Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Eagles -3
(This pick and the previous one are not from the source/method noted in post #1.) |
VeritasAlways | 6 |
|
|
Need more? "HAPPY FRIDAY!!!!! Wake Forest 1h +4 , Wake Forest under 27.5, New Mexico 1h +.5, New Mexico 1h over 33" A typical fizzle day at 1-3, and not a single reply Good to see everyone but the newest of new posters here know what he really is. No one's paying him the attention he craves as fizzle so he switched back to it'salladream (actually it'sallanightmare for any who tail him) who showed up the day after Fizbo promised his guaranteed pick would win or he'd stop posting (it lost, of course.) He doesn't come here to help posters, he comes to amuse himself at the expense of posters who are new or naive and fall for his BS. He even posts smiley faces and beer mugs in a toast after his picks lose and posters call BS on him for his "Guarantees" and "Bet the House!" nonsense. He thinks it's funny when posters lose money tailing him. THAT'S who he really is. Do your research. Do not tail anyone blindly. Especially this guy. |
Cuno144 | 10 |
|
|
Where's itsalladream/fizzle?
Why, looking for a fade? Quote: He's still trying to bait in suckers with his air bets. And based on the lack of replies, failing. Just like his fake picks. It'salladream: "If this first quarter don't win I will give the first 4 people who reply $1,000.00 Straight Stake $8,500.00 Return : $15,827.59 New Orleans Pelicans -116; 1st Quarter Winner @T-Rex77, @none775, @SPark1, @nikon - You all will receive $1,000.00 I'm serious. Ok entry is close." And when the pick lost (of course) the attention-starved, click-baiting, air-betting-with-monopoly-money, record cheating, chronic wanker chode ran away and hid for 6 months, hoping the forum would forget. Last tracked record: 11-19, 36%; -$11,000 in just the last three days it gave picks, not counting the thousands lost in the previous 10 games it lost. And after a rare win he does his typical gratuitous reply to boost his post to the top of the page and brag about it, while conveniently not mentioning that his four other picks that night lost.
|
Cuno144 | 10 |
|
|
Oh yeah, his other favorite attention-seeking ploy that he pulls on a regular basis is pretending he's going to leave because "People are mean to me here!" He has no plans to leave, he's been saying it for years. He does it hoping to con the mods into protecting him, and to hear anyone beg him to stay. So needy.
|
LAGameofInches | 11 |
|
|
"Though I guess winning record in posting in all the leagues so there's something to be said for that." FFS, this guy - he just can't help himself.
"Winning in every sport?" Let's let reality dispense with this nonsense, same as always. He has a + balance in ONE sport, NFL, barely.
The math doesn't lie.
He has a losing record in college football.
He has a losing record in college basketball.
He has a losing record in soccer.
He has a losing record in the NBA. Full year 2024 he's 78-84: recently 35-21 (yes, 21 not 20) and 43-63 earlier this year, combined 78-84.
Football?
REAL records, factoring in REAL juice for when he played favs of -120 to -150 and lost:
NFL 55-45, BIG Bets 10-8, +$285 (just over 2 units; Covers has real handicappers who make more than that in a single day.)
College 35-37, 3-7 BIG Bets, -$835
Total record 90-82, BIG Bets 13-15, total "winnings" -$550.00"
Final note - followers don't tail from game one. They see a streak and jump on it. Some followers don't understand that EVERYBODY who bets gets lucky sometimes and has a winning streak. And they don't understand reversion toward the mean (especially with a guy who loses so badly year after year that he has to resort to perpetually cheating on his record.)
They saw his early season win streak and foolishly jumped on it. And they were "rewarded" as the natural order of things has been restored - he's 16-23, 41% recent football play.
My fav lie of the week - he got caught shaving multiple losses off his updated "record." One of the guys here called him out on it and he pulled the victim card, as usual. "I don't know what your problem is, you're just a troll. I've been posting here for years and no one has EVER had a problem with me!"
He actually said that. "No one, EVER."
The fact is there hasn't been a single season in ANY and EVERY sport that he HASN'T brought drama in with his serial cheating, whining about not getting as many views as he thinks he deserves, boasting about wins he had the previous night but "Unfortunately I couldn't get in here to share with the forum" and all his other BS attention seeking nonsense.
"No ONE, ever!" That's not just lying, that's delusional.
I don't like cheaters, I don't like liars, and I don't like people who come here pretending to only want to help when they're really only here for attention.
Posting fake records doesn't help anyone, in fact it hurts posters who tail.
