder to figure out wtf you are writing & im still baffled. ...ditto |
GoldenTaint | 62 |
|
|
Sorry guys, I've been going through this thread but I don't see what exactly makes this system different than Morrisson's. Is it just because the different conference filter isn't used for this system?
|
KongKiller | 855 |
|
|
nevermind... :)
|
gasman33 | 1160 |
|
|
No Cal[A] for today?
|
gasman33 | 1160 |
|
|
Guys,
Where do you guys go for backtesting data? I specifically need to find the lines for the first/second half for NBA. I have this new system I've developed and want backtest it. Thanks |
SmboInc | 1 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.