Spooker

If this is true,  why has the line gone up for Rams. I know the games were tight today and the bookies got lucky again on the "upsets". 

Ultimate way to suck wrong money.

1.Make a team like them underdogs for the first time this year knowing this will save them from a massive payout

2. Trust everyone to believe it.

3. Continue using the "Sharps vs Public" hoax/myth/lie to stop you from really killing destroying them. After all - it is picking 1 of 2 options. They just want you over analysing and using your memory of bad luck/misfortune/bad beats to continue FRAKKING you till your account is empty.

New England will likely win this game. 

Bill Belichick prepares each and every play - minute by minute, down by down. In fact he has an idea what score they should be at 7.08 in the 2nd. He is 20 steps ahead in the game and makes adjustments where necessary to get the peices back in place.

He is like the Illuminati - creating thoughts, conditioning behaviour, corrupting societies for their implosion. 

The Bookies won. They will win again if you have money on the Chiefs (hoping not but I'm staying emotionless)

Why? They made a slight adjustment and fooled people into believing Saints were favorites and SHOULD win.

After all - 99% of the World are fools and followers who cannot think beyond the level of a cabbage and may as well live the debt slaves and mindless consumers they deserve to be.

Yes - Saints "should" have won because:

1. They were home

2. They were home

3. They were home

But they didn't because:

1. They were not the Saints you saw over 6-7 weeks ago prior to Dallas. The Bookies just kept that delusion trough framing them as favorites knowing they were underperforming - MASSIVE MIND TRICK.

2. Brews was passing less and Saints were running more (which should give away the guy may have been banged up)

3. The Rams can score quick. The teams Saints have played normally do not.

2 years and 2 complete mess ups by 7NO . They know how to find a way to lose.  

Make up call has been "made up"

Trusting a kicker from 48 in this day and age.... What the Frak are the Rams thinking and doing???!

Trusting a kicker from 48 in this day and age.... What the Frak are the Rams thinking and doing???!

And now you are F A R K D.  Kicking is for losers.  Even if you didn't get it,  you had saints at the 1 with 5 minutes.  McVeigh will own this after the game to pretend he has a ball sack. 

Yep.  He completely farted his last brain cell there.  

Flees.  Burnt a time out.  Didn't go for it.  Better get the ball back now.  

Both dogs could win.  

They are only dogs because of where they are playing.  Bookies Ran a trap again and were looking for suckers on what are going to be 2 tight games.  

They get the mystique of pretending they can cap games and make you double think. 

Fk this auto correct. You know what I mean... 

Rams should win.  But I'm. Surprised no commentator has mentioned Hurley is likely injured which is why CK Anderson is getting the load. 

This could also be because the books are influencing decisions. They could come Up with any number and people will bet both sides and they will always win on the commission.

I have a theory that they know who will win.

Whether it is because they have inside info, historical data and lines they created which work, their "algorythm" program or simply just plain bullshit.

Their job is to f u c K you into the wrong bet.  Much like how they swayed money on that McGregor and Mayweather fight by fooling people into thinking McGregor had a chance.

So is they move lines down (eg. Chargers +4.5 down to +4), people may be forced to think Chargers are the side as "public or sharps" are betting on it.  This false sense of confidence created in a game (gambling) that requires confidence to win is what those parasitic business a S S h oles prey on.