And nobody cheats on their record as much as this guy.
A poster asked last week, "Why do so many posters regularly condemn this guy?"
If there was no validity to it, it wouldn't be "regular."
The answer is because he asks for it.
And it's well deserved.
|
LAGameofInches | 14 |
|
|
ANOTHER soap opera in an lag thread. Didn't see that one coming (<-sarc.) Let's look at some facts to help determine who's telling the truth and who's lying (as usual.)
One one hand we have Unranked Champ. He has a long history of exposing frauds who post fake records, performing a valuable service for cover's members who look to tail others. (And for his efforts he gets called troll and hater. Why? Because when posters and their aliases can't challenge the facts they resort to personal attacks to divert attention from the truth.)
On the other hand we have lag, who has a twelve years long, well documented history of cheating and lying here. Every year, every sport, every season. NO ONE, in this or any forum, has been called out for cheating more times, by more posters, than lag. And posters get hurt because of it.
Here's just one of a hundred examples:
At the end of the 2024 NBA regular season, he boasted,"ANOTHER winning season!" and gave his reg season record as 34-27.
Posters who don't know him saw that and thought, "This guy's a pro, and a winner, I'm going to tail him in the postseason and make some money."
What they didn't find out until later (because they didn't do due diligence and read his posts before tailing) was that his real reg season record was 25-30, plus 6-10 on BIG bets.
At that time he didn't fold BIG bets into his main record, he counted them separately; 25-30 + 2 units each for BIG BETS = 37-50, 42%.
Postseason he goes 6-9 reg bets, 0-2 BIG bets, combined 6-13, 31%.
Reg season + postseason 43-63, 40%.
Yes. 40 %. But remember, as he likes to remind you - you're all just amateurs. He's a pro - he does this for a living!
Some will say, "No one put a gun to their heads and made them bet his picks" but that doesn't excuse the purposeful deceit that led to cover's forum members getting slaughtered when they tailed him. It was only AFTER he got outed for cheating that he's now forced to admit it was a losing season, not the winning NBA season he originally claimed,
He'll deny this of course (or use one of his aliases to post fake alternative records/numbers) but no one has to take my word for it, it's all right here in the Covers archives.
That fake NBA record was not an isolated incident. It's repeated behavior.
And when posters call him out for cheating, lying, and using aliases (proven with his own words, his own posts, not conjecture) he pretends it was an "honest" mistake, or pretends he doesn't know what they're talking about, or his favorite - he plays the victim card. The guy cheats then begs the mods to intervene because someone had the nerve to point it out.
Zero integrity, less than zero self awareness.
DON'T blindly tail anyone!
|
LAGameofInches | 11 |
|
|
GB-Phx/W Ill over 143' |
VeritasAlways | 6 |
|
|
More?
"HAPPY FRIDAY!!!!! Wake Forest 1h +4 , Wake Forest under 27.5, New Mexico 1h +.5, New Mexico 1h over 33" A typical fizzle day at 1-3, and not a single reply - good to see everyone but the newest of new posters here know what he really is. No one's paying him the attention he craves as fizzle so he switched back to it'salladream (actually it'sallanightmare for any who tail him) and replying to himself ten times a night. He uses at least two to three different aliases including "It's all a dream" who showed up the day after Fizbo promised his guaranteed pick would win or he'd stop posting (it lost, of course.) He doesn't come here to help posters, he comes to amuse himself at the expense of posters who are new or naive and fall for his BS. He even posts smiley faces and beer mugs in a toast after his picks lose and posters call BS on him for his "Guarantees" and "Bet the House!" nonsense. He thinks it's funny when posters lose money tailing him. THAT'S who he really is. Do your research. Do not tail anyone blindly! Especially this guy. |
Itsalladream | 5 |
|
|
Still trying to bait in suckers with his air bets. And based on the lack of replies, failing. Just like his fake picks. It'salladream: "If this first quarter don't win I will give the first 4 people who reply $1,000.00 Straight Stake $8,500.00 Return : $15,827.59 New Orleans Pelicans -116; 1st Quarter Winner @T-Rex77, @none775, @SPark1, @nikon - You all will receive $1,000.00 I'm serious. Ok entry is close."
