Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
I'm a situational player in games with high spreads. I noticed that UCLA is coming off a very physically demanding effort in an attempt to best Stanford on the road. Now this young team had to travel to Autzen. I seen where a very respectable capper brought up this same scenario in another forum. For me I'll take the ducks -19. I haven't bet the ducks all year so this is not a bandwagon play. It's IMO the toughest back to back road challenge in the NCAA and UCLA isn't going to be able to keep up
|
The G.O.A.T | 2 |
|
|
Mega where do you get your team schedule rankings?
I like MARSHALL under this week myself. Don't see more then 8 TD's being scored in this one. MARSHALL will have long drives that eat up clock and middle TENN can move the ball well enough to move the chains and have clock eating drives that leads to punts |
MEGALOCKS | 69 |
|
|
Giants -3 and under 48 for me.
This game looks just like last night, 56% on MINNY and the line goes to 3.5. Meaning they want more backers on MINNY. That's the way I interpret it Anyhow. |
Macwestie1 | 45 |
|
|
i like cmu too.. they're QB being out bother you at all?
|
SportsFreak69 | 24 |
|
|
CFL is 6-0 ATS L6 after accumulating less than 275 total yards of offense in previous game
|
CarolinaPride | 61 |
|
|
CFL is 6-0 ATS L6 after accumulating less than 275 total yards of offense in previous game
|
WhiteMice | 19 |
|
|
Louisville's numbers are very misleading. They have yet to face a top 50 offense averaging over 400 yards and 28+ PTs a game
|
WhiteMice | 19 |
|
|
And did you know Memphis is ranked 11 in total defense, 13 vs the rush and 27 in points allowed. They are no slouch on D!
|
WhiteMice | 19 |
|
|
Love both plays GL
|
Prime Society | 23 |
|
|
Stache.. I also like the under in the ville as well as the under tomorrow night. NC plays slow as well with long methodical drives. Don't see it reaching 62.. Thoughts?
|
Mr-Stache | 22 |
|
|
^^ tex A&M proves week in and week out to have many holes on the defensive side of the ball. I will take the over in the rest of A&M games as a small investment. We all know they can and will score on any team in the nation.
|
Mr-Stache | 22 |
|
|
Puck right now 87% is on Miami and the line has moved in favor of UNC just slightly. UNC is a solid unit. I think they can move the ball well enough vs Miami to keep this game close on a Thursday night.. Your thoughts?
|
pucku27 | 41 |
|
|
Well that post was entered incorrectly lol
who cares lets get this money!!
|
rastad | 25 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by rastad:
I even parked my car on the street to make room in the driveway later.......... I FCKIN LOVE IT!!!! BEST POST ON COVERS EVER!! LETS GET IT!! INDY IT IS.. HAHAHA JK.. BOLTS PK TO THE BANK!!!!!!!!! For the brinks truck!!!!! |
rastad | 25 |
|
|
COLTS ARE BEING HAMMERED AT 72% AND UP AT EVERY SPORTSBOOK. THE LINE HAS LINGERED AROUND A PK TO 2 AND THAT WITH VARIOUS OPENING LINES. NO BOOK HAS MOVED THE LINE MORE THAN A .5 POINT ALL WEEKEND.
CHARGERS WIN 31-21
|
slick15 | 62 |
|
|
Damon I like the cards to cover this but it's going to be tight IMO. I'm looking at the over. How many points based on your break down of this game can Rutgers manage to put up? I see a 41-20 type of game. Any thoughts here?
|
Damon102 | 16 |
|
|
I actually might wait and see how high the public drives up the Oregon line. Anything 17 or higher I'll be on Wash
|
The G.O.A.T | 6 |
|
|
I've been over @ twitter tweeting all my twins.. Haha
I love week 7's card here are some plays I'm liking early.. Georgia-9 (b2b sec road games for MIZZ) Mich-3 Marshall-12.5(they have been money all year) Wisky-9.5(bad spot for NW period. The badgers are glad to be back at home laying in a very live crowd game at 2:30. This one could get ugly) AND OFCOURSE: BAYLOR Clemson Oregon |
The G.O.A.T | 6 |
|
|
I'm reporting both of you. Mentally insane. Hahaha
|
The G.O.A.T | 22 |
|
|
^^ I know that just rubbed me the wrong way the way he announced it. Like seriously bro? Stfu!!
|
The G.O.A.T | 22 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.