Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Monfils had the momentum too!.. but after all the delays? it gives korda a chance to compose. |
Bjorn_Borg | 69 |
|
![]() |
I've seen them play before, it's competetive. I went with Musetti +1.5 sets. BOL. |
JoseAlonso787 | 5 |
|
![]() |
I'm with you on Fils! |
Bjorn_Borg | 69 |
|
![]() |
Gotta hit the open shots and we're in this thing. Also how was that hammer elbow not a flagrant foul!! |
weGoinSizzla | 9 |
|
![]() |
@smellybunty Agreed, clemson slept thru the first 75% of the game.
Check it out tho... 3 pt percent from Bryants top 3 scorers: Pinzon 6-6. 38.5% Timberlake 6-6. 36%. Evans 6-8. 37.3%
They're tall enough to get their shots off vs a real team. Highly athletic i think we will see slashing/driving and dishing. I've seen their ball movement they find the open man. I'm sure you're right that the team may have a low 3 pt % but what if 2 of these guys get hot from 3.
Anyway in the spirit of March why the hell not play an underdog moneyline? |
weGoinSizzla | 9 |
|
![]() |
I follow the american east in some capacity because I graduated from Albany. This bryant team is the best american east team i've ever seen. Especially their top player Timberlake is flying around making plays on both sides of the ball and very athletic. Also I like top top 3 scorers (timberlake included) all taller than 6-8 with very good 3 pt shooting success this season. 15 seeds have advanced to the sweet 16 on 3 occasions over the last 4 seasons. Mich St does not have a defensive anchor in the paint coupled with the possibility of bryant getting hot from 3? Bryant has been a much better 3 pt shooting team than Mcneese and you saw what happened when they got hot. |
weGoinSizzla | 9 |
|
![]() |
I'm with you. Never seen em play but they've had very good 3 pt shooting this season. Mcneese got hot from 3 pt land yesterday too. I'm taking a money line shot too in the spirit of March! |
PayDayMx | 2 |
|
![]() |
Hi, I'm looking to parlay St Johns to win the big east, Houston to win the big 12, and MI St to win the big ten tournaments. I'm on hard rock.. it will let me parlay all conference tournament winners EXCEPT the big east. Any idea why that would be? Do other books allow parlaying tournament winners?
Thanks! Nick |
weGoinSizzla | 3 |
|
![]() |
1-0 all time. I'm new. Morehead St +2.5
Morehead St finds themselves in a revenge rematch game with SIU Edwardsville after losing the first meeting. I typically gravitate towards the team who lost the first meeting, it's not easy beating the same team twice in one season! (just ask temple and texas tech how that went over the last 2 days). Morehead St is obviously a capable team with a winning record 9-7. What's SUPER interesting is they are on a 5 game losing streak! This is good for us because they're playing desperate which means high energy and bringing everything they got. Not gonna lie, I have not watched either team play so blindly trusting Morehead St athletics department who have managed to secure the conference or tournament in 2021, 2023, and 2024 - Morehead St kinda runs that division for a while now.
BOL. |
weGoinSizzla | 10 |
|
![]() |
I'm beyond unfamiliar with both teams. Haven't seen either team play this season. Just asking for the basketball gods help on this one..
|
clark17 | 22 |
|
![]() |
Sharps are on SMU i've already seen 1 pt in line movement. IDK if thats even good or bad at this point lol! BOL! |
weGoinSizzla | 5 |
|
![]() |
Spreads on UAB and SMU seem too good to be true. I think SMU seems a bit more "trappy". Any significant injuries I should be aware of? |
weGoinSizzla | 5 |
|
![]() |
Spreads on UAB and SMU seem too good to be true. I think SMU seems a bit more "trappy". Any significant injuries I should be aware of? |
weGoinSizzla | 1 |
|
![]() |
Got the UConn money line at -110 during half time! |
Moneymaker923 | 11 |
|
![]() |
Cashing out! |
weGoinSizzla | 4 |
|
![]() |
Marquette -10.5 First Half
Typically I exercise caution in rematch games. However, multiple teams have already beaten Seton Hall twice - they truly are a lesser team in a talented Big East. I think we have a significant talent separation here - Marquettes a tournament team. Marquette has lost 3 of their last 4 games so this is a get right game for them where they should come out with everything they got and high energy. Seton Hall coming off a monster upset overtime win vs Uconn so I'm fading them with the expectation they are physically and mentally spent after leaving it all on the court this weekend. In Marquette, we have a true favorite at home with one of the best home court advantages in the sport. With monster spreads like this, I prefer taking first half. In the event of a blowout a favorite could take their foot off the gas and allow a back door cover. |
weGoinSizzla | 4 |
|
![]() |
@Moneymaker923 i agree. i like uconn but i don't think the spread is fair. i might consider a live bet if uconn gets into trouble (and they prob will) and I can get a small spread 2.5 pts or better. i'm sure part of the spread # is because uconn does have a very good home court (whether on campus or at the XL center). |
Moneymaker923 | 11 |
|
![]() |
@irw i mean memphis never covers IN CONFERNCE games. i dont really count the pre season, do you? |
FredLeonard | 19 |
|
![]() |
I got Texas at 2.5 before noon. Didn't know the line moved to 4.5! I stayed away from illy I thought 6.5 wasnt fair. Hey I said ALMOST always nothing's a lock it's called gambling. |
weGoinSizzla | 10 |
|
![]() |
@kings_duce
1. Memphis never covers. 2. Wichita state lost the first meeting with Memphis and the hardest thing in sports is beating the same team twice. 3. ESPN acknowledges the possibility of an upset as their broadcasting department picked this game out of all the others to be aired on ESPN (crazy games = ratings = advertising $$). 4. Excellent home court advantage, they pack the building when ESPN is there. |
FredLeonard | 19 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.