And when the pick lost (of course) the attention-starved, click-baiting, air-betting-with-monopoly-money, record cheating, chronic wanker chode ran away and hid for 6 months, hoping the forum would forget. Last tracked record: 11-19, 36%; -$11,000 in just the last three days it gave picks, not counting the thousands lost in the previous 10 games it lost. And after a rare win he does his typical gratuitous reply to boost his post to the top of the page and brag about it, while conveniently not mentioning that his four other picks that night lost. So needy. |
Itsalladream | 5 |
|
|
Who’s more dangerous the cheetah or the panther? Off topic I know, but . . . the panther. I've seen them both, up close and personal. Don't get me wrong, a cheetah will kill you, but it has a little fear of the unknown, a little trepidation when face to face with something as big as it is, something the size of a man. The black panther has no such concerns. You look at it, the look in its eyes, sizing you up. You KNOW that cat is thinking, "Yeah, come one step closer and you're dinner." It's similar to a barracuda. When you're in the water, other fish eye you with curiosity. They'll let you get within a few feet of them before they swim away. Not the barracuda. He just looks at you, almost smiling with those razor sharp teeth, daring you to come closer. (I thought a short break from politics would be nice; probably not.) |
joe pockets | 53 |
|
|
The Mugg: "The lib media purposely cut a clip from a Trump comment to make it sound like something it wasn't, hoping their lemmings would soak it up.....& it looks like many have." In California the ran an ad. They showed PRESIDENT Trump (you sheep on the left getting used to that yet?) at a rally, addressing a few donors in the front row, commenting on how wealthy they are. He then went on to other topics. Later in his speech he was was addressing the issue of the pain the country was feeling due to the high cost of living caused by the failed policies known as bidenomics, and he said, "I'm going to get you tax cuts." They cut out the middle of his speech and spliced the tax cuts promise at the tail end of his comment about the wealthy donors, making it appear that he said. "They're so wealthy, they got a lot of money. And I'm going to get you tax cuts." And the "Oh yeah! Well, your guy lies worse!" argument doesn't quite make the point the left thinks it does. (Not to mention he's not "my guy" - I didn't vote for him. You don't have to be a conservative to laugh at the left, they make it easy because they're just so mock-able.) |
THEMUGG | 170 |
|
|
Correction: He doesn't come here to help posters, he comes to amuse himself at the expense of posters who are new and don't know him or are naive and fall for his BS. He even posts smiley faces and beer mugs in a toast after his "Guarantees" and "Bet the House!" picks lose, just like the "Inside Info" guy after "his" "Guaranteed" pick on the Giants lost yesterday. Fake bets, fake money. Documented 40%'er, and even worse on his "Guaranteed Locks." But don't take my word for it - check his posting history. Even the worst bettor (like this guy) wins sometimes. BEFORE you follow ANYONE do your research. Check the archives here, DON'T blindly tail anbody, especially this guy. Caveat emptor |
hadenfizzle | 26 |
|
|
Public Service Announcement Warning for new posters who don't know him. His last college basketball picks here were in March. He came in here at the beginning of the postseason bragging about his fake 70% in last year's tournament. Five or six forum members posted his real record and called him out for lying. Then he bragged about how much his picks were going to win in this year's tournament. But... he didn't even make it to day one of March Madness. Why not? Because he was 1-11 in his last 12 picks leading up to Madness. Yup, 1-11, just .08% in his last dozen picks, picks that were all "Monster Plays" and "Guaranteed Winners", and "Can't Miss!" and "Bet your House" etc etc etc. And he disappeared before the tournament even started. Some Fizbo classics: He opened the NCAA season two years ago with 13 straight losing weeks but bragged all the way how his bookies were going to shut him off because he's winning so much. Proclaimed himself the greatest capper ever at Covers and to prove it he started a new thread for his Top Ten Best Bets Only, guaranteeing he would show everyone here how easy it was for him to hit 70%. The thread disappeared after he went 1-5 in his first six picks. Three or four times each year he says he's going to keep a record just to prove he's not the loser everyone warns other posters about. The record keeping usually lasts 2 to 3 days at most before he stops because the losses pile up. Gives out five picks, the first four lose, the fifth wins and he bumps his post to the top bragging "Winner!" w/out mentioning all the four losers already in. Uses at least two to three different aliases including "It's all a dream" who showed up the day after Fizbo promised his guaranteed pick would win or he'd stop posting (it lost of course.) Not conjecture, it's a fact, he's the same guy that promised the first four posters that replied in his thread that hed pay them $1,000 if his "Guaranteed