wareagle18tr

I don't think you understand what the word "bias" means. But I'm not here to teach. I would be very interested in hearing how you explain your belief that the A&M game was not as close as the score indicated. Also, are you going to be putting a wager on this game? 

But are you really going to hang your hat on the "common opponent" argument? Bruh, you're a fanboy. 

You're a fanboy. Are you saying, then, that all of their games have been blowouts except for the A&M game which you contend still wasn't in jeopardy?

I thought this was bias yesterday when you had only posted a few times and before I knew for sure you were picking Clemson. The ACC has only three teams with eight-plus wins this year. The ACC only has nine teams with a winning record, and besides the three I just referenced, six are only one game above .500.

Both teams have played four teams with eight-plus wins with ND obviously having the stronger group of eight-plus win teams. Clemson's group consisted of Georgia Southern and A&M, a game where they escaped with a questionable win. I believe ND is a tad underrated while Clemson is overrated due to the fact they played in such a weak conference (where a number of their games were closer than the score would indicate) and are being given credit for their recent history. 

You said you thought ND would win only 2 or 3 times out of 10. You may be right. But they're not playing ten times. I think ND is the better team in a winner take-all match up. They definitely cover if they don't win.

I also believe ND will beat bama in the NC. Bama has only played one complete team all year: Georgia. A team that's supposed to be as good as bama is (some would say greatest of all time) shouldn't take their first lead of the game with only a minute left in the game. And I think they lose that game had Tua not gotten hurt and forcing bama to play Jalen Hurts. But that's what happens when you've only played two teams that could give you somewhat of a good game, MSU and LSU, only because they had such exceptional defenses. 

Give me a break.

You say no one can hang with bama? Mississippi STATE hung with bama. MISSISSIPPI STATE. And they have no offense. Bama finally plays a complete team and only wins because Saban was forced to put Jalen in. Alabama hasn't faced an offense remotely close to OU's this year so that will be fun to watch. I suspect bama will squeak by the Sooners. But I don't think they will be so lucky against ND. 

English, MFer! Do you speak it?!

I took the over at 84, took a live over bet at 85.5, took OU over 45 and WVU over 42. All max bets. Only one I'm concerned with is WVU over 42

True. But usually not when it's two teams like this. It  probably won't be as high scoring as the first but will still be a high scoring second half. You made a terrible bet and will only win if you get lucky with a major injury to one of the QBs.

I took the over. That was just a bad bet, my friend. I wasn't thrilled about it when I made it, but I knew there was a chance.

*it's*

And you think Tulane doesn't need a win? It always makes me laugh when someone posts their justification for a pick as "they need to win" or "they're motivated" or something along those lines. 

I've got no dog in the fight, and I haven't watched any Buffalo games this year. But is that a normal move for the Buffalo QB to seek out contact like he did on that 50-yard run and fumble in the first half?

Well, I've got two NCAAB games tonight so there you go. And I had two NCAAB games last night. So as I stated earlier, you're an idiot.

Why make it so difficult on yourself? Just take the over.

Too bad OSU doesn't have the defense that ISU has.

You. It's people like you. It's always people like you.

If someone sodomized you with a crucifix, I wouldn't feel sorry for you.

You're right. If you go out of bounds, you can't be the first to touch the ball.