Lick" pick lost. It lost, of course, and stopped using that ID for six months hoping people would forget. One Saturday he started out betting $100 units, lost as usual, upped his betting unit to $500, then $1000 per game. Down $12,000 with only one game left on the card he said it was his best bet of the day and was betting enough to win all his losses back and finish the day with a profit. The pick lost (of course.) It would have been a $25,000 loss on the day except for the fact that he's not a real bettor, he has a well-established, years-long reputation of being an air bettor playing with Monopoly money. He doesn't come here to help posters, he comes to amuse himself at the expense of posters who are new or naive and fall for his BS, he even posts smiley faces and beer mugs in a toast after his picks lose people call him after his "Guarantees" and "Bet the House!" nonsense. Just like the "Inside Info" guy after "his" "Guaranteed" pick on the Giants lost yesterday. Fake bets, fake money. Documented 40%'er, and even worse on his "Guaranteed Locks." Caveat emptor
|
hadenfizzle | 26 |
|
|
Memphis fits as the Fade today. |
VeritasAlways | 6 |
|
|
Updated numbers: NFL 1-8 WNBA 3-6 College football 5-11 9-25, 73% The NFL spot lost but both college football plays won so it was 1-2 last week, 66% Fade, which is right in line with the 73% noted above. And it continues to lose in the NBA also, now 1-4, a very solid Fade. I hope some of the posters I was trying to thank were notified of and saw this post, and took a chance that my numbers were accurate. Or anybody who's sports betting and was looking for a play on those games. If any of the posters followed and want more just post a reply and let me know, I'll post this week's if I'm able to. |
VeritasAlways | 6 |
|
|
"Good catch! He signed as "indy" while logged into this one. You got to love how he has asked for and boasted about "indy" repeatedly."
In covers-speak, this is known as "Pulling an LAGame" or just "LAGamin" as in "He got caught 'LAGamin!'" LAG: "To say I have some burner account and use accounts to praise myself is comical, you have ZERO idea who I am!" Also LAG, copied and pasted from his own post: Post #23, by LAGameofInches: "I am so humble to all who tail me." Post #24, also by LaGameofInches: "I hate to sound like a beggar but I've been on a torrid run tailing you, do you have anything you like today?" Post #25, by Hannibal: "I guess he forgot to sign into his second or third nickname to comment in his own thread. But according to him the other posters here are the clowns." Post #26, by YardMatt: "LOL! Are you tooting your own horn and asking yourself for your plays, or asking one of your other ghosts?"
|
aussievegas1777 | 7 |
|
|
WMI - venmo me the $20, ok? (JK) |
Ilovefootballs | 73 |
|
|
"Mommy, mommy - make the bad man stop! Make him go away!" How nauseating.
WMI is one of the most valuable assets this place has. It's simple logic - most site visitors view only, they don't post. They come here looking for info to help them win their bets. When they see fake records and guys boasting about how LARGE their fake bet is, how great they are and how they always win, the unsuspecting viewers tail, and inevitably lose their money. Posters who expose the tout-wannabes and attention seeking frauds around here perform a valuable service to the site AND for bettors who can't 'cap for themselves and look to tail others. Yes, it's easy to say if they don't do their own research they get what they deserve. And some here have said "Screw them if they're naive enough to fall for some guy's BS" but thankfully others aren't built that way, they believe that helping bettors is not only an admirable use of time but is the very purpose of the forum. When the frauds and the aliases they use to promote themselves say, "Where are YOUR picks" it's a straw man diversion. You can't find a rule here that says, "Post picks only" because it doesn't exist. The forum is for sharing helpful info. Picks are just part of it, like local weather reports from guys at the stadium, injury updates etc. AND exposing frauds. And when the ones who get exposed cry out, "Hater!" and "Troll" they're just trying to divert attention from their BS, lies, cheating, and child-like "Hey - look at ME, I'm great!" behavior. Forums need more WMI's, not less. |
Ilovefootballs | 73 |
|
|
As promised to the posters listed above (hope you see this): Update on this 'capping method: NFL 0-8 WNBA 3-6 College football 5-9 And now, NBA: 1-2 Combined: 9-25, 73% A solid fade across all sports (and yes, all documented and time stamped.) Just have to hope reversion toward the mean doesn't come into play too soon. Teams that qualify this week: Navy, S Jose St, and LA Rams. Fade 'em. Not sure I'll take ND. I try to avoid the Irish (NOT because of the Blazing Saddles quote, I just don't like betting on them.) Already got the Vikes in pocket at -3, +105, waiting to get Fresno because I think the number will drop by game time. Record-wise, %-wise, I should add ND too, preferably today or tomorrow as it might hit -13'/-14 by Saturday. |
VeritasAlways | 6 |
|
|
That was the worst onside kick attempt I've ever seen. |
PUSSYGALORE333 | 23